Journals / Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

EXAMINATIONS OF IMPACTS OF EMPOWERING LEADERSHIP ON INNOVATION ACTIVITIES IN SERVICE SECTOR AND EMPLOYEES - GÜÇLENDİRİCİ LİDERLİĞİN, HİZMET SEKTÖRÜNDEKİ YENİLİK FAALİYETLERİNE VE ÇALIŞANLARA ETKİLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

GÜÇLENDİRİCİ LİDERLİĞİN, HİZMET SEKTÖRÜNDEKİ YENİLİK FAALİYETLERİNE VE ÇALIŞANLARA ETKİLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ - EXAMINATIONS OF IMPACTS OF EMPOWERING LEADERSHIP ON INNOVATION ACTIVITIES IN SERVICE SECTOR AND EMPLOYEES

Pages
326–353
Publication Date
2020-07-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the findings are analyzed, it was found that empowering leadership and proactive personality variables had positive effects on career satisfaction, innovation and creativity activities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The organizations in service sector in intense competition environment fall behind as a result of not showing performance in desired level and have to leave from the sector.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the scope of the study, survey were conducted with 483 white-collar workers (administrative personnel) who work in the service sector.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When the findings are analyzed, it was found that empowering leadership and proactive personality variables had positive effects on career satisfaction, innovation and creativity activities.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Proaktif Kişilik · Hizmet Yeniliği · Kariyer Memnuniyeti

Abstract

The organizations in service sector in intense competition environment fall behind as a result of not showing performance in desired level and have to leave from the sector. In terms of leadership styles, it is necessary to manage the satisfaction and team management with the right understanding in the superior-subordinate relationship hierarchy of the organizations. By managing and guiding employees correctly, organizations can achieve their goals that they set. The research model examines how institutions in the service sector affect employees and innovation through the empowering influence of leadership. When the findings are analyzed, it was found that empowering leadership and proactive personality variables had positive effects on career satisfaction, innovation and creativity activities. Within the scope of the study, survey were conducted with 483 white-collar workers (administrative personnel) who work in the service sector. IBM SPSS 25 Statistical Software Program and SPSS AMOS were used to make analysis. Since there were 5-point Likert-scale questions in the study, confirmatory and explanatory factor analysis was conducted. After factor analysis, reliability analysis, correlation analysis, regression analysis, and Sobel test was made for the analysis of hypothesis and regression analysis.

Özet

Yoğun rekabet ortamında hizmet sektöründe bulunan firmalar istenilen seviyede performans sergileyememeleri sonucunda yarışta geriye düşmekte ve sektörden çıkmak zorunda kalmaktadırlar. Özellikle liderlik açısından örgütlerin ast-üst hiyerarşisinde memnuniyet ve ekip yönetiminin doğru bir anlayışla yönetilmesi gerekmektedir. Çalışanların doğru yönetilmesi ve yönlendirilmesiyle, örgütler belirledikleri hedeflere ulaşmaları mümkün olabilmektedir. Hizmet sektöründe bulunan kurumların, liderliğin güçlendirici etkisiyle çalışanları ve yeniliği nasıl etkilediği araştırma modeli kapsamında incelenmektedir. Elde edilen bulgular analiz edildiğinde, Güçlendirici liderlik ve proaktif kişilik değişkenlerinin, kariyer memnuniyetine, takım yaratıcılığına ve yenilik faaliyetlerine olumlu yönde etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Araştırmanın amacı kapsamında hizmet sektöründe bulunan 483 beyaz yakalı (idari personel)’dan veriler toplanmıştır. IBM SPSS 25 Programı ve SPSS AMOS kullanılarak Analizler yapılmıştır. Anket çalışmasında 5’li Likert ölçekli sorular olduğu için Doğrulayıcı ve açıklayıcı faktör analizi yapılmış, faktör analizinden sonra güvenirlilik analizi, korelasyon analizi, regresyon analizi ve ara değişken etkisi için sobel testi yapılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ADIGÜZEL, Z., CAYAN, Y. (2020). EXAMINATIONS OF IMPACTS OF EMPOWERING LEADERSHIP ON INNOVATION ACTIVITIES IN SERVICE SECTOR AND EMPLOYEES - GÜÇLENDİRİCİ LİDERLİĞİN, HİZMET SEKTÖRÜNDEKİ YENİLİK FAALİYETLERİNE VE ÇALIŞANLARA ETKİLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 326–353. https://ajindex.com/articles/75281

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. AHEARNE, M., MATHIEU, J., & RAPP, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied psychology, 90(5), 945. AMABILE, T.M., SCHATZEL, E.A., MONETA, G.B., & KRAMER, S.J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5-32.
  2. ANDERSON, N., DE DREU, C.K., & NIJSTAD, B.A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state‐of‐the‐science. Journal of organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147-173.
  3. Arnold, J.A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J.A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249-269.
  4. AROİAN, L.A. (1944/1947). The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 265-271.
  5. BARRICK, M.R. (2005). Yes, personality matters: Moving on to more important matters. Human performance, 18(4), 359-372.
  6. BASADUR, M. (2004). Leading others to think innovatively together: Creative leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 103-121.
  7. BATEMAN, T.S., & CRANT, J.M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of organizational behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
  8. BINDL, U.K., PARKER, S.K., TOTTERDELL, P., & HAGGER-JOHNSON, G. (2012). Fuel of the self-starter: How mood relates to proactive goal regulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 134. BOIES, K., & ROTHSTEIN, M.G. (2002). Managers’ interest in international assignments: The role of work and career satisfaction. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26(3), 233-253.
  9. CHEN, J.S., TSOU, H.T., & CHING, R.K. (2011). Co-production and its effects on service innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1331-1346.
  10. CHESBROUGH, H. (2003). The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property. California management review, 45(3), 33-58.
  11. CHESBROUGH, H. (2010). Open services innovation: Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era. John Wiley & Sons. CHESBROUGH, H., VANHAVERBEKE, W., & WEST, J. (EDS.). (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press on Demand. CHOI, J.N. (2007). Change‐oriented organizational citizenship behavior: effects of work environment characteri