Journals / Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A1 Mathematics and Statistics / 2022 / Cilt: 71 - Sayı: 2

Weak subgradient method with path based target level algorithm for nonconvex optimization

Pages
377–394
Publication Date
2022-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, we demonstrate the performance of the proposed method on nonsmooth, nonconvex test problems, and give the computational results by comparing them with the approximately optimal solutions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We study a new version of the weak subgradient method, recently developed by Dinc Yalcin and Kasimbeyli for solving nonsmooth, nonconvex problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This method is based on the concept of using any weak subgradient of the objective of the problem at the currently generated point with a version of the dynamic stepsize in order to produce a new point at each iteration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, we demonstrate the performance of the proposed method on nonsmooth, nonconvex test problems, and give the computational results by comparing them with the approximately optimal solutions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Weak subgradient · nonconvex optimization · nonsmooth optimization

Abstract

We study a new version of the weak subgradient method, recently developed by Dinc Yalcin and Kasimbeyli for solving nonsmooth, nonconvex problems. This method is based on the concept of using any weak subgradient of the objective of the problem at the currently generated point with a version of the dynamic stepsize in order to produce a new point at each iteration. The target value needed in the dynamic stepsize is defined using a path based target level (PBTL) algorithm to ensure the optimal value of the problem is reached. We analyze the convergence and give an estimate of the convergence rate of the proposed method. Furthermore, we demonstrate the performance of the proposed method on nonsmooth, nonconvex test problems, and give the computational results by comparing them with the approximately optimal solutions.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇIN, G. D. (2022). Weak subgradient method with path based target level algorithm for nonconvex optimization. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A1 Mathematics and Statistics, Cilt: 71 - Sayı: 2, 377–394. https://ajindex.com/articles/746647

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akbari, Z., Yousefpour, R., Peyghami, M. R., A new nonsmooth trust region algorithm for locally Lipschitz unconstrained optimization problems, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 164 (3) (2015), 733–754, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10957-014-0534-6
  2. Allen, E., Helgason, R., Kennington, J., Shetty, B., A generalization of Polyak’s convergence result for subgradient optimization, Mathematical Programming, 37 (3) (1987), 309–317.
  3. Azimov, A., Gasimov, R., On weak conjugacy, weak subdifferentials and duality with zero gap in nonconvex optimization, International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 1 (2) (1999), 171–192.
  4. Azimov, A., Gasimov, R., Stability and duality of nonconvex problems via augmented Lagrangian, Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 38 (3) (2002), 412–421, https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020316811823
  5. Bagirov, A., A method for minimization of quasidifferentiable functions, Optimization Methods and Software, 17 (1) (2002), 31–60, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10556780290027837
  6. Bagirov, A. M., A method for minimizing convex functions based on continuous approximations to the subdifferential, Optimization Methods and Software, 9 (1998), 1–17, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10556789808805683
  7. Bagirov, A. M., Ugon, J., Codifferential method for minimizing nonsmooth DC functions, Journal of Global Optimization, 50 (1) (2011), 3–22, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10898-010-9569-x
  8. Beck, A., Teboulle, M., Smoothing and first order methods: A unified framework, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 22 (2) (2012), 557–580, https://dx.doi.org/10.1137/100818327
  9. Bolte, J., Sabach, S., Teboulle, M., Proximal alternating linearized minimization for nonconvex and nonsmooth problems, Mathematical Programming, 146 (1-2) (2014), 459–494, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10107-013-0701-9
  10. Borges, P., Sagastiz´abal, C., Solodov, M., A regularized smoothing method for fully parameterized convex problems with applications to convex and nonconvex two-stage stochastic programming, Mathematical Programming (2020), 1–33, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10107-020-01582-2 Bot¸, R. I., Csetnek, E. R., An inertial Tsengs type proximal algorithm for nonsmooth and nonconvex optimization problems, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 171 (2) (2016), 600–616, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10957-015-0730-z
  11. Bot, R. I., Csetnek, E. R., Nguyen, D. K., A proximal minimization algorithm for structured nonconvex and nonsmooth problems, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 29 (2) (2019), 1300–1328, https://dx.d