Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Determination of plant-specific retrotransposons in chicken

Pages
67–73
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Obtaining results could offer a practical approach for chicken genome analyses, especially for the identification of genes to obtain desired traits.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mobile genetic elements are also known as transposons, comprising a significant proportion of plant and animal genomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the analyses, there was no polymorphism among the samples in Sukkula analysis, while Nikita showed 0%–60% polymorphism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Obtaining results could offer a practical approach for chicken genome analyses, especially for the identification of genes to obtain desired traits.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Mobile genetic elements are also known as transposons, comprising a significant proportion of plant and animal genomes. Retrotransposons, a class of transposons, move copy and paste mechanism and, therefore, cause genome obesity. Moreover, the transferability of retrotransposons within and between different kingdoms has provided valuable information for evolutionary relationships in addition to detailed knowledge about genomes. We identified barley-specific retrotransposons (Nikita and Sukkula) and determined polymorphism ratios of these retrotransposons in a chicken genome for the first time to gain new insights for retrotransposons found in different genomes. Transposon sequences belonging to chicken and barley genomes were also investigated to understand the evolutionary relationships. For this purpose, the samples from Turkish native chicken Gerze were analyzed using a retrotransposon-based molecular marker, IRAP (inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphism). As a result of the analyses, there was no polymorphism among the samples in Sukkula analysis, while Nikita showed 0%–60% polymorphism. Moreover, in silico analyses also presented that these two retrotransposons are closely related to other chicken retrotransposons. Obtaining results could offer a practical approach for chicken genome analyses, especially for the identification of genes to obtain desired traits.

🔖

Cite This Article

MARAKLI, S., BÜLBÜL, C. E., BİLGİ, F., MERCAN, L. (2022). Determination of plant-specific retrotransposons in chicken. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 67–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/614535

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Mandal PK, Kazazian HH. SnapShot: vertebrate transposons. Cell 2008; 135 (1): 192-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.028 2. Cordaux R, Batzer MA. The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics 2009; 10 (10): 691-703. doi: 10.1038/nrg2640 3. Zhang HH, Peccoud J, Zhang XG, Gilbert C. Horizontal transfer and evolution of transposable elements in vertebrates. Nature Communications 2020; 11 (1): 1-10. doi: 10.1038/ s41467-020-15149-4 4. Ghonaim M, Kalendar R, Barakat H, Elsherif N, Ashry N et al. High-throughput retrotransposon-based genetic diversity of maize germplasm assessment and analysis. Molecular Biology Reports 2020; 47 (3): 1589-1603. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020- 05246-4 5. Ramos KS, Moore S, Runge I, Tavera-Garcia MA, Cascone I et al. The nucleolin antagonist N6L inhibits LINE1 retrotransposon activity in non-small cell lung carcinoma cells. Journal of Cancer 2020; 11 (3): 733-740. doi: 10.7150/jca.37776 6. Pettersson ME, Jern P. Whole-genome analysis of domestic chicken selection lines suggests segregating variation in ERV makeups. Genes 2019; 10 (2): 162. doi: 10.3390/genes10020162 7. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microbial Genomics 2017; 3 (10): e000132. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000132 8. Chen F, Dong W, Zhang J, Guo X, Chen J et al. The sequenced angiosperm genomes and genome databases. Frontiers in Plant Science 2018; 9: 418. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00418 9. Arumugam R, Uli JE, Annavi G. A review of the application of next generation sequencing (NGS) in wild terrestrial vertebrate research. Annual Research & Review in Biology 2019; 31 (5): 1-9. doi: 10.9734/arrb/2019/v31i530061 10. International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 2004; 432 (7018): 695-716. doi: 10.1038/nature03154 11. International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium. A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature 2004; 432 (7018): 717-722. doi: 10.1038/nature03156 12. Hughes AL, Piontkivska H. DNA repeat arrays in chicken and human genomes and the adaptive evolution of avian genome size. BMC Ecology and Evolution 2005; 5 (1): 12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-5-12 13. Cogburn LA, Porter TE, Duclos M, Simon J, Burgess SC et al. Functional genomics of the chicken—a model organism. Poultry Science 2007; 86 (10): 2059-20