SavedAdd your journal

Journals / GRID - Mimarlık Planlama ve Tasarım Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

The Sociocultural Role of Architectural Types: Cultural Sustainability in Architecture and the Possibility of Convention

Mimari Tiplerin Sosyokültürel Rolü: Kültürel Sürdürülebilirlik ve Geleneğin Sunduğu Olanaklar

Zeynep Çiğdem UYSAL ÜREY
Pages
83–99
Publication Date
2019-01-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, the study questions if the use of architectural types has a cognitive basis in the creation of a sustainable cultural milieu.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study looks at the issue of cultural sustainability in architecture from the perspective of architectural types and attempts to question the cognitive viability of using types in the creation of a sustainable cultural milieu.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study conducts a multi-disciplinary and cross-comparative discourse analysis on the subject areas of cultural sustainability, cultural schemas and architectural types, in an attempt to find out the social and cognitive role of architectural types with regard to cultural sustainability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, the study questions if the use of architectural types has a cognitive basis in the creation of a sustainable cultural milieu.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kültürel sürdürülebilirlik · kültürel şemalar · mimari tipler

Abstract

This study looks at the issue of cultural sustainability in architecture from the perspective of architectural types and attempts to question the cognitive viability of using types in the creation of a sustainable cultural milieu. The study conducts a multi-disciplinary and cross-comparative discourse analysis on the subject areas of cultural sustainability, cultural schemas and architectural types, in an attempt to find out the social and cognitive role of architectural types with regard to cultural sustainability. Examining these subject areas comparatively, the study respectively investigates the role of cultural schemas in cultural sustainability, the correlation of architectural types and cultural schemas, and the social and cognitive role of architectural types in the formation of cultural sustainability. Consequently, the study questions if the use of architectural types has a cognitive basis in the creation of a sustainable cultural milieu.

Özet

Bu çalışma, mimarlıkta kültürel sürdürülebilirlik konusuna, mimari tipler perspektifinden bakmakta ve sürdürülebilir bir kültürel ortamın yaratılmasında tip kullanımının bilişsel geçerliliğini sorgulamaya çalışmaktadır. Çalışma, kültürel sürdürülebilirlik açısından mimari tiplerin sosyal ve bilişsel rolünü ortaya çıkarmak amacıyla, kültürel sürdürülebilirlik, kültürel şemalar ve mimari tip konularına ilişkin çok disiplinli ve karşılaştırmalı bir söylem analizi yürütmektedir. Bu konuları karşılaştırmalı olarak inceleyen çalışmada, sırasıyla kültürel şemaların kültürel sürdürülebilirlik üzerindeki rolü, mimari tiplerin ve kültürel şemaların ilişkisi ve kültürel sürdürülebilirliğin oluşumunda mimari tiplerin sosyal ve bilişsel rolü incelenmektedir. Sonuç olarak, mimari tiplerin kullanımının sürdürülebilir bir kültürel ortamın yaratılmasında bilişsel bir temele sahip olup olmadığı sorusu cevaplanmaya çalışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜREY, Z. Ç. U. (2019). The Sociocultural Role of Architectural Types: Cultural Sustainability in Architecture and the Possibility of Convention. GRID - Mimarlık Planlama ve Tasarım Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 83–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/762132

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Argan, G. C. (1996). On the typology of architecture. In K. Nesbitt (Ed.), Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture: An Anthology of Architectural Theory 1965-1995 (pp. 240-248). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  2. Assi, E. (2001, December). Typological analysis of Palestinian traditional court house. Paper presented at the International congress of UNESCO – ICOMOS, Paris. Axelsson, R., Angelstam, P., Degerman, E., Teitelbaum, S., Andersson, K., Elbakidze, M. & Drotz, M. K. (2013). "Social and Cultural Sustainability: Criteria, Indicators, Verifier Variables for Measurement and Maps for Visualization to Support Planning". AMBIO. 42 (2): 215–228. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0376-0.
  3. Bonta, J. P. (1979). Architecture and its interpretation. New York: Rizzoli. Colquhoun, A. (1996). “Typology and Design Method”. In K. Nesbitt (Ed.), Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture: An Anthology of Architectural Theory 1965-1995 (pp. 248-258). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  4. Collins, P. (1971). Architectural judgment. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. D’Andrade, R. (1987). “A folk model of the mind”. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models of language and thought (pp. 112-151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. D’Andrade, R. (1989). “Cultural cognition”. In M. Posner (Ed.), The foundation of cognitive science (pp. 795-830). Cambridge: The MIT Press. D’Andrade, R. (1992). Schemas and motivation. In R. D’andrade & C. Strauss (Eds.), Human motives and cultural models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263-87.
  6. Donald, M. (1998b). “Material culture and cognition: concluding thoughts”. In C. Renfrew & C. Scarre (Ed.s.), Cognition and Material Culture: The Archeology of Symbolic Storage, Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archeological Research. Du Gay, P., Hall, S., Jones, L., Mackay, H., & Negus, K. (Ed.s.). (1997). Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman (pp. 10-18). London: Sage publications. Habraken, N. J. (1985). The appearance of the form: four essays on the position designing takes place between people and things. Cambridge, MA: Awater Press.
  7. Hall, S. (1997). Representation: cultural representation and signifying practices. London: Sage Publications. Holland, D. & Quinn, N. (1987). Culture and cognition. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Ed.s), Cultural models of language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Hylland-Eriksen, T. (2001). S