Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış / 2011 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Fuzzy logic based econometric modelling: Money demand-evidence from Turkey

Bulanık mantık tabanlı ekonometrik modelleme: para talebi-Türkiye örneği

Pages
349–359
Publication Date
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, in this study, cointegration test which was proposed by Engle-Granger (1987) and fuzzy Takagi-Sugeno method are used to estimate Turkey’s money demand function and two methods are compared and consequently,the results are interpreted.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:At the present day, we investigate literature about Money demand, we can see that cointegration techniques are used in most of studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mostly, cointegration techniques are being used as estimating methods for any money demand function.Cointegration techniques which were proposed by Engle-Granger (1987) and Johansen-Juselius (1990) have been used for modelling countries’ money demand function by researchers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, in this study, cointegration test which was proposed by Engle-Granger (1987) and fuzzy Takagi-Sugeno method are used to estimate Turkey’s money demand function and two methods are compared and consequently,the results are interpreted.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

At the present day, we investigate literature about Money demand, we can see that cointegration techniques are used in most of studies. Money demand econometric modelling techniques are used by a great number of researchers. Mostly, cointegration techniques are being used as estimating methods for any money demand function.Cointegration techniques which were proposed by Engle-Granger (1987) and Johansen-Juselius (1990) have been used for modelling countries’ money demand function by researchers. In stage of application of monetary policy, when assessment of policy stance as well as monetary policy decisions depend on the relationship between money and the other macroeconomic variables, different methods which allows for different functional relations are being important. The purpose of this study is proposing an alternative method, instead of econometric modelling methods which have been used widely in literature. Thus, in this study, cointegration test which was proposed by Engle-Granger (1987) and fuzzy Takagi-Sugeno method are used to estimate Turkey’s money demand function and two methods are compared and consequently,the results are interpreted.

Özet

Günümüzde yapılan para talebinin modellenmesine ilişkin literatürü incelediğimizde, modelleme yöntemi olarak çoğunlukla kointegrasyon testlerinin kullanılmış olduğu ve bu testlerden Engle-Granger (1987) yanı sıra Johansen-Juselius (1990) tarafından önerilen kointegrasyon tekniklerinin birçok araştırmacı tarafından çoğu ülkenin para talebinin modellenmesinde uygulandığı görülmektedir. Para politikasının uygulanması aşamasında politik tutumların değerlendirilmesinin yanı sıra para politikası kapsamında alınacak kararlar, para ve diğer makroekonomik değişkenler arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesine bağlı olduğundan, farklı fonksiyonel ilişkileri değerlendirmemize izin veren farklı modelleme yöntemlerinin ele alınarak değerlendirilmesi önem kazanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, literatürde yaygın bir biçimde kullanılan ekonometrik modelleme yöntemine karşılık alternatif bir yöntem ortaya koymaktır. Bu nedenle, çalışmada kointegrasyon yöntemlerinden biri olan Engle-Granger (1987) tarafından önerilen eşbütünleşme testi ile bulanık modelleme yöntemlerinden bulanık Takagi-Sugeno modeli kullanılıp, iki yöntem Türkiye’nin para talebi fonksiyonunun incelenmesi aşamasında karşılaştırılarak yorumlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARAS, S., GÜLAY, E. (2022). Fuzzy logic based econometric modelling: Money demand-evidence from Turkey. Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 349–359. https://ajindex.com/articles/495508

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Achsani, N.A., Holtemöller, O. ve Sofyan, H. (2005) “Econometric and Fuzzy Modelling of Indonesian Money Demand” Cizek, P. Hardle, W. ve Weron, R. (eds) Statistical Tools in Finance and Insurance, Berlin, Germany, Springer. Akay, H.K. ve Nargeleçekenler, M. (2008) “Uzun Dönem Para Talebi ve Reel Hisse Senedi Fiyatları: Türkiye Örneği” Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 45(518):31-41.
  2. Akçağlayan, A. ve Dönmez, F. (2006) “How Stable is the Money Demand Function in Turkey ” Working Paper Series, 7(2):7-18.
  3. Altıntaş, H. (2008) “Türkiye’de Para Talebinin İstikrarı ve Sınır Testi Yaklaşımıyla Öngörülmesi: 1985–2006” Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 30: 15–46.
  4. Bezdek, J.C. ve Pal, S. K. (1992)
  5. Fuzzy Models for Pattern Recognition, New York, IEEE Press,
  6. Deckle, R ve Pradhan, M. (1999) “Financial Liberalization and Money Demand in the ASEAN Countries” International Journal of Finance and Economics, 4: 205–215.
  7. Draeseke R. ve Giles D. E. A. (2000) “A Fuzzy Logic Approach To Modelling The New Zealand Underground Economy” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 59(1- 3):115-123.
  8. Giles, D.E.A. ve Draeseke, R. (2001) “Econometric Modelling Using Pattern Recognition via the Fuzzy c-Means Algorithm” Giles, D.E.A. (eds.) Computer-Aided Econometrics, New York, Marcel Dekker. Josef A. M. (1992) “Neural Market Structure Analysis: Novel Topology-Sensitive Methodology” European Journal of Marketing, 35(7/8):894-914.
  9. Koğar, C. İ. (1995) “Cointegration Test for Money Demand: The Case for Turkey and Israel” Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Research Department, Discussion Paper No.9514. Lindström T. (1998) “A Fuzzy Design of The Willingness to Invest in Sweden” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 36:1–17.
  10. Mucha, H.J. and Sofyan, H. (2000) “Cluster Analysis” Hardle, W., Klinke, S. ve Hlavka, Z. (eds.) XploRe Application Guide, Heidelberg, Springer. Oskooee, M.B. ve Chomsisengphet, S. (2002) “Stability Of M2 Money Demand Function in Industrial Countries” Applied Economics, 34: 2075–2083.
  11. Oskooee, M.B. ve Shin, S. (2002) “Stability of Demand for Money in Korea” International Economic Journal, 16(2):85– 95. Özdemir, K.A. ve Turner, P. (2004) “The Demand zor Base Money in Turkey: Implications for Inflation and Seigniorage” CBRT Research Department Working Paper No. 04/12. Price, S. ve Insukindro (1994) “The Demand for Indonesian Narrow Money: Long-run Equilibrium, Error Correction and Forward-looking Behaviour” The Journal of Internati