Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

The ‘Norway Model’ for a Privileged Partnership Between the EU and Turkey

Pages
213–226
Publication Date
2021-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper analyses the Norway model for an alternative path to the Turkish-EU relations comparing the model with the status quo as well as with the proposed scenarios for the updated Customs Union by the European Commission.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Even though no one has officially declared the halt of Turkey’s EU accession process, Ankara’s membership negotiations have effectively been stalled over the past few years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Neither Brussels nor Ankara wants a complete collapse of bilateral ties which are strong, multifaceted and complex as well as beneficial for both Turkey and the EU.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper analyses the Norway model for an alternative path to the Turkish-EU relations comparing the model with the status quo as well as with the proposed scenarios for the updated Customs Union by the European Commission.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Norway model · European Economic Area · Customs Union

Abstract

Even though no one has officially declared the halt of Turkey’s EU accession process, Ankara’s membership negotiations have effectively been stalled over the past few years. Neither Brussels nor Ankara wants a complete collapse of bilateral ties which are strong, multifaceted and complex as well as beneficial for both Turkey and the EU. In fact, as suggested by some observers, Turkey and the EU are not stuck with full membership as the only option going forward. The two sides can modify the relationship toward building a privileged partnership based upon one of the external differentiated integration models. The “Norway model” of integration with the EU might be a feasible option for Turkey and the EU considering the fact that the two sides have already come to an agreement to upgrade their Customs Union. This paper analyses the Norway model for an alternative path to the Turkish-EU relations comparing the model with the status quo as well as with the proposed scenarios for the updated Customs Union by the European Commission.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALTAY, S. (2021). The ‘Norway Model’ for a Privileged Partnership Between the EU and Turkey. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 213–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/751846

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Altay, S. (2018a). Associating Turkey with the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: a Costly (Re-)engagement?, World Economy, Vol. 41 (2018). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12533
  2. Altay, S. (2018b). Toward a “Privileged Partnership: The EU, Turkey and the Upgrade of the Customs Union, Insight Turkey, Summer 2018/Vol. 20, NO 3, pp. 179-198. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.25253/99.2018203.13
  3. Altomonte, C., Defraigne, P., Delattre, L., Goulard, S., Guttenberg, K. T. F., & Scharping, R. (2006). Le Partenariat privilégié, alternative à l’adhésion. Brochure, No. 38. Fondation Robert Schuman BBC News. (2016).
  4. Five models for post-Brexit UK trade, June 27. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics- eu-referendum-36639261 Beyazıt, Ö. (2014). Privileged Partnership: As An Alternative Way to Turkey’s European Union Membership Bid. Law & Justice Review, 9, 277–339.
  5. Bobowiec, Z. (2017). Brexit and Free Movement of People: The Frameworks and Legal Bases of Possible Migration Control. King’s Journal for Politics, Philosophy and Law, 1, 105–116. Retrieved from https://blogs.kcl.ac.uk/ksjppl/wp-content/ blogs.dir/187/files/2017/03/Brexit-and-Free-Movementof- People-The-Frameworks-and-Legal-Bases-of-Possible- Migration-Control.pdf Del Picchia, R. and Haenel, H. (2004). “Rapport d’Information fait au Nom de la Délégation pour l’Union Européenne (1) sur la Candidature de la Turquie à l’Union Européenne,”. Annex to Senate Hearing, No. 279, (April 29, 2004). Retrieved from (http://www.senat.fr/rap/r03-279/r03-2791.pdf
  6. EEA Review Committee. (2012). Outside and Inside: Norway’s agreements with the European Union (2012:2). Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/ ud/vedlegg/eu/nou2012_2_chapter27.pdf EFTA Court. (2021). EFTA Court Home. Retrieved from http:// www.eftacourt.int/ EFTA Surveillance Authority. (2021). EEA rights and obligations. Retrieved from http://www.eftasurv.int/
  7. Emerson, M. (2017). “Which Model for Brexit?” in: da Costa Cabral N., Renato Gonçalves J. & Cunha Rodrigues N. (eds) After Brexit. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 2017, pp. 1-17. European Commission (EC). (2015). EU and Turkey announce modernisation of Custom Union. Retrieved from http:// trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1307 European Commission (EC). (2016a). Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment. Retrieved from http://ec.europa. eu/smart-regulation/impact/ia_carried_out/docs/ ia_2016/swd_2016_0475_en.pdf European Commission (