SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND STRUCTURE

BİLGİ YÖNETİMİ VE ÖRGÜTSEL ETKİNLİK İLİŞKİSİ: ÖRGÜT KÜLTÜRÜ VE ÖRGÜT YAPISININ TEMEL ETKİLERİ

Nigar Demircan ÇAKAR
Sibel YILDIZ
Serkan DUR
Pages
71–93
Publication Date
2010-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Multiple regression analyses and hierarchical regression models demonstrated that organizational culture and structure affect knowledge management processes and these processes increase organizational effectiveness if managed properly

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Organizational culture is defined as an organization’s shared values and concerned as a precondition for knowledge management processes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Supportive organizational culture and structure may also enable to increase organizational effectiveness.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Multiple regression analyses and hierarchical regression models demonstrated that organizational culture and structure affect knowledge management processes and these processes increase organizational effectiveness if managed properly
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bilgi yönetimi · örgüt kültürü · örgüt yapısı

Abstract

Organizational culture is defined as an organization’s shared values and concerned as a precondition for knowledge management processes. Supportive organizational culture and structure may also enable to increase organizational effectiveness. The purpose of this research is to examine the effects of organizational culture and structure on knowledge management processes as well as organizational effectiveness. Additionally, in this study direct effects of knowledge management processes on organizational effectiveness are also investigated. The research process was conducted using structured questionnaires, and the sample included employees from auditing and banking sectors. Multiple regression analyses and hierarchical regression models demonstrated that organizational culture and structure affect knowledge management processes and these processes increase organizational effectiveness if managed properly

Özet

Örgüt kültürü temelde paylaşılan değerler bütünü olarak tanımlanır ve bilgi yönetimi süreci için ön koşul niteliği taşır. Destekleyici nitelikte bir örgüt kültürü ve örgüt yapısı ile örgütsel bilgi yönetimi kolaylaşabilir ve örgütsel etkinlik de artırılabilir. Bu araştırmanın amacı örgüt kültürü ve örgüt yapısının bilgi yönetimi süreçleri ve örgütsel etkinliği ne şekilde etkilediğini ortaya koymaktır. Bunun yanında bu çalışmada bilgi yönetimi süreçlerinin örgütsel etkinlik üzerindeki doğrudan etkileri de araştırılmaktadır. Araştırma süreci anket çalışması ile yürütülmüş, örneklemi denetim ve bankacılık sektöründen çalışanlar oluşturmuştur. Çoklu regresyon analizleri ve hiyerarşik regresyon modelleri örgütsel yapı ve örgüt kültürünün bilgi yönetimi süreçleri üzerinde etkili olduğunu, bilgi yönetimi süreçlerinin de örgütsel etkinliği artırdığını ortaya çıkarmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKAR, N. D., YILDIZ, S., DUR, S. (2010). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND STRUCTURE. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 71–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/752154

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aidla, A. and Vadi, M. (2007): “Relationships between Organizational Culture and Performance in Estonian Schools with Regard to Their Size and Location”, Baltic Journal of Economics, 7(1): 3-17.
  2. Almeida, P. (1996): “Knowledge Resourcing by Foreign Multinationals: Patent Citation Analysis in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry”, Strategic Management Journal, 7:155-165.
  3. Aktan, C.C., and Vural, İ.Y.(2004). “Bilgi Yönetimi Nedir?”,http://www.canaktan.org/yeni-trendler/bilgi-yonetimi/bilgi-yon-nedir.htm
  4. Appleyard, M.M. (1996): “How does Knowledge Flow? Interfirm Patterns in the Semiconductor Industry”, Strategic Management Journal, 7: 137-154.
  5. Argote, L, and Ingram, P. (2000); “Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision, 82(1):150- 169 Audretsch, D. B. (2001): “Research Issues Relating to Structure, Competition, and Performance of Small Technology-Based Firms”, Small Business Economics, 16(1): 37–51.
  6. Awad, E. and Ghaziri, H. (2004): Knowledge Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Publishing. 8-32.
  7. Bailey, C. and Clarke, M. (2000): “How do Managers Use Knowledge about Knowledge Management?”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3):235-243. Barca M., and Geyik M. (2004); “Etkin Bilgi Üretimi İçin Örgütler Nasıl Tasarlanmalıdır?”, http://iibf.ogu.edu.tr/kongre/bildiriler/10-02.pdf Barquin R.C.: Bennet A., and Remez S.G. (2001): Knowledge Management: The Catalyst for E-Government, Vienna, VA: Management Concepts, Inc., forcoming. Barutçugil, İ. (2002): Bilgi yönetimi. İstanbul: Kariyer Yayıncılık. 7-16.
  8. Bassi, J.B. (1997); “Intellectual Capital”, Training & Development, December: 25-30.
  9. Beijerse, R. P. (1999): “Questions in Knowledge Management: Defining and Conceptualizing a Phenomenon”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(2): 94- 109. Bharadwaj, S., Bhushan S., and Saxena, C., (2005): “Knowledge Management in Global Software Teams”, Vikalpa, 30(4): 65-75.
  10. Bogenrieder, I., and Nooteboom, B. (2004): “Learning groups: What types are there? A theoretical analysis and an empirical study in a consultancy firm”. Organization Studies, 25(2), 287–313.
  11. Brooking, A. (1997): “The Management of Intellectual Capital”, Long, Range Planning, 30(3): 364-365.
  12. Bülbül, H. (2008): “Bilgi yönetim modellerinin üretim ve firma performansına etkisi”,http://www.sosyalbil.selcuk.edu.tr/sos_mak
  13. Büyüköztürk, Ş.(2002):
  14. Veri Analizi El Kitabı, Pegem A. Yayıncılık. Ankara. 10- 48. Carneiro, A. (2000): “How Does Knowledge Management Influ