Journals / International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Examination of dairy cattle enterprises in Yozgat province in terms of structural characteristics and breeding conditions

Pages
289–297
Publication Date
2020-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Also, Simmental (59.07%) was commonly preferred in these enterprises. 80.9% of the shelters had tied stall, most of the shelters (92.7%) belong to the breeder, 97.3% of the ground material of the enterprises had concrete, 89.1% of the enterprises had a ventilation shaft, 35.5% of the wall structures were briquettes and 68.2% of the roof material was tile, 82.7% of windows was with 1-10 windows. 85.5% of the enterprises had not manure pit, 90.9% of the manure were own land, 84.5% of manure cleaning was done by hand and the distance of the manure pit to the milking unit was more than 11 meters. 80% of use base material was non-available and 84.5% of the enterprises do not have a birth section.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out by evaluating the information gathered through a survey on the enterprise, shelter structure workers, feeding, milking, breeding practices, demographic and economic patterns in 110 dairy farms from 14 districts in order to determine the structural characteristics of dairy farms in Yozgat province.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, most of the breeders were middle aged and older, 44.5% of them were graduated from primary school, 92.7% of households were with 1-4 people and 88.2% of them were contribution to livelihood. 77.3% of enterprise owners continued for more than 20 years and 89.1% of them had social security. 71.8% of the enterprises kept records of livestock, 57.3% of records kept by handwritten manual.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Also, Simmental (59.07%) was commonly preferred in these enterprises. 80.9% of the shelters had tied stall, most of the shelters (92.7%) belong to the breeder, 97.3% of the ground material of the enterprises had concrete, 89.1% of the enterprises had a ventilation shaft, 35.5% of the wall structures were briquettes and 68.2% of the roof material was tile, 82.7% of windows was with 1-10 windows. 85.5% of the enterprises had not manure pit, 90.9% of the manure were own land, 84.5% of manure cleaning was done by hand and the distance of the manure pit to the milking unit was more than 11 meters. 80% of use base material was non-available and 84.5% of the enterprises do not have a birth section.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dairy cattle production · structural features · dairy cattle shelters

Abstract

This study was carried out by evaluating the information gathered through a survey on the enterprise, shelter structure workers, feeding, milking, breeding practices, demographic and economic patterns in 110 dairy farms from 14 districts in order to determine the structural characteristics of dairy farms in Yozgat province. Examination, observation and measurements were made in each of the enterprises. Thus, the general status of dairy cattle in Yozgat province was evaluated in the light of the data collected through the survey, problems and deficiencies were identified and recommendations were made for their elimination. This study will be a source of information on the structural characteristics of dairy cattle enterprises at the provincial level, planning at the business level, and husbandry in Yozgat province. In the study, most of the breeders were middle aged and older, 44.5% of them were graduated from primary school, 92.7% of households were with 1-4 people and 88.2% of them were contribution to livelihood. 77.3% of enterprise owners continued for more than 20 years and 89.1% of them had social security. 71.8% of the enterprises kept records of livestock, 57.3% of records kept by handwritten manual. In these enterprises, way of construction of the barns and auxiliary facilities was own experience (83.6%), 73.6% of the enterprises had no employees, 82.7% of the employees were foreign labor. 72.7% of milking in the enterprises were the owner of the enterprise and family members. 70% of the enterprises studied were engaged in plant and animal production together. The highest ratio is those with 101-500 da of land (54.5%), the share of 0-50 da of land within irrigated land was 69.1%. Also, Simmental (59.07%) was commonly preferred in these enterprises. 80.9% of the shelters had tied stall, most of the shelters (92.7%) belong to the breeder, 97.3% of the ground material of the enterprises had concrete, 89.1% of the enterprises had a ventilation shaft, 35.5% of the wall structures were briquettes and 68.2% of the roof material was tile, 82.7% of windows was with 1-10 windows. 85.5% of the enterprises had not manure pit, 90.9% of the manure were own land, 84.5% of manure cleaning was done by hand and the distance of the manure pit to the milking unit was more than 11 meters. 80% of use base material was non-available and 84.5% of the enterprises do not have a birth section.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERMETİN, O. (2020). Examination of dairy cattle enterprises in Yozgat province in terms of structural characteristics and breeding conditions. International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 289–297. https://ajindex.com/articles/765472

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akkuş, Z. (2009). Konya ilindeki süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinin yapısal özellikleri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi,
  2. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya. Alkan, S., Güney, Z. (2019). Ordu ili sığırcılık işletmelerinin yapısal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 32(3): 1-1.
  3. Alkan, S., Ünlü, H. (2019). Giresun ilindeki sığırcılık işletmelerinin genel yapısının belirlenmesi. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences 32 (1): 109-115. Anonim, (2017). Yozgat İli Damızlık Sığır Yetiştiricileri Birliği kayıtları. Anonim, (2020).
  4. Tarım İstatistikleri, TUİK. (www.tuik.gov.tr), (Erişim Tarihi: 25.03.2020)
  5. Arıcı, İ., Şimşek, E., Yaslıoğlu, E. (2001). Süt sığırı ahırlarının planlaması. Sütaş Süt Hayvancılığı Eğitim Merkezi Yayınları Hayvancılık Serisi:4, Yetiştirici El Kitabı, Bursa. Arıcı, E., Yaslıoğlu, İ. (2005). Bursa bölgesinde süt sığırcılığına uygun soğuk ahır tiplerinin geliştirilmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2): 95-114.
  6. Arslan, Kızıldağ, A., (2012). Van ili Muradiye ilçesi süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinin yapısal sorunları ve çözüm önerileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi,
  7. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Erzurum. Arslanoğlu, K. (2019). Elazığ ilinde süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinin yapısal özellikleri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Fırat Üniversitesi,
  8. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Elazığ. Bardakçıoğlu H.E., Türkyılmaz M.K., Nazlıgül A. (2004). Aydın ili süt sığırcılık işletmelerinde kullanılan barınakların özellikleri üzerine bir araştırma, İstanbul Üniv. Vet. Fak. Derg, 30, 2: 51-62.
  9. Boz, İ. (2013). Doğu Akdeniz Bölgesi’nde süt sığırcılığı yapan işletmelerin yapısı, sorunları ve çözüm önerileri. KSÜ Doğa Bil. Derg. 16(1): 24-32.
  10. Çağı, U., Odabaşıoğlu, F. (2009). Antakya yöresi besi sığırcılığı işletmelerinin bilimsel değerlendirilmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 14(2): 69-82.
  11. Demir, P. (2011). Kars ilindeki süt üreticilerinin bazı teknik bilgi düzeylerinin araştırılması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Veteriner Bilimleri Dergisi 6(1): 47-54.
  12. Demir, P., Ayvazoğlu, C. (2012). Hayvancılık işletmelerinin veteriner hekimlik hizmetlerinden beklentileri: Kars ili örneği. Erciyes Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 9(3): 169-174.
  13. Demir, N., Sancar, C. (2012). Gümüşhane ili ve çevresinde süt sığırcılığı yapan işletmelerin sosyal, ekonomik ve teknik analizi. Alınteri 23(B): 18-28.
  14. Demirtaş. M. (2006). Manavgat ilçesi süt sığırcılığı işletmelerinin genel profili üzerine bir araştırma. Yüksek Lisans T