SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology / 2018 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

A Brief Review of Molecular Markers to Analyse Medically Important Plants

Sevgi MARAKLİ
Pages
29–36
Publication Date
2018-07-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This brief review represents usage of these markers for molecular diversity analyses of medically important plants.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Suitable identification and characterisation of plants using in medicine are necessary for conservation plant resources, investigations of genes associated with desirable traits, and understanding of evolutionary relationships.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, various molecular marker techniques such as RAPD, AFLP, SSR and ISSR, SNP, SCoT, ITS and SCAR have been improved to provide detail information about genomes, which were not previously possible with only phenotypic methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This brief review represents usage of these markers for molecular diversity analyses of medically important plants.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:AFLP · ITS · SSR

Abstract

Suitable identification and characterisation of plants using in medicine are necessary for conservation plant resources, investigations of genes associated with desirable traits, and understanding of evolutionary relationships. Therefore, various molecular marker techniques such as RAPD, AFLP, SSR and ISSR, SNP, SCoT, ITS and SCAR have been improved to provide detail information about genomes, which were not previously possible with only phenotypic methods. This brief review represents usage of these markers for molecular diversity analyses of medically important plants.

🔖

Cite This Article

MARAKLİ, S. (2018). A Brief Review of Molecular Markers to Analyse Medically Important Plants. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 29–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/767711

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Global Industry Analyst, Inc., Herbal supplements and remedies market trends http://www.strategyr.com/MarketResearch/Herbal_Supplements_ and_Remedies_Market_Trends.asp, 2015
  2. Baruah, J., et al., Genetic diversity study amongst Cymbopogon species from NE-India using RAPD and ISSR markers. Industrial Crops and Products, 2017. 95: p. 235-243
  3. Hebert, P.D., A. Cywinska, S.L. Ball, JR, and deWaard., J.R., Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 2003. 270: p. 313-321
  4. Joshi, S.P., P.K., Ranjanekar, and V.S. Gupta, Molecular markers in plant genome analysis. Current Science, 1999. 77: p. 230-240
  5. Hebert, P.D.N., and T.R., Gregory, The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Systematic Biology, 2005. 54: p. 852-859
  6. Hajibabaei, M., G.A., Singer, P.D., Hebert, and D.A., Hickey, DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. Trends in Genetics, 2007. 23: p. 167-172
  7. Valentini, A., F. Pompanon, and P. Taberlet, DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2009. 24: p. 110-117
  8. Eurlings, M., F., Lens, C., Pakusza, T., Peelen, J.J. Wieringa, and B., Gravendeel, Forensic identification of Indian snakeroot (Rauvolfia serpentina Benth. ex Kurz) using DNA barcoding. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2013. 58: p. 822-830
  9. Janjua, S., W.K. Fakhar-I-Abbas, I.U. Malik, and J. Mehr, DNA mini-barcoding for wildlife trade control: A case study on identification of highly processed animal materials. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 2016. 28: p. 544-456
  10. Di Pinto, A., et al., Packaged frozen fishery products: Species identification, mislabeling occurrence and legislative implications. Food Chemistry, 2016. 194: p. 279-283
  11. Williams, J.G.K. et al., DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research, 1990. 18: p. 6531-6535
  12. Lal, N., and S.K., Awasthi, A comparative assessment of molecular marker assays (AFLP and RAPD) for Cymbopogon germplasm characterization. World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2015. 4: p. 1019-1041
  13. Bishoyi, A.K., A., Sharma, A., Kavane, and K.A., Geetha, Varietal discrimination andgenetic variability analysis of cymbopogon using RAPD and ISSR markers analysis. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2016. 179: p. 659-670
  14. Saikia, D., et al., RAPD and ISSR based intra-specific molecular genetic diversity analysis of Cymbopogon flexuosus L