SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Chemistry and Technology / 2021 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Variation of components in laurel (Laurus nobilis L.) fixed oil extracted by different methods

Musa TÜRKMEN
Oğuzhan KOÇER
Pages
167–171
Publication Date
2021-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, it was determined that the method of oil extraction in laurel was important.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study, it was aimed to determine the constituents of laurel fixed oil obtained from the different genotypes of laurel (Laurus nobilis L.), which is one of the natural plants of the region and which is widely found in the flora of Hatay, by traditional, cold press and soxhlet extraction methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When the GC/MS analysis results of these obtained oils were examined, the main components of the fixed oils in the traditional method were found as capric acid (2.49%), lauric acid (1.17%), myristic acid (0.16%), palmitic acid (13.69%), stearic acid (2.39%). ), oleic acid(55.01%), linoleic acid (10.56%) and linolenic acid(0.11%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, it was determined that the method of oil extraction in laurel was important.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Laurel · Laurus nobilis L. · GC-MS

Abstract

In the study, it was aimed to determine the constituents of laurel fixed oil obtained from the different genotypes of laurel (Laurus nobilis L.), which is one of the natural plants of the region and which is widely found in the flora of Hatay, by traditional, cold press and soxhlet extraction methods. When the GC/MS analysis results of these obtained oils were examined, the main components of the fixed oils in the traditional method were found as capric acid (2.49%), lauric acid (1.17%), myristic acid (0.16%), palmitic acid (13.69%), stearic acid (2.39%). ), oleic acid(55.01%), linoleic acid (10.56%) and linolenic acid(0.11%). In cold press method, fixed oil components was capric acid (0.24%), lauric acid(9.24%), myristic acid(0.98%), palmitic acid (18.41%), stearic acid (2.84%), oleic acid (38.59%), linoleic acid (23.67%) and linolenic acid (2.19%), while it was determined as capric acid (0.46%), lauric acid (11.16%), myristic acid (1.54%), palmitic acid (18.39%), stearic acid (3.58%), oleic acid (36.92%), linoleic acid (23.02%) and linolenic acid (2.54%) in soxhlet extraction method. As a result, while the components of laurel fixed oil did not change according to the fixed oil extraction methods, the amounts of these components changed. Therefore, it was determined that the method of oil extraction in laurel was important.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKMEN, M., KOÇER, O. (2021). Variation of components in laurel (Laurus nobilis L.) fixed oil extracted by different methods. International Journal of Chemistry and Technology, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 167–171. https://ajindex.com/articles/765652

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Koçer, O. 2021: TURAN-CSR. 2021, 13(50), 465-469.
  2. Baytop, T. İ.Ü., eczacılık fakültesi yayınları: Türkiye’de bitkiler ile tedavi, No:40, İstanbul, 1984.
  3. Acartürk, R. Ovak yayınları: şifalı bitkiler, flora ve sağlığımız, Yayın No:1, Ankara, 1997.
  4. Duke, J.A. CRC pres inc: CRC handbook of medicinal herbs, Florida, 1987.
  5. Özhatay, N.; Koyuncu, M.; Atay, S.; Byfıeld, A. Doğal hayatı koruma derneği: Türkiye’nin doğal tıbbi bitkilerinin ticareti hakkında bir çalışma, ISBN:975-96081- 9- 7, İstanbul, 1997.
  6. Sayyah, M.; Valizadeh, J.; Kamalinejad, M. Phytomedicine. 2002, 9, 212-216.
  7. Sayyah, M.; Saroukhani, G.; Peirovi, A.; Kamalinejad, M. Phytother res. 2003, 17, 733-736.
  8. Simic, M.; Kundakovic, T.; Kovacevic, N. Fitoterapia. 2004, 74(6), 613-616
  9. Rodilla, J. M.; Tinoco, M. T.; Morais, J. C.; Gimenez, C.; Cabrera, R.; Benito, D. M.; Castillo, L.; Gonzalez-Coloma, A. Biochemical systematics and ecology. 2008, 36, 167-176.
  10. Özer, S. Orman genel müdürlüğü yayını: ülkemizdeki bazı önemli orman tali ürünlerinin teşhis ve tanıtım klavuzu, Yayın No: 659, Seri No: 18, Ankara, 1987.
  11. Hammer, K.A.; Carson, C.F.; Rley, T.V. Journal of Applied Microbiology.1999, 86, 985-990.
  12. Driver, C.; Arroy, G. Phytochemistry.2001, 56, 229-236.
  13. Longo, L.; Vasapollo, G. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 8063-8067.
  14. Kuzucu, M. Fresen Environ Bull. 2017, 26 (12): 7521-7528.
  15. Kuzucu, M. JMEST. 2018, 5(12): 9303-9307.
  16. Kuzucu, M. Fresen Environ Bull. 2019, 28(1): 446-451.
  17. Kuzucu, M. IJENT. 2021, 5 (1):16-27 ISSN: 2602-4160.
  18. Baydar, H. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları. 2009, No. 51, Isparta, 234-235.
  19. Kayacık, H. Orman ve park ağaçlarının özel sistematiği: Cilt II, 1977.
  20. Boza, A. (2011). Karaburun Çeşme ve Dilek Yarımadası’nda Bulunan Doğal Defne (Laurus nobilis L.) Populasyonları Üzerinde Araştırmalar. Phd Dissertation, Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bahçe Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı, İzmir.
  21. Seçmen, Ö.; Gemici, Y.; Leblebici, E.; Görk, G.; Bekat, L. Ege üniversitesi fen fakültesi kitaplar serisi: tohumlu bitkiler sistematiği, No: 116, İzmir, 1992.
  22. Konukçu, M. Devlet planlama teşkilatı yayın ve temsil dairesi başkanlığı: ormanlar ve ormancılığımız. Yayın No. DPT: 2630, Ankara, 2001.
  23. Hafizoglu, H.; Reunanen, M. Lipid-Fett. 1993, 95:304--308. Beis, S.H.; Dunford, N.T. Seed Oil. JAOCS. 2006, Vol. 83, no. 11, 953-957.
  24. Timur, M. Defne Meyvesi Yağ Veriminin Arttırılması ve Bileşiminin Gaz Kromatografi Cihazı ile Belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, 2001 Castılho