Journals / Hayvan Bilimi ve Ürünleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Retraction: Importance of Dietary Fiber in Poultry Nutrition

Geri çekildi: Importance of Dietary Fiber in Poultry Nutrition

Pages
21–29
Publication Date
2019-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A better understanding on the relation between specific fiber fractions and factors as GIT development, digesta retention time, and microbial colonization will help to develop nutritional strategies using specific fiber fractions to steer GIT health and function to enhance performance, especially under suboptimal environmental conditions.This article was retracted on June 10, 2021.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The scientific term of fiber is comprised of very diverse group of polymers having various physicochemical properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to more accurately predict the nutritive effect of fiber from raw materials, a better characterization of fiber fractions, their degradation in the chicken, and their physiological effects are required.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A better understanding on the relation between specific fiber fractions and factors as GIT development, digesta retention time, and microbial colonization will help to develop nutritional strategies using specific fiber fractions to steer GIT health and function to enhance performance, especially under suboptimal environmental conditions.This article was retracted on June 10, 2021.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Crude fiber · Neutral detergent fiber · Poultry nutrition

Abstract

The scientific term of fiber is comprised of very diverse group of polymers having various physicochemical properties. The dietary fiber can contribute remarkably to the nutritive value of poultry diets both directly, as energy source, and indirectly, through its effects on digestive and metabolic processes going on in the poultry bird. In order to more accurately predict the nutritive effect of fiber from raw materials, a better characterization of fiber fractions, their degradation in the chicken, and their physiological effects are required. Traditional analytical methods to analyze fiber, as crude fiber (CF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF), recover only a changeable fraction of fiber and are hence unfit for evaluation fiber fractions in raw materials and poultry diets. In poultry feeding the fiber gives less amount of energy because of its limited role in digestion however its slight increased proportion (up to 50 g/kg) can be productive for GIT development, thereby improving the digestion of nutrient and also posing good impact on growth and performance. A better understanding on the relation between specific fiber fractions and factors as GIT development, digesta retention time, and microbial colonization will help to develop nutritional strategies using specific fiber fractions to steer GIT health and function to enhance performance, especially under suboptimal environmental conditions.This article was retracted on June 10, 2021.

Özet

The scientific term of fiber is comprised of very diverse group of polymers having various physicochemical properties. The dietary fiber can contribute remarkably to the nutritive value of poultry diets both directly, as energy source, and indirectly, through its effects on digestive and metabolic processes going on in the poultry bird. In order to more accurately predict the nutritive effect of fiber from raw materials, a better characterization of fiber fractions, their degradation in the chicken, and their physiological effects are required. Traditional analytical methods to analyze fiber, as crude fiber (CF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF), recover only a changeable fraction of fiber and are hence unfit for evaluation fiber fractions in raw materials and poultry diets. In poultry feeding the fiber gives less amount of energy because of its limited role in digestion however its slight increased proportion (up to 50 g/kg) can be productive for GIT development, thereby improving the digestion of nutrient and also posing good impact on growth and performance. A better understanding on the relation between specific fiber fractions and factors as GIT development, digesta retention time, and microbial colonization will help to develop nutritional strategies using specific fiber fractions to steer GIT health and function to enhance performance, especially under suboptimal environmental conditions.Bu makale 10-06-2021 tarihinde geri çekildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

IQBAL, A., QUDOOS, A., ÇETİNGÜL, İ. S., SHAH, S. R. A., BAYRAM, İ. (2019). Retraction: Importance of Dietary Fiber in Poultry Nutrition. Hayvan Bilimi ve Ürünleri Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 21–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/763656

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Annison, G. 1992. Anti-nutritive effect of wheat pentosans in broiler chickens: roles of viscosity and gut microflora. British Poultry Science 33(4): 821–834.
  2. Annison, G. 1993. The role of wheat non-starch polysaccharides in broiler nutrition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44(3):405 - 422. Bach Knudsen, K. E. 2001. The nutritional significance of “dietary fibre” analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90 (1–2):3-20.
  3. Banfield, M. J., Kwakkel, R. P., Forbes, J. M. 2002. Effects of wheat structure and viscosity on coccidiosis in broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 98:37- 48. Batal, A. B., Parsons, C. M. 2002. Effects of age on nutrient digestibility in chicks fed different diets. Poultry Science 81(3):400-407.
  4. Branton, S. L., Lott, B. D., Deaton, J. W., Maslin, W. R., Austin, F. W., Pote, L. M. 1997. The effect of added complex carbohydrates or added dietary fiber on necrotic enteritis lesions in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 76(1): 24–28.
  5. Choct, M., Annison, G. 1992. The inhibition of nutrient digestion by wheat pentosans. British Journal of Nutrition. 67(1):123-132.
  6. Choct, M., Hughes, R. J., Wang, J., Bedford, M. R., Morgan, A. J., Annison, G. 1996. Increased small intestinal fermentation is partly responsible for the anti-nutritive activity of non-starch polysaccharides in chickens. British Poultry Science 37(3): 609–621.
  7. Dierick, N. A., Vervaeke, I. J., Demeyer, D. I., Decuypere, J. A. 1989. Approach to the energetic importance of fibre digestion in pigs. I. Importance of fermentation in the overall energy supply. Animal Feed Science and Technology 23 (1–3):141-167.
  8. Forman, L. P., Schneeman, B. O. 2018. Effects of Dietary Pectin and Fat on the Small Intestinal Contents and Exocrine Pancreas of Rats. The Journal of Nutrition 110(10): 1992–1999.
  9. Freitas, E. R., Watanabe, P. H., Eduardo, C., Cruz, B., Bezerra, R. M. 2014. Fiber level for laying hens during the growing phase. Ciênc. Agrotec., Lavras 38(2):188-198. González-Alvarado, J. M., Jiménez-Moreno, E., González-Sánchez, D., Lázaro, R., Mateos, G. G. 2010. Effect of inclusion of oat hulls and sugar beet pulp in the diet on productive performance and digestive traits of broilers from 1 to 42 days of age. Animal Feed Science and Technology 162 (1–2):37-46.
  10. Henchion, M., McCarthy, M., Resconi, V. C., Troy, D. 2014. Meat consumption: Trends and quality matters. Meat Science 98(3):561-568.
  11. Hetland, H., Choct, M., Svihus, B. 2004. Role of insoluble non-starch polysaccha