SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Contrast Analysis on Single Factorial Studies and Solution with SPSS

Demet ÇANGA
Aysel YENİPINAR
Ömer Faruk KARAOKUR
Ayşe Betül ÖNEM
Ercan EFE
Pages
1–6
Publication Date
2019-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, contrast analysis results showed that a great part of the difference between the methods is due to the difference between method 3 and the others (p <0.01) according to F test detailed with 1 degree of freedom.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Contrast analysis is a method for comparing sets of means using specific coefficients for weighting the means.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The steps of the contrast analysis are explained using the SPSS.18 package program.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, contrast analysis results showed that a great part of the difference between the methods is due to the difference between method 3 and the others (p <0.01) according to F test detailed with 1 degree of freedom.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ANOVA · Contrast · Mean comparison

Abstract

Contrast analysis is a method for comparing sets of means using specific coefficients for weighting the means. In this study, contrast analysis as a planned comparison method and its use in one-factor trial designs are examined. For this purpose, a hypothetical data set is used to analyze the data related to the amount of dry matter determined by three different methods. The steps of the contrast analysis are explained using the SPSS.18 package program. In conclusion, contrast analysis results showed that a great part of the difference between the methods is due to the difference between method 3 and the others (p <0.01) according to F test detailed with 1 degree of freedom.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇANGA, D., YENİPINAR, A., KARAOKUR, Ö. F., ÖNEM, A. B., EFE, E. (2019). Contrast Analysis on Single Factorial Studies and Solution with SPSS. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/745130

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Abdi H, Edelman B, Valentin D, Dowling WJ. 2009. Experimental design and analysis for psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
  2. New York, USA. Bek Y, Efe E. 1988. Araştırma ve deneme metodları I. Ç.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Kitabı no:71, Ç.Ü Ziraat Fakültesi Ofset ve Teksir Atölyesi, Adana, 395 s. Benton R. 1989. Planned comparisons as better alternatives to ANOVA omnibus test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Little Rock, AR. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 312 296). Canga D, Efe C. 2017. Using contrasts in One-Way analysis of variance with control groups and an application. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A: David Publishing: 474-478. USA.doi: 10.17265/2161-6256/2017.07.003. Canga D. 2018. Ortalamaların karşılaştırılmasında kontrast kullanımı. Doktora tezi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü., 121s. Darlington R B, Hayes A F. 2016. Regression analysis and linear models: concepts, applications, and implementation. New York: Guilford Publications. DuRapau T M. 1988. Benefits of using planned comparisons rather than post hoc tests: a brief review with examples. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Louisville, KY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 203 490). Efe E, Bek Y, Sahin M. 2000. SPSS’te çözümleri ile istatistik yöntemler II. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü Yayın No: 73, Ders Kitapları, Yayın No:9, KSU. Basımevi, Kahramanmaraş, 223s. Field AP. 2016. Contrast and post hoc tests for one-way independent ANOVA using SPSS. https://www.discoveringstatistics.com/repository/contrasts.pdf.(access date: 08.01.2018).
  3. Genç S, Soysal MI. 2018. Parametric and nonparametric post hoc tests. BSJ Eng Sci, 1(1): 18-27. Gonzalez R. 2016. Contrasts and post hoc tests. http://www.personal.umich.edu/~gonzo/coursenotes/file3.pdf (Access date:08.01.2018). Karpinski A. 2006. Chapter 5 Contrasts for one-way ANOVA. https://marekrychlik.com/sites/default/files/05_contrasts1.pdf (access date:08.1.2018). Kuehne CC. 1993. The advantages of using planned comparisons over post hoc tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 364 597). Kwon M. 1996. The Use of planned comparisons in analysis of variance research. Paper Presented at Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Associ