Journals / Elektronik Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 16

AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDIES ON THE APOS THEORY

APOS Teorisine Yönelik Çalışmaların Bir Analizi

Pages
242–251
Publication Date
2019-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the framework of the findings obtained in the study, suggestions were made about the APOS theory.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to examine scientific researches about APOS (Action-Process-Object-Schema) theory written between 2000-2019.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The studies reached from these databases in 2000-2019 were included in the research scope.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the framework of the findings obtained in the study, suggestions were made about the APOS theory.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Matematik eğitimi · APOS teorisi · zihinsel yapılar

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to examine scientific researches about APOS (Action-Process-Object-Schema) theory written between 2000-2019. The research was descriptive and the situation was determined. While searching the literature, Web of Science, ERIC, EBSCO and ULAKBİM databases which are the most searched internationally were preferred. The studies reached from these databases in 2000-2019 were included in the research scope. In this respect, in the literature study, twelve Turkish and twenty-nine foreign researches were reached. Forty one of these researches were analyzed according to the criteria of university, country, year, sample group, education level of the sample and research method published by document analysis method. The findings were tabulated with the help of frequencies and presented to the reader. The studies result in Turkey, where twelve studies in this area, which abroad the intensity of the work, according to the year in which the similarity of the number of studies is made mostly on college students' research, the similarity of the number of working on the grade level and according to quantitative and mixed research of qualitative studies density was reached. In the framework of the findings obtained in the study, suggestions were made about the APOS theory.

Özet

Bu çalışmada 2000-2019 yılları arasında yazılmış olan APOS (Action-Process-Object-Schema) (Eylem–Süreç– Nesne–Şema) teorisine yönelik bilimsel araştırmaları incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma betimsel nitelikte olup durum tespiti yapılmıştır. Alanyazın taraması yapılırken uluslararası alanda en çok taranan Web of Science, ERIC, EBSCO ve ULAKBİM veri tabanları tercih edilmiş, Bu veri tabanlarından 2000-2019 yıllarında ulaşılan çalışmalar araştırma kapsamına dâhil edilmiştir. Bu doğrultuda yapılan literatür çalışmasında on iki adet Türkçe ve yirmi dokuz adet yabancı araştırmaya ulaşılmıştır. Ulaşılan bu kırk bir araştırma doküman analizi yöntemiyle yayınlanan üniversite, ülke, yıl, örneklem grubu, örneklemin öğrenim seviyesi ve araştırma metodu kriterlerine göre incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular frekanslar yardımıyla tablolaştırılarak okuyucuya sunulmuştur. Yapılan çalışma sonucunda Türkiye’de bu alanda on iki adet çalışma olduğu, çalışmaların yoğunlukla yurt dışında bulunduğu, yıllara göre çalışma sayılarının benzerlik gösterdiği, araştırmaların çoğunlukla üniversite öğrencileri üzerinde yapıldığı, sınıf düzeyine göre çalışma sayılarının benzerlik gösterdiği ve nitel çalışmaların nicel ve karma araştırmalara göre daha yoğunlukta olduğu sonuçlarına ulaşılmıştır. Çalışmada elde edilen bulgular çerçevesinde APOS teorisine ilişkin önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAKTAR, F., TUTAK, T., İLHAN, A. (2019). AN ANALYSIS OF THE STUDIES ON THE APOS THEORY. Elektronik Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 16, 242–251. https://ajindex.com/articles/753820

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Açıl, E. (2015). Investigation of abstraction processes for equation concept of middle school 3rd grade students: APOS theory. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Atatürk University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Erzurum. Alacacı, C. (2017). Subject-Oriented Pedagogical Field Knowledge for Mathematics. 3rd TURKISH Computer and Math Education Symposium 17 - 19 May 2017 Afyon “Mathematics and Democracy” Abstracts. Asiala, M., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E. & Schwingendorf, E.K. (1997). The development of students’ graphical understanding of the derivative. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(4), 399-431.
  2. Asiala, M., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D.M., Morics, S. & Oktac, A. (1997). Development of students’ understanding of cosets, normality, and quotient groups. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(3), 241-309.
  3. Baker, W.J., Czarnocha, B., Dias, O. & Doyle, K. (2012). Kennis procedural and conceptual knowledge: adults reviewing fractions. Alm International Journal, 7(2), 39-65.
  4. Baki, A. & Güç, F.A. (2014). Ninth grade students’ misconceptions about cyclic decimal representation. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 176-206.
  5. Barak, B. (2007). Determination of misconceptions about limit. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Balıkesir University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Balıkesir. Bergsten, C. (2008). On the influence of theory on research in mathematics education: the case of teaching and learning limits of functions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40(1), 189-199.
  6. Çetin, H. (2009). A study on the relation between proportional reasoning skills and the successes of solving equation of elementary school secondary stage students. Published Master Thesis, Selçuk University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Konya. Deniz, Ö. & Kabael, T. (2014). Examining the process of forming gradient of 8th grade students in the APOS theoretical framework. Education and Science, 42(192), 139-172.
  7. Dubinsky, E. (1991). Constructive aspects of reflective abstraction in advanced mathematics; Epistomological Foundations of Mathematical Experience. New York: Springer-Verlag, 160-187.
  8. Dubinsky, E. & McDonald, M.A. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In D. Holton (Ed.), The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level: An ICME Study (pp. 275-282). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  9. Dubınsky, E., Weller, K., Mcdonald, M.A. & Brown, A. (2005). Some hıstorıcal issues and pa