SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STUDIES IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR

ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞTA ÇATIŞMA YÖNETİMİ ÇALIŞMALARININ GELİŞİM SÜRECİ

Ozan Nadir Alakavuklar
Ulaş Çakar
Yasemin Arbak
Pages
1–30
Publication Date
2012-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The analysis begins with drawing the structure of conflict studies and the study further follows a historical perspective beginning from the 1950s coming to contemporary views

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Conflict as a part of daily life is also of concern for the organizations that seek harmony and effectiveness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Conflict management is analyzed in the frame of various approaches and a comprehensive perspective is presented in order to demonstrate the current understanding of conflict management.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The analysis begins with drawing the structure of conflict studies and the study further follows a historical perspective beginning from the 1950s coming to contemporary views
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Örgütsel Davranış · Çatışma Yönetimi · Çatışma Yönetimi Modeller

Abstract

Conflict as a part of daily life is also of concern for the organizations that seek harmony and effectiveness. Therefore, it is essential to know and understand the characteristics, definitions and contributions of conflict management in organizations. This study aims to discuss how conflict as a concept developed in the scope of organizational behavior. Conflict management is analyzed in the frame of various approaches and a comprehensive perspective is presented in order to demonstrate the current understanding of conflict management. The analysis begins with drawing the structure of conflict studies and the study further follows a historical perspective beginning from the 1950s coming to contemporary views

Özet

Günlük yaşamın bir parçası olan çatışma, uyum ve etkililik arayışında olan örgütler için de göz önüne alınması gereken bir süreçtir. Bu nedenle, örgütlerde, çatışma yönetiminin özelliklerini, tanımlarını ve katkılarını bilmek ve anlamak büyük öneme sahiptir. Bu çalışma örgütsel davranış kapsamında bir kavram olarak çatışmanın ne şekilde geliştiğini tartışmayı amaçlamaktadır. Çatışma yönetimi farklı yaklaşımlar çerçevesinde analiz edilmekte ve çatışma yönetiminin güncel anlayışını göstermek için kapsamlı bir bakış açısı sunulmaktadır. Analiz çatışma çalışmalarının yapısını ortaya koyarak başlamakta ve çalışma 1950’lerden çağdaş görüşlere tarihsel bir bakış açısını izlemektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

Alakavuklar, O. N., Çakar, U., Arbak, Y. (2012). DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STUDIES IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 1–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/74468

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alakavuklar, O. N. (2007). Interpersonal conflict handling styles: The role of ethical approaches. Unpublished MBA thesis. İzmir:
  2. Dokuz Eylül University. Amason, A. C. & Sapienze, H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23 (4), 495-516.
  3. Amason, A. C. & Schweiger, D. M. (1997). The effects of conflict on strategic decision making effectiveness and organizational performance. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.) Using Conflict in Organizations, (pp. 23-37). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Barki, H. & Hartwick, J. (2001). Interpersonal conflict and its management in information system development. MIS Quarterly, 25 (2), 195-228.
  4. Barki, H. & Hartwick, J. (2004). Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal Management, 15 (3), 216-244. International Journal of Conflict Baron, R. A. (1989). Personality and organizational conflict: Type A behavior pattern and self monitoring. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44 (2), 281-297.
  5. Baron, R. A. (1990).
  6. Conflict in organizations. In Murphy, K. R. & Saal, F. E. (Eds.) Psychology in Organizations: Integrating Science and Practice, (pp. 197-216).
  7. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Bell, C. & Song, F. (2005). Emotions in the conflict process: An application of the cognitive appraisal model of emotions to conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16 (1), 30-54.
  8. Bodtker, A. M. & Jameson, J. K. (2001). Emotion in conflict formation and its transformation: Application to organizational conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12 (3), 259-275.
  9. Boulding, K. E. (1957). Organization and conflict. Conflict Resolution, 1 (2), 122-134.
  10. Conflict. (2012). Merriam-Webster. Encylopedia Britannica Company. Retrieved 20 May, 2012 from http://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/conflict Coser, L. A. (1961). The termination of conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 5 (4), 347-353.
  11. Dahrendorf, R. (1958). Toward a theory of social conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2 (2), 170-183.
  12. De Dreu, C. K. W. & Van de Vliert E. (1997). Using Conflict in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage. De Dreu, C. K. W. & Weingart, L. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (4), 741-749.
  13. De Dreu, C. K. W., Harinck, F. & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (1999). Conflict and performance in groups and organization