Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

The Empirical Role of Real Crude Oil Price and Real Exchange Rate on Economic Growth: The Case of Turkey

Reel Petrol Fiyatları ve Reel Döviz Kurunun Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Rolü: Türkiye Örneği

Pages
627–639
Publication Date
2016-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is seen that there is a difference between models in terms of out-of sample forecasting performances

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Mostly national economies need petroleum which is the basic weighted input of the energy day by day.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the same time, fluctuations in the real exchange rate have an important effect on national economies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is seen that there is a difference between models in terms of out-of sample forecasting performances
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Reel Ham Petrol Fiyatları · eel Döviz Kuru · Ekonomik Büyüme

Abstract

Mostly national economies need petroleum which is the basic weighted input of the energy day by day. The general price level and production are influenced as a result of the fact that changes in petroleum prices have an impact on input prices. At the same time, fluctuations in the real exchange rate have an important effect on national economies. The aim of this study is to analyze the relationships between economic growth and real crude oil prices and economic growth and real exchange rate and to compare out-of sample forecasting performances of several models. In this context, we use the Gregory and Hansen cointegration method which allows a structural break in the relationship during the period between 1984:1 and 2010:4. Consequently, we find a negative relationship between the real crude oil price and economic growth also negative relationship between the real exchange rate and economic growth in Turkey. We use cointegration equations to establish error correction models, and we obtain forecasts to find which model can characterize of the data better. It is seen that there is a difference between models in terms of out-of sample forecasting performances

Özet

Ulusal ekonomiler gün geçtikçe enerjinin temel girdisi olan petrole ihtiyaç duymaktadırlar. Genel fiyat düzeyi ve üretim, girdi fiyatları üzerinde bir etkiye sahip olan petrol fiyatlarındaki değişimlerin bir sonucu olarak etkilenmektedir. Aynı zamanda, reel döviz kurunda meydana gelen dalgalanmalar ulusal ekonomiler üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahiptir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ekonomik büyüme ile reel ham petrol fiyatları ve ekonomik büyüme ile reel döviz kuru arasındaki ilişkiyi analiz etmek ve elde edilen modellerin örneklem dışı öngörümleme performansını karşılaştırmaktır. Bu kapsamda, 1984:1 – 2010:4 dönemleri arasında yapısal kırılmaya izin veren Gregory ve Hansen Eşbütünleşme testi kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, ekonomik büyüme ve reel ham petrol fiyatları, ekonomik büyüme ve reel döviz kuru arasında negatif yönlü bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Hata düzeltme modellerini elde etmede eşbütünleşik denklemler kullanılmış ve veri setini hangi modelin daha iyi karakterize ettiğini belirlemek için öngörüler elde edilmiştir. Örneklem dışı öngörümleme performansları açısından modeller arasında bir farkın olduğu görülmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLAY, E., PAZARLIOĞLU, M. V. (2016). The Empirical Role of Real Crude Oil Price and Real Exchange Rate on Economic Growth: The Case of Turkey. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 627–639. https://ajindex.com/articles/751951

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aliyu, S.U.R. (2009) “Impact of Oil Price Shock and Exchange Rate Volatility On Economic Growth in Nigeria: An Empirical Investigation”, Research Journal of International Studies, 11: 4-15.
  2. Aydın, L. and Acar, M. (2011) “Economic Impact of Oil Price Shocks on Turkish Economy in the coming decades: A Dynamic CGE Analysis”, Energy Policy, 39: 1731. Berument, H. and Dincer, N.N. (2004) “The effects of exchange rate risk on economic performance: The Turkish experience”, Applied Economics, 36: 2429 Berument, H. and Taşçı, H. (2002) “Inflationary effect of crude oil prices in Turkey”, Physica A, 316: 568-580.
  3. Cook, S. (2006) “Are stock prices and economic activity cointegrated?: Evidence from the United States, 1950 ”, Annals of Financial Economics, 2: 42-56.
  4. Çatık, A.N. and Önder, A.O. (2013) “An asymmetric analysis of the relationship between oil prices and output: The case of Turkey”, Economic Modelling, 33: 892. Dickey, D.A. and Fuller, W.A. (1979) “Distribution of the estimator for autoregressive time series with a unit root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association,: 427-431.
  5. Doğan, S., Ustaoğlu, M. and Demez, S. (2012) “Relationship between Real Oil Price and Real Exchange Rate: the case of Turkey”, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58: 1293-1300.
  6. Domaç, I. and Shabsigh, G. (1999) “Real Exchange Rate Behavior and Economic Growth: Evidence From Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia”, IMF Working Paper, WP/99/40. Edirnegil, A. and Mucuk, M. (2014) “The Effects of Oil Price on Turkish Economic Growth”, 12th International Academic Conference, Prague. Eichengreen, B. and Leblang, D. (2003) “Exchange Rates and Cohesion: Historical Perspectives and Political-Economy Considerations”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41: 797-822.
  7. Eryiğit, M. (2009) “Effects of Oil Price Changes On the Sector Indices of İstanbul Stock Exchange”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 25: 209-216.
  8. Eryiğit, M. (2012) “The Dynamic Relationship between Oil Price Shocks and Selected Macroeconomic Variables in Turkey”, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 25: 263-276.
  9. Ghosh, A.R., Gulde, A.M., Ostry, J.D. and Wolf, H.C. (1997) “Does The Nominal Exchange Rate Regime Matter?”, NBER Working Paper, No:5874. Ghosh, S. (2009) “Import Demand Of Crude Oil and Economic Growth: Evidence From India”, Energy Policy, 37: 699-702.
  10. Gregory, A.W. and Hansen, B.E. (1996) “Residual-based Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts”, Journal of Economics, 70: 9