SavedAdd your journal

Journals / EUropean Journal of Managerial Research (EUJMR) / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 7

FACTORS AFFECTING INDIVIDUAL HOUSING SATISFACTION: AN ANALYSIS OF A STRUCTURAL EQUALITY MODELING

BİREYSEL HANE MEMNUNİYETİNİ ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER: BİR YAPISAL EŞİTLİK MODELİ

Şerafettin KELEŞ
Pages
168–188
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Structural Equation Model results showed that the “Demographic Structure” variable had a positive low level effect (γ = 0.19; t = 3.25) on housing satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Individual housing satisfaction is a variable concept according to the relative meaning and importance attributed to the dwelling.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Horizontal cut data obtained from 383 surveys conducted in 2018 with individuals residing in Erzincan center were analyzed by Structural Equation Modeling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Structural Equation Model results showed that the “Demographic Structure” variable had a positive low level effect (γ = 0.19; t = 3.25) on housing satisfaction.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Housing Satisfaction · Housing Location · Housing Environment

Özet

Individual housing satisfaction is a variable concept according to the relative meaning and importance attributed to the dwelling. It expresses a subjective feeling according to the perception and desires of the individuals. Housing satisfaction shows the extent to which the ideal residence that the owner or user lives with and the current residence that he / she lives with. In this study, the satisfaction of the residents of Erzincan center was investigated using many variables. Horizontal cut data obtained from 383 surveys conducted in 2018 with individuals residing in Erzincan center were analyzed by Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Model results showed that the “Demographic Structure” variable had a positive low level effect (γ = 0.19; t = 3.25) on housing satisfaction. The “Housing Location” variable affects the satisfaction of the house positively and at a high level (γ = 0.83; t = 13.93). The variable “Housing Environment” has a positive and high level effect on housing satisfaction (γ = 0.90; t = 10.69). The “Housing Architecture” variable affects the housing satisfaction (γ = 0.95; t = 14.02) positively and at a very high level. Again, the "Housing Characteristics " variable affects the satisfaction of the house at a high level and positively (γ = 0.90; t = 17.22). There was no interaction between the variable "Socioeconomic Structure" and housing satisfaction.

🔖

Cite This Article

KELEŞ, Ş. (2020). FACTORS AFFECTING INDIVIDUAL HOUSING SATISFACTION: AN ANALYSIS OF A STRUCTURAL EQUALITY MODELING. EUropean Journal of Managerial Research (EUJMR), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 7, 168–188. https://ajindex.com/articles/757788

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. AIGBAVBOA, C., & THWALA, W. (2018). Residential Satisfaction and Housing Policy Evolution. Routledge. ARGYLE, M. (1987). The Psychology of Happiness. New York, NY: Methuen. BENTLER, P., & YUAN, K. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate behavioral research, 34(2), 181-197.
  2. BORDENS, K., & ABBOTT, B. (2011). Research design and methods: A process approach. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies. CAMPBELL, A., & CONVERSE, P. (1972). The human meaning of social change. Russell Sage Foundation. CARVALHO, M., GEORGE, R., & ANTHONY, K. (1997). Residential satisfaction in condominios exclusivos (gate-guarded neighborhoods) in Brazil. Environment and Behavior, 29(6), 734-768.
  3. CHEUNG, G., & RENSVOLD, R. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233-255.
  4. CLARK, W., & ONAKA, J. (1983). Life Cycle And Housing Adjustment As Explanations Of Residential Mobility. Urban Studies,, 20, 47-57.
  5. DIENER, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. In The science of well-being, 11-58.
  6. FRANCESCATO, G. (1998). Residential Satisfaction. Encyclopedia of Housing. W.V Vliet (Ed.). (s. 484-486). içinde London: Sage. FRANCESCATO, G., WEIDEMANN, G., & ANDERSON, J. (1974). Evaluating Residents’s Satisfaction In Housing For Low And Moderate Income Famıly: A Multi Method Approach. Washington. FRANCESCATO, G., WEIDEMANN, S., & ANDERSON, J. (1987). Residential Satisfaction: it uses and limitations in housing research, Housing and neighborhoods. New York: Greenwood Press.
  7. GALSTER, C. (1987). Identifying the Correlates of Dwelling Satisfaction: An Empirical Critique. Environment and Behavior,, 19, 539-568.
  8. GALSTER, C., HESSER, G., & GARRY, W. (1981). Residential Satisfaction. Environment And Behavior, 13(6), 735-758.
  9. GE, J., & HOKAO, K. (2006). Research on Residential Lifestyles in Japanese Cities from the Viewpoints of Residential Preference, Residential Choice and Residential Satisfaction. Landscape Urban Plan,, 78(3), 165-178.
  10. GÜR, M., & ŞENKAL SEZER, F. (2018). Popularity in house preference-A research on user satisfaction: Bursa Balat Sample. International Refereed Journal of Architecture and Design, 14(1), 1-27.
  11. HERSHBERGER, S. L. (2003). The growth of structural equation modeling: 1994-2001. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(1), 35-46.
  12. İLHAN, M., & ÇETIN, B. (2014). Comparing the Analysis Results of the Structural Equation Models (SEM) Conducted Using LISREL and AMOS. Journal of Measu