SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A1 Mathematics and Statistics / 2026 / Volume: 75 Issue: 3

Statistical Inference for Multi-sample of Geometric Processes with Lognormal Distribution

Ömer Altındağ(BİLECİK ŞEYH EDEBALİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7035-9612
Halil Aydoğdu(ANKARA UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-5337-5277
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-26
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the proposed inferential procedures are illustrated using a real dataset comprising failure data from two machining centers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The geometric process is an important counting process model that serves as an alternative to non-homogeneous Poisson process models.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Accurate statistical inference for a geometric process is essential for appropriate data modeling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the proposed inferential procedures are illustrated using a real dataset comprising failure data from two machining centers.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Geometric process · lognormal distribution · multi-sample

Abstract

The geometric process is an important counting process model that serves as an alternative to non-homogeneous Poisson process models. It is widely used in reliability analysis, particularly in the modeling of repairable systems, due to its monotonic behaviour. Accurate statistical inference for a geometric process is essential for appropriate data modeling. While extensive research has addressed inference in the single-sample case, real-world data are often collected from multiple sources, leading to multi-sample datasets. This introduces new challenges for statistical inference. In this study, we investigate the inference problem for a geometric process based on multi-sample data, under the assumption that the inter-arrival times of each process follow a lognormal distribution and that the samples are homogeneous. Maximum likelihood estimators of the model parameters are obtained, and their asymptotic characteristics are established. The Expectation-Maximization algorithm is adopted to compute the maximum likelihood estimators in case of censored observations. Additionally, we propose test statistics for assessing the homogeneity of the samples and for detecting the presence of a trend in the data. A simulation analysis is undertaken to evaluate and compare the maximum likelihood estimators against their non-parametric counterparts. Finally, the proposed inferential procedures are illustrated using a real dataset comprising failure data from two machining centers.

🔖

Cite This Article

Altındağ, Ö., Aydoğdu, H. (2026). Statistical Inference for Multi-sample of Geometric Processes with Lognormal Distribution. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A1 Mathematics and Statistics, Volume: 75 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.31801/cfsuasmas.1765197

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (55)

  1. Ali, S. (2021). First passage time control charts assuming power law intensity for time to jointly monitor time and magnitude. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 37(5):2034–2064.
  2. Altındağ, Ö. (2025a). Non-parametric inference for multi-sample of geometric processes with application to multi-system repair process modeling. Mathematics, 13(14):2260.
  3. Altındağ, Ö. (2025b). Statistical evaluation of multiple process data in geometric processes with exponential failures. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 54(2):738–761.
  4. Altındağ, Ö. and Aydoğdu, H. (2021). Estimation of renewal function under progressively censored data and its applications. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 216:107988.
  5. Arnold, R., Chukova, S., Hayakawa, Y., and Marshall, S. (2019). Warranty cost analysis with an alternating geometric process. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 233(4):698–715.
  6. Ascher, H. and Feingold, H. (1984). Repairable Systems Reliability: Modeling, Inference, Misconceptions and Their Causes. Wiley.
  7. Aydoğdu, H. and Altındağ, Ö. (2016). Computation of the mean value and variance functions in geometric process. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 86(5):986–995.
  8. Aydoğdu, H., Şenoğlu, B., and Kara, M. (2010). Parameter estimation in geometric process with Weibull distribution. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 217(6):2657–2665.
  9. Barlow, R. E. and Proschan, F. (1996). Mathematical Theory of Reliability, volume 17 of Classics in Applied Mathematics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
  10. Biçer, C., Bakouch, H. S., and Biçer, H. D. (2021). Inference on parameters of a geometric process with scaled Muth distribution. Fluctuation and Noise Letters, 20(1):2150006.
  11. Blischke, W. R. and Murthy, D. N. P. (2011). Reliability: Modeling, Prediction, and Optimization. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  12. Chan, J. S. K., Lam, C. P., Yu, P. L. H., Choy, S. T. B., and Chen, C. W. S. (2012). A Bayesian conditional autoregressive geometric process model for range data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 56(11):3006–3019.
  13. Chan, J. S. K., Lam, Y., and Leung, D. Y. (2004). Statistical inference for geometric processes with gamma distributions. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 47(3):565–581.
  14. Chan, J. S. K., Wan, W. Y., and Yu, P. L. H. (2014). Poisson geometric process approach for predicting drop-out and committed first-time blood donors. Journal of Applied Statistics, 41(7):1486–1503.
  15. Chan, J. S. K., Yu, P. L. H., Lam, Y., and Ho, A. P. K. (2006). Modelling SARS data using threshold geometric process. Statistics in Medicine, 25(11):1826–1839.
  16. Chukova, S. and Hayakawa, Y. (2005). Warranty cost analysis: Quasi-renewal inter-repair times. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(7):687–698.
  17. Cohen, A. C. (1991). Truncated and Censored Samples: Theory and Applications. Marcel Dekker, New York.
  18. Cox, D. R. and Lewis, P. A. W. (1966). The Statistical Analysis of Series of Events. Methuen, London.
  19. da Costa Bueno, V. and Balakrishnan, N. (2022). A cumulative residual inaccuracy measure for coherent systems at component level and under nonhomogeneous Poisson processes. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 36(2):294–319.
  20. Demirci Biçer, H., Biçer, C., and Bakouch, H. S. (2022). A geometric process with Hjorth marginal: Estimation, discrimination, and reliability data modeling. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 38(5):2795–2819.
  21. Fleming, T. R. and Harrington, D. P. (2013). Counting Processes and Survival Analysis. John Wiley and Sons.
  22. Garmabaki, A. H. S., Ahmadi, A., Block, J., Pham, H., and Kumar, U. (2016a). A reliability decision framework for multiple repairable units. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 150:78–88.
  23. Garmabaki, A. H. S., Ahmadi, A., Mahmood, Y. A., and Barabadi, A. (2016b). Reliability modelling of multiple repairable units. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 32(7):2329–2343.
  24. Jiang, R. (2022). Two approximations of renewal function for any arbitrary lifetime distribution. Annals of Operations Research, 311(1):151–165.
  25. Kara, M., Altındağ, Ö., Pekalp, M. H., and Aydoğdu, H. (2019). Parameter estimation in $\alpha$-series process with lognormal distribution. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 48(20):4976–4998.
  26. Kara, M., Güven, G., Şenoğlu, B., and Aydoğdu, H. (2022). Estimation of the parameters of the gamma geometric process. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 92(12):2525–2535.
  27. Kvaløy, J. T. and Lindqvist, B. H. (1998). TTT-based tests for trend in repairable systems data. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 60(1):13–28.
  28. Lam, Y. (1988a). Geometric processes and replacement problem. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, 4(4):366–377.
  29. Lam, Y. (1988b). A note on the optimal replacement problem. Advances in Applied Probability, 20(2):479–482.
  30. Lam, Y. (1991). An optimal repairable replacement model for deteriorating systems. Journal of Applied Probability, 28(4):843–851.
  31. Lam, Y. (1992). Nonparametric inference for geometric processes. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 21(7):2083–2105.
  32. Lam, Y. (2007a). The Geometric Process and Its Applications. World Scientific.
  33. Lam, Y. (2007b). A geometric process maintenance model with preventive repair. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(2):806–819.
  34. Lam, Y. and Chan, J. S. K. (1998). Statistical inference for geometric processes with lognormal distribution. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 27(1):99–112.
  35. Lam, Y. and Zhang, Y. L. (1996). Analysis of a two-component series system with a geometric process model. Naval Research Logistics, 43(4):491–502.
  36. Lam, Y. and Zhang, Y. L. (2003). A geometric-process maintenance model for a deteriorating system under a random environment. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 52(1):83–89.
  37. Lone, S. A., Alam, I., and Rahman, A. (2023). Statistical analysis under geometric process in accelerated life testing plans for generalized exponential distribution. Annals of Data Science, 10(6):1653–1665.
  38. McLachlan, G. J. and Krishnan, T. (2008). The EM Algorithm and Extensions. John Wiley & Sons.
  39. Na, I. Y. and Chang, W. (2017). Multi-system reliability trend analysis model using incomplete data with application to tank maintenance. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 33(8):2385–2395.
  40. Nelson, W. B. (2005). Applied Life Data Analysis. John Wiley and Sons.
  41. Ng, H. K. T., Chan, P. S., and Balakrishnan, N. (2002). Estimation of parameters from progressively censored data using EM algorithm. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 39(4):371–386.
  42. Pekalp, M. H., Altındağ, Ö., Acar, Ö., and Aydoğdu, H. (2020a). Plug-in estimators for the mean value and variance functions in delayed renewal processes. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 49(19):4693–4711.
  43. Pekalp, M. H. and Aydoğdu, H. (2018). An integral equation for the second moment function of a geometric process and its numerical solution. Naval Research Logistics, 65(2):176–184.
  44. Pekalp, M. H. and Aydoğdu, H. (2021). Power series expansions for the probability distribution, mean value and variance functions of a geometric process with gamma interarrival times. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 388:113287.
  45. Pekalp, M. H. and Aydoğdu, H. (2024). Parametric estimations of the mean value and variance functions in geometric process. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 449:115969.
  46. Pekalp, M. H., Aydoğdu, H., and Türkman, K. F. (2020b). Discriminating between some lifetime distributions in geometric counting processes. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, 51(3):715–737.
  47. Rasay, H., Azizi, F., and Naderkhani, F. (2024). A mathematical maintenance model for a production system subject to de-terioration according to a stochastic geometric process. Annals of Operations Research, 340:1–28.
  48. Tang, Y. Y. and Lam, Y. (2006). A $\delta$-shock maintenance model for a deteriorating system. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(2):541–556.
  49. Usta, I. (2024). Bayesian estimation for geometric process with the Weibull distribution. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, 53(5):2527–2553.
  50. Wan, W. Y. and Chan, J. S. K. (2009). A new approach for handling longitudinal count data with zero-inflation and overdispersion: Poisson geometric process model. Biometrical Journal: Journal of Mathematical Methods in Biosciences, 51(4):556–570.
  51. Wang, Y., Lu, Z., and Xiao, S. (2018). Parametric bootstrap confidence interval method for the power law process with applications to multiple repairable systems. IEEE Access, 6:49157–49169.
  52. Wei, G., Qiu, F., and Liu, X. (2024). Convolutional non-homogeneous poisson process and its application to wildfire ignition risk quantification for power delivery networks. Technometrics, 67(1):11–22.
  53. Yang, Z., Chen, C. H., Chen, F., Hao, Q. B., and Xu, B. B. (2013). Reliability analysis of machining center based on the field data. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność, 15(2):147–155.
  54. Yılmaz, A. (2024). Bayesian parameter estimation for geometric process with rayleigh distribution. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(2):482–491.
  55. Zhang, Y. L. and Wang, G. J. (2019). A geometric process warranty model using a combination policy. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 48(6):1493–1505.