SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Quality in Education / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

HOSTILE ATTRIBUTIONAL BIASES AMONG DRUG ABUSER AND NON-ABUSER YOUTHS CONSULTING TO PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE CENTER

Tuba KESKIN
Nurten SARGIN
Pages
43–51
Publication Date
2020-07-08
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Recommendations are given according to the results of the research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study revealed the statistical significance, in terms of “Behavioral Attributional Bias”, of the difference between mean scores of Behavioral Attributional Bias, depending on whether or not adolescents have used drugs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study revealed the statistical significance, in terms of “Hostile Attributional Bias”, of the difference between mean scores of Hostile Attributional Bias, depending on whether or not adolescents have used drugs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Recommendations are given according to the results of the research.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Adolescence · Drug abuse · Hostile Attributional Bias

Abstract

The study revealed the statistical significance, in terms of “Behavioral Attributional Bias”, of the difference between mean scores of Behavioral Attributional Bias, depending on whether or not adolescents have used drugs. The study revealed the statistical significance, in terms of “Hostile Attributional Bias”, of the difference between mean scores of Hostile Attributional Bias, depending on whether or not adolescents have used drugs. Recommendations are given according to the results of the research.

🔖

Cite This Article

KESKIN, T., SARGIN, N. (2020). HOSTILE ATTRIBUTIONAL BIASES AMONG DRUG ABUSER AND NON-ABUSER YOUTHS CONSULTING TO PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE CENTER. International Journal of Quality in Education, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 43–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/768430

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Aktas, V., Sahin, D. and Aydin, O. (2005). Hostile Intolerance for Aggressive and Non-Aggressive Children Analysis of Loading Bias in Terms of Gender, Turkish Journal of Psychology, Volume: 20, Number: 55, ss.43-57.
  2. Aydın A. and Akgün S. (2014).
  3. Reactive-Proactive Aggression, Anger and Narcissism Relationship in Adolescence, Turkish Journal of Psychology, Volume: 29, Issue73, pp.44-56.
  4. Beyazyürek M. and Şatır T.T. (2000)
  5. Substance Use Disorders, Istanbul: Balıklı Rum Hospital Foundation, Psychiatry World ss.50-56.
  6. Dodge K. A., Malone P. S., Lansford J. E. et al. (2015). Hostile attributional and social behavior in global context, Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 112, no. 30, pp.9310-9315.
  7. Gençtanırım, D. - Ergene T. (2014). Development of Risky Behavior Scale: Validity and Journal of Academic Social Studies, No: 25-1, p. 125-138.
  8. Güven H. (2011). Adopting Adolescent Intent among Adolescents who are Criminal-ized with Crime Analysis of bias and some bias characteristics, Çukurova University Social Sciences Institute, Adana: Unpublished Master's Thesis. Please Note (1): The results of this study reflect the personal views of the participants, not the views of the Turkish Armed Forces. Please Note (2): This study is derived from a part of the thesis titled Enemy Procure-ment Bias in Adolescents Who Have Used and Substance Adopted to the Guidance and Counseling Center.