SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bitlis Eren University Journal of Science and Technology / 2017 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Identifying of structural elements of building using Ground penetrating radar (GPR): A case study of the Cumhuriyet University, Turkey

Erkan TAŞTAN
Sinan KOŞAROĞLU
Funda BİLİM
Pages
22–26
Publication Date
2017-06-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is proposed that the main reason of the structural changes in the reinforcements may be caused by groundwater.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is one of the most recommended non-destructive methods in identifying of structural elements of building.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The B building of the Cumhuriyet University, Engineering Faculty was assessed by using the 1600 MHz antennas.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is proposed that the main reason of the structural changes in the reinforcements may be caused by groundwater.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) · the reinforcement · the Curtain wall

Abstract

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is one of the most recommended non-destructive methods in identifying of structural elements of building. The B building of the Cumhuriyet University, Engineering Faculty was assessed by using the 1600 MHz antennas. As a result of evaluate of GPR data, the locations, horizontal and vertical interval, radius and corrosion rate of reinforcements in curtain walls is determined. It is proposed that the main reason of the structural changes in the reinforcements may be caused by groundwater.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞTAN, E., KOŞAROĞLU, S., BİLİM, F. (2017). Identifying of structural elements of building using Ground penetrating radar (GPR): A case study of the Cumhuriyet University, Turkey. Bitlis Eren University Journal of Science and Technology, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 22–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/743804

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Beben, D., Anigacz, W., and Ukleja, J. 2013. Diagnosis of bedrock course and retaining wall using GPR. NDT and E International, 59, 77-85.
  2. Chang, C.W., Lin, C.H., and Lien, H.S. 2009. Measurement radius of reinforcing steel bar in concrete using digital image GPR. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 1057-1063. Dérobert, X., Iaquinta, J., Klysz, G., and Balayssac, J. P. 2008. Use of capacitive and GPR techniques for the non-destructive evaluation of cover concrete. NDT and E International, 41, 44-52.
  3. Hugenschmidt, J. 2002. Concrete bridge inspection with a mobile GPR system. Journal Construction and Building Materials, 16, 147-154.
  4. Koşaroğlu, S., Taştan, E., and Bilim, F. 2016.
  5. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi Binasının Yer Radarı (GPR) yöntemi ile hasarsız incelenmesi. BEÜ Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 5, 77-85 (Turkish). Leucci, G., Masini, N., and Persico, R. 2012. Time–frequency analysis of GPR data to investigate the damage of monumental buildings. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 9, 81-91.
  6. Solla, M., Lorenzo, H., Riveiro, B., and Rial, F.I. (2011). Non-destructive methodologies in the assessment of hte masonry arch bridge of Traba, Spain. Engineering Failure Analysis, 18, 828-835.
  7. Varnavina, A.V., Khamzin, A. K., Sneed, L.H., Torgashov, E.V., Anderson, N.L., Maerz, N.H., and Boyko, K.J. 2015. Concrete bridge deck assessment: Relationship between GPR data and concrete removal depth measurements collected after hydrodemolition. Construction and Building Materials, 99, 26-38.