SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Market Structure and Profitability Relationship in the Turkish Banking Industry

Türk Bankacılık Endüstrisinde Piyasa Yapısı ve Karlılık İlişkisi

Gürkan ÇALMAŞUR
Hüseyin DAŞTAN
Pages
363–378
Publication Date
2016-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, it is determined that structureconduct-performance, relative-market-power and efficiency structure: scale efficiency hypotheses are firmly held and quiet life hypothesis is strongly held in the industry

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study is to test five hypotheses that have been proposed in the literature on the relationship between market structure and profitability of the banks operating in the Turkish banking industry during the period of 2001-2014.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To achieve this objective, 42 banks’ panel data used in the study for the period of 2001-2014, structureconduct-performance, relative-market-power, efficient structure: X efficiency, efficiency structure: scale efficiency and quiet life hypotheses are tested by performing generalised least squares regression.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, it is determined that structureconduct-performance, relative-market-power and efficiency structure: scale efficiency hypotheses are firmly held and quiet life hypothesis is strongly held in the industry
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001-2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Etkinlik · Piyasa Yapısı · Karlılık Türk Bankacılık Endüstrisi

Abstract

The objective of this study is to test five hypotheses that have been proposed in the literature on the relationship between market structure and profitability of the banks operating in the Turkish banking industry during the period of 2001-2014. To achieve this objective, 42 banks’ panel data used in the study for the period of 2001-2014, structureconduct-performance, relative-market-power, efficient structure: X efficiency, efficiency structure: scale efficiency and quiet life hypotheses are tested by performing generalised least squares regression. Consequently, it is determined that structureconduct-performance, relative-market-power and efficiency structure: scale efficiency hypotheses are firmly held and quiet life hypothesis is strongly held in the industry

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, 2001-2014 dönemi itibariyle Türk Bankacılık endüstrisinde faaliyet gösteren bankalar için piyasa yapısı ve karlılık arasındaki ilişkiyi literatürde öne sürülen beş hipotez ile test etmektir. Bu amacı gerçekleştirmek üzere 20012014 döneminde 42 bankaya ait panel verilerin kullanıldığı çalışmada, yapı-davranış performans, göreli-piyasa-gücü, etkin yapı: x-etkinliği, etkin yapı: ölçek etkinliği ve rahat yaşam hipotezleri genelleştirilmiş en küçük kareler yöntemiyle test edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, endüstride yapı-davranışperformans, göreli-piyasa-gücü ve etkin yapı: ölçek etkinliği hipotezlerinin kısmen geçerli olduğu ve rahat yaşam hipotezinin ise güçlü bir biçimde geçerli olduğu tespit edilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALMAŞUR, G., DAŞTAN, H. (2016). Market Structure and Profitability Relationship in the Turkish Banking Industry. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 363–378. https://ajindex.com/articles/751978

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abreu, M. ve Mendes, V. (2001) “Commercial Bank Interest Margins and Profitability: Evidence from Some EU Countries” The Proceedings of the Pan- European Conference, The IEFS-UK&University of Macedonia Economic&Social Sciences, Thessaloniki, Greece, May 17–20,
  2. Thessaloniki. Afşar, M. (2011) “Küresel Kriz ve Türk Bankacılık Sektörüne Yansımaları” Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 6(2): 143‐171. Al-Jafari, M. K. ve Alchami, M. (2014) “Determinants of Bank Profitability: Evidence from Syria” Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 4(1): 17-45.
  3. Al-Muharrami, S. ve Matthews, K. (2009) “Market Power versus Efficient-Structure in Arab GCC Banking” Cardiff Economics Working Papers, No: 2009/7. Atemkeng, T. ve Nzongang, J. (2006) “Market Structure and Profitability Performance in the Banking Industry of CFA Countries: The Case of Commercial Banks in Cameroon” Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 8(2): 1-14.
  4. Athanasoglou, P. P., Delis, M. D. ve Staikouras, C. K. (2006) “Determinants of Bank Profitability in the South Eastern European Region” Bank of Greece Working Paper, 47. Athanasoglou, P. P., Brissimis, S. N. ve Delis, M. D. (2008) “Bank-Specific, Industry-Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Bank Profitability” International Financial Markets, Institutions&Money, 18: 121-136.
  5. Ayadi, I. ve Ellouze, A. (2013) “Market Structure and Performance of Tunisian Banks” International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(2): 345-354.
  6. Ayaydın, H. ve Karakaya, A. (2014) “The Effect of Bank Capital on Profitability and Risk in Turkish Banking” International Journal of Business and Social Science, (1): 252-271.
  7. Banker, R. D. (1992) “Estimation of Returns to Scale Using Data Envelopment Analysis” European Journal of Operational Research, 62(1): 74-84.
  8. Beck, T., Demirgüç Kunt, A. ve Levine, R. (2003) “Bank Concentration and Crises” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 9921. Behname, M. (2012) “The Compare of Concentration and Efficiency in Banking Industry: Evidence from the OPEC Countries” Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 5(10): 15-24.
  9. Bektas, E. (2006) “Test of Market Structure and Profitability in Liberalizing the Deposit Market: The Case of North Cyprus” Problems and Perspectives in Management, 4(2): 62-67.
  10. Berger, A. N. ve Hannan, T. H. (1989) “The Price Concentration Relationship in Banking” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(2): 291-299.
  11. Berger, A. N. (1995) “The Profit-Structure Relationship in Banking-Te