Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

Designing Public Policies to Support SME Innovation Capacity: Proposal of an Approach based on Innovativeness Profiles

KOBİ’lerin Yenilikçilik Kapasitelerini Geliştirecek Desteklerin Tasarımı: Yenilikçilik Profillerine Dayalı Bir Yaklaşım Önerisi

Pages
555–572
Publication Date
2016-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

That would increase the contribution of SMEs to the country’s overall technological development process and international competitiveness

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is crucial for enterprises to follow sustainable and competitive growth strategies to survive in the global market.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The approach would lead to different strategic roadmaps and public support tools designed for SMEs with different innovative profiles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:That would increase the contribution of SMEs to the country’s overall technological development process and international competitiveness
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:KOBİ · Yenilik · Kamu Destek Tasarımı

Abstract

It is crucial for enterprises to follow sustainable and competitive growth strategies to survive in the global market. Companies which cannot produce adequate levels of innovation outputs are likely to lose their competitiveness. Small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) which constitute a large part of enterprises face more diverse set of obstacles than larger enterprises. Thus, in many countries public policies that encourage innovation are encountered. In this study, an approach is proposed to design public policies based on innovation profiles of SMEs. The approach would lead to different strategic roadmaps and public support tools designed for SMEs with different innovative profiles. That would increase the contribution of SMEs to the country’s overall technological development process and international competitiveness

Özet

İşletmelerin, küresel pazarda hayatta kalabilmelerinin yolu, izledikleri büyüme stratejilerinin sürdürülebilir ve rekabetçi olmasından geçmektedir. Yeterli seviyede yenilikçilik çıktısı üretemeyen işletmeler rekabet güçlerini kaybetmektedir. İşletmelerin sayı olarak büyük kısmını oluşturan KOBİ’ler, yenilikçilik konusunda büyük işletmelere göre daha farklı engellerle karşı karşıyadırlar. Bu nedenle birçok ülkede KOBİ’lerde yeniliği teşvik eden kamu politikalarına rastlanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, kamu destek politikaları tasarımında KOBİ’lerin yenilikçilik profillerini” temel alan bir yaklaşım önerilmektedir. Bu yaklaşım kapsamında, farklı yenilikçilik profillerine sahip KOBİ’ler için farklı stratejik yol haritaları ve kamu destek araçları sunulmuştur. Bu sayede, gelişmekte olan ülke KOBİ’lerinin ülkenin teknolojik gelişme sürecine ve uluslararası rekabetçiliğine daha fazla katkı yapmasının mümkün olacağı düşünülmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

DAŞ, G. S., YÜLEK, M. (2016). Designing Public Policies to Support SME Innovation Capacity: Proposal of an Approach based on Innovativeness Profiles. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 555–572. https://ajindex.com/articles/751966

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abereijo I., Ilori M., Taiwo K., Adegbite S. (2007), “Assessment of the capabilities for innovation by small and medium industry in Nigeria”, African Journal of Business Management, 1 (8): 209-217.
  2. Adegbite S., Ilori M., Irefin I., Abereijo I., Aderemi H. (2007)., “Evaluation of the Impact of Entrepreneurial Characteristics on the Performance of Small Scale Manufacturing Industries in Nigeria”, Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, Aydemir R. (2000), Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmelerde Taşımacılığın Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimindeki Rolü ve Gebze Civarında bir Uygulama, Basılmamış yüksek lisans Tezi, GYTE sosyal bilimler enstitüsü. Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., Sambrook, S., & Davies, D. (2012). Food sector SMEs and innovation types. British Food Journal, 114 (11), 1640-1653.
  3. Bessant J., Tidd J.(2007).
  4. Innovation and entrepreneurship, Wiley. Birchall D., Chanaron, J., Soderquist K. (1996), “Managing Innovation in SMEs: A Comparison of Companies in the UK, France and Portugal”, International Journal of Technology Management, 12 (3): 291-305.
  5. Cansız M. (2008). Türkiye’de KOBİ’ler ve KOSGEB. DPT Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara 2008.
  6. Carrier, C. (1994), “Intrapreneurship in Large Firms and SMEs: A Comparative Study”, International Small Business Journal, 12 (3): 54-61.
  7. Clark J., Guy K. (2010), “Innovation and competitiveness: a review”, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10 (3): 363-395.
  8. Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO (2015): The Global Innovation Index 2015: Effective Innovation Policies for Development, Fontainebleau, Ithaca, and Geneva. Cosh A. Hughes A. (2000),” Innovation activity and performance in SMEs” Cosh, A.D. and Hughes, A. (eds.) British Enterprise in Transition: Growth Innovation and Public Policy in the small and medium sized enterprise sector 1994-1999,
  9. ESRC Centre for Business Research, Cambridge, Çalıpınar H., Baç U.(2007), “KOBİ’lerde inovasyon yapmayı etkileyen faktörler ve bir alan araştırması”, Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Yıl: 7, Sayı:2. Docter, H.J. Stokman, C.T.M. (1988), “Innovation in SMEs”. Paper for symposium on Technology– Economics, 31 March 1988,
  10. The Hague. Eker, S. (2011), “ KOBİ’lerde Teknolojik Ar-Ge çalışmalarının istihdam üzerine etkileri: Tekmer’lerde bir uygulama”, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi.
  11. El Kabbani R.N., Kalhoefer C. (2011), “Financing Resources for Egyptian Small and Medium Enterprises”, Working Paper No.28, German University in Cairo. European Commission, Annual Inn