Journals / International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

POLYGENIC RESISTANCE OF IMPROVED RED PEPPER LINES TO PHYTOPHTHORA CAPSICI

Pages
138–142
Publication Date
2019-06-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Molecular assisted selection was found useful for improving Phytophthora resistant red pepper lines.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Belonging to the Oomycete genus, Phytophthora capsici is responsible of many devastating disease and the most destructive agent of pepper in the World.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sena variety registered as suitable for spice pepper production was used as susceptible female donor and CM 334 and Perennial genotypes were used as male resistance sources.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Molecular assisted selection was found useful for improving Phytophthora resistant red pepper lines.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Phytophthora capsici · polygenic resistance · molecular markers

Abstract

Belonging to the Oomycete genus, Phytophthora capsici is responsible of many devastating disease and the most destructive agent of pepper in the World. The most cost-effective method for preventing Phytophthora blight is to use resistant cultivars. In this study, the polygenic resistance of improved pepper lines to Phytophthora Blight were screened by molecular markers placed on three chromosomes in pepper. Sena variety registered as suitable for spice pepper production was used as susceptible female donor and CM 334 and Perennial genotypes were used as male resistance sources. Thirty two genotypes were screened by ASC 035 marker placed on chromosomes P10, ASC 037 on P5 and ASC 031 on P2. Twelve of these improved red pepper lines from different resistance sources were exhibited polygenic resistance according to electrophoretic signals to all of three markers placed on P2, P5 and P10. In order to determine codominance of the resistance genes PCR products of ASC 031 and ASC 037 were restricted by HaeIII and EcoRI respectively. Ten improved lines exhibited codominance related with resistance to Phytophthora Blight concerning ASC 031 and only one line was showed codominance for ASC 037. Three different lines had one resistance gene on P5 and on P10 independently. Only T12 line holds two resistance genes both P2 and P10. DD and 63 lines were most promising genotypes related with their resistance to pathogen. Molecular assisted selection was found useful for improving Phytophthora resistant red pepper lines.

🔖

Cite This Article

Toğaç, S., Akıncı, S., Arpacı, B. B. (2019). POLYGENIC RESISTANCE OF IMPROVED RED PEPPER LINES TO PHYTOPHTHORA CAPSICI. International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 138–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/765542

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abak, K. 1982. Biberlerde Kökboğazı Yanıklığına dayanıklılığın kalıtımı üzerinde araştırmalar. A.Ü.Ziraat Fakültesi, Bakçe Bitkileri Bölümü, Doçentlik Tezi, Ankara.
  2. Choi, K. S., Young, H. O., Cang, H. L. and Jae, W. L. 1985. Studies On Varietal Differences and Inheritance of Resistance to Phytophtora capsici In Red Peppers Of Korea. Capsicum and Eggplant Newsletter, 5:39-40 p. Galmarini, C. R. 1997. Pepper Breeding in Argentina. Capsicum and Eggplant Newsletter. 16: 28-34.
  3. Guerrero-Moreno, A. and Laborde, J.A. 1980. Current Status of Pepper Breeding for Resistance to Phytophthora capsici in Mexico. IV. Meeting Eucarpian Capsicum Working Group. Wageningen: 52-56.
  4. İren, S., Maden, S., Patlıcangil, B., & Etmeni, K. T. B. Y. H. Phytopthora capsici Leon Enfeksiyonlarına Karşı Serada Reaksiyonlarının Tespiti. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yıllığı, 26, 323-330.
  5. Kim, E. S. and Hwang, B. K. 1992. Virulence to Korean pepper cultivars of isolates of Phytophthora capsici from different geographic aeras. Plant Disease 76:486-489.
  6. Kiran, O. F., & Ertunc, F. 1998. Detection of the Disease of Solanaceous Plants in Van Province. JOURNAL OF TURKISH PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 27, 105-112.
  7. Lee, B. K., Kim, B. S., Chang, S. W. and Hwang, B. K. 2001. Aggressiveness to pumpkin cultivars of isolates of Phytophthora capsici from pumpkin and pepper. Plant Dis. 85:497-500.
  8. Lefebvre, V. and Palloix, A. 1996. Both additive and Epistatic Effects of QTLs are Involved in Polygenic Induced Resistance to Diseases: A Case Study, the Interaction Pepper- Phytophthora capsici Leon. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93: 503-511.
  9. Leonian, LH. 1922. Stem and fruit blight of pepper caused by Phytophthora capsici sp. Nov. Phytopathology 12: 401-408.
  10. Metsalu, T., & Vilo, J. (2015). ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap. Nucleic acids research, 43(W1), W566-W570. Milkova, L., Vitanov, M. and Daskalov, S. 1988. Phytostop – A New Cultivar Resistant To Phytophtora capsici Capsicum and Eggplant Newsletter, 7: 62. Pochard E.1964.Piment. Rapport, d’Activite 1964.Stat. d’Amelior.Plantes Maraich. d’Avignon (France):41-46.
  11. Pochard, E. and Daubèze, A. M. 1982. Comparison of Three Different Sources of Resistance to Phytophthora capsici in Capsicum annuum. Capsicum and Eggplant Newsletter, 1: 59-62.
  12. Ruffel, S., Gallois, J. L., Moury, B., Robaglia, C., Palloix, A., & Caranta, C. (2006). Simultaneous mutations in translation initiation factors eIF4E and e