SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Economics Business and Organization Research / 2020 / Proceedings of The Third Economics, Business And Organization Research (EBOR) Conference

DOES BANK PROFITABILITY PROMOTE ECONOMIC GROWTH AND VICE VERSA? PANEL CAUSALITY EVIDENCE FROM THE SELECTED COUNTRIES

Fatih CEYLAN
Işıl EREM CEYLAN
Pages
105–115
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To the best of our knowledge, this study provides an in-depth insight into by considering several countries and using panel causality test to study the relationship between bank profitability and economic growth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Banks, which have an important role in the country economies, increase the amount of savings and capital accumulation by bringing together those who supply and demand funds in the economy, and this increase contributes positively to economic growth and employment through the resource transfer function of banks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Panel causality test is applied to examine the so-called causality relationship by considering the period of 2009-2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To the best of our knowledge, this study provides an in-depth insight into by considering several countries and using panel causality test to study the relationship between bank profitability and economic growth.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Bank Profitability · Economic Growth · Panel Causality

Abstract

Banks, which have an important role in the country economies, increase the amount of savings and capital accumulation by bringing together those who supply and demand funds in the economy, and this increase contributes positively to economic growth and employment through the resource transfer function of banks. The ability of banks to function properly depends largely on their profitability levels, and banks with desired profitability levels are expected to have a positive effect on economic growth. Therefore, it is important to conduct more empirical studies in terms of determining the profitability of banks and the relationship between this profitability level and economic growth, which are of vital importance in national economies. At this point, the purpose of this study is to determine the causal relationship between bank profitability and economic growth across eight selected countries, including Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Croatia, India, Poland, Russia, and Turkey. Panel causality test is applied to examine the so-called causality relationship by considering the period of 2009-2018. The empirical findings have shown that bank profitability in the selected developing countries (Chile, Poland, Turkey and Russia) promotes the economic growth. To the best of our knowledge, this study provides an in-depth insight into by considering several countries and using panel causality test to study the relationship between bank profitability and economic growth.

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYLAN, F., CEYLAN, I. E. (2020). DOES BANK PROFITABILITY PROMOTE ECONOMIC GROWTH AND VICE VERSA? PANEL CAUSALITY EVIDENCE FROM THE SELECTED COUNTRIES. Economics Business and Organization Research, Proceedings of The Third Economics, Business And Organization Research (EBOR) Conference, 105–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/751754

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alev, N. (2018). ‘Profitability of the activity bank found in Turkey banking system and economic growth’, ASSAM International Refereed Journal, 5 (12), pp. 32-43.
  2. Breush, T. & Pagan, A., (1980). ‘The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics’. Rev. Econ. Stud. 47, pp. 239–253.
  3. Demirguc-Kunt, A. & Huizinga, H. (1999). ‘Determinants of commercial bank interest margins and profitability: some international evidence’, The World Bank Economic Review, 13(2), pp. 379-408.
  4. Dumitrescu, E.-I. & Hurlin, C., (2012). ‘Testing for granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels’, Economic Modelling, 29, pp. 1450–1460.
  5. Emirmahmutoglu, F. & Kose, N., (2011). ‘Testing for granger causality in heterogeneous mixed panels’, Economic Modelling, 28, pp. 870-876.
  6. Granger, C.W.J., (1969). ‘Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross spectral methods’, Econometrica, 37 (3), pp. 424-438.
  7. Hadri, K. & Kurozumi, E. (2012). ‘A simple panel stationary test in the presence of serial correlation and a common factor’, Economics Letters, 115, pp. 31-34.
  8. Isik, S. & Kambay, M. (2019). ‘Bank-specific and macro-economic determinants of profitability of Turkish commercial banks’, The Banks Association of Turkey, Bankers Journal, 110, pp. 3-24.
  9. Javid, M. E. (2016). ‘Bank specific and macroeconomic determinants of bank profitability’, Journal of Management Info, 3 (2), pp. 14-18.
  10. Klein, P-O. & Weill, L. (2019). ‘Bank profitability and economic growth’, BOFIT Discussion Papers, 15, pp. 1-41.
  11. Moussa, M. A. B. & Hdidar, Z. (2019). ‘Bank profitability and economic growth: evidence from Tunisia’, European Journal of Economic and Financial Research, 3 (4), pp. 81-96.
  12. Obamuyi, T. M. (2013). ‘Determinants of banks’ profitability in a developing economy: evidence from Nigeria’, Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 4 (2), pp. 97-111.
  13. Ozturk, H. (2016). ‘A n empirical analysis of macroeconomic factors affecting Turkish banking sector’, Finance Politic and Economic Comments Journal, 53 (620), pp. 11-29.
  14. Parasiz, I. (2000). Money, banking and financial markets. 7th edition, Bursa: Ezgi Publishing. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). ‘General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels”, Center For Economic Studies’, Institute for Economic Research, Working Paper No: 1229. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). ‘A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), pp. 265-312.
  15. Pesaran, M. H. & Y