SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies / 2005 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Örgütsel İletişim ve Bağlılığın, Örgütsel Kimlik Algısı Üzerindeki Etkileri: Sektörel Bir Karşılaştırma

The Effects of Organizational Communication and Commitment on Organizational Identification: A Sectoral Comparison

Alper ERTÜRK
NİGAR DEMİRCAN ÇAKAR
Adnan CEYLAN
Pages
81–98
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study has also some conclusions about the roles of organizational communication and commitment in fostering organizational identification.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the effects of organizational communication and commitment on organizational identification.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the analysis, career communication is found to be related significantly to organizational identification in the service industry, while task communication is related significantly to organizational identification in the manufacturing industry.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study has also some conclusions about the roles of organizational communication and commitment in fostering organizational identification.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study examines the effects of organizational communication and commitment on organizational identification. We draw samples from organizations operating in service and manufacturing industries. In the analysis, career communication is found to be related significantly to organizational identification in the service industry, while task communication is related significantly to organizational identification in the manufacturing industry. The results also suggest that affective commitment, when combined with organizational communication and identification, fully mediates the relationship between organizational communication and employees' identification with the organization. This study has also some conclusions about the roles of organizational communication and commitment in fostering organizational identification.

Özet

Bu çalışma, örgütsel iletişim ve bağlılığın örgütsel kimlik algısı üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. Hizmet ve imalat endüstrisinde faaliyet gösteren firmalar örnekleme dahil edilmiştir. Yapılan analiz neticesinde, imalat endüstrisinde görev iletişimi örgütsel kimlik algısı üzerinde anlamlı etkiye sahipken, hizmet endüstrisinde kariyer iletişiminin örgütsel kimlik algısı üzerinde anlamlı etkisinin olduğu bulunmuştur. Bunların yanında sonuçlar, örgütsel iletişim ve kimlik algısı ile birlikte ele alındığında, duygusal bağlılığın örgütsel iletişim ve çalışanların kimlik algısı arasında tam ara değişken etkisi yarattığını göstermiştir. Bu çalışmada ayrıca, örgütsel iletişim ve bağlılığın örgütsel kimlik algısını artırıcı yöndeki etkileri de tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTÜRK, A., ÇAKAR, N. D., CEYLAN, A. (2005). Örgütsel İletişim ve Bağlılığın, Örgütsel Kimlik Algısı Üzerindeki Etkileri: Sektörel Bir Karşılaştırma. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 81–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/148641

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Albert, S. and Whetten, D.A. (1985). "Organizational Identity," in L.L.Cummings and B.M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 7: 263-296.
  2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  3. Ashforth, B.E. and Mael, F. (1989). "Social Identity Theory and the Organization," Academy of Management Review, 14: 20-39.
  4. Barker, J.R. and Tompkins, P.K. (1994). "Identification in the Self-Managing Organization: Characteristics of Target and Tenure," Human Communication Research, 21: 223-240.
  5. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986) "The Mediator-Moderator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations," Journal of Personality and'Social Psychology, 51: 1173-1182.
  6. Blau, G.J. and Boal, K.M. (1987). "Conceptualizing How Job Involvement and Organizational Commitment Affect Turnover and Absenteeism," Academy of Management Review, 12(2): 288-300.
  7. Brewer, M.B. (1981). "Ethnocentrism and Its Role in Interpersonal Trust," in M.B. Brewer and B.E.Collins (eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences: 345-360, New York: Jossey-Bass. Brewer, M.B. and Kramer, R.M. (1986). "Choice Behavior in Social Dilemmas: Effects of Social Identity, Group Size and Decision Framing," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 543-549.
  8. Bullis, C.A. and Tompkins, P.K. (1989). "The Forest Rangers Revisited: A Study of Control Practices and Identification," Communication Monographs, 56: 287-306.
  9. Bullis, C.A. and Bach, B.W. (1989). "Socialization Turning Points: An Examination of Change in Organizational Identification," Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53: 273-293.
  10. Caldwell, D.E, Chatman, J.A. and O'Reilly, C.A. (1990). "Building Organizational Commitment: A Multifirm Study," Journal of Occupational Psychology, September: 245-261.
  11. Cheney, G. (1983). "The Rhetoric of Identification and the Study of Organizational Communication," Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69(2): 143-158.
  12. Cheney, G. and Tömpkins, P.K. (1987). "Coming to Terms with Organizational Identification and Commitment," Central States Speech Journal, 38: 1-15.
  13. Chreim, S. (2002). "Influencing Organizational Identification during Major Change: A Communication-Based Perspective," Human Relations, 55(9): 1117-1137.
  14. Clampitt, P.G. and Downs, C.W. (1993). "Employee Perceptions of the Relationship between Communication and Productivity: A Field Study," Journal of Business Communication, 30(1): 5-28.
  15. Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. (1983). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the