SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bitlis Eren University Journal of Science and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 16 Issue: 1

Efficiency Analysis of The Synchronous Condenser Operating Mode in Hydroelectric Power Plants in Terms of Water Use

Murat Bahar(BİTLİS EREN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, LİSANSÜSTÜ EĞİTİM ENSTİTÜSÜ)0009-0004-3872-8790
Zeki Argunhan(BITLIS EREN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE)0000-0002-3349-3409
Emin El(BİTLİS EREN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6596-9654
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results demonstrate that hydroelectric power plants, even during periods of water scarcity, can act as strategic "reactive power centers" rather than remaining idle, thereby contributing highly efficiently to grid optimization and long-term sustainable water management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Global climate change and the resulting water scarcity necessitate innovative and efficient approaches in the operation of hydroelectric power plants.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the effects of operating the four electricity generation units at the Alpaslan-1 Hydroelectric Power Plant in SC mode on water usage and energy efficiency were analyzed experimentally.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results demonstrate that hydroelectric power plants, even during periods of water scarcity, can act as strategic "reactive power centers" rather than remaining idle, thereby contributing highly efficiently to grid optimization and long-term sustainable water management.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2014-2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Hydroelectric · Energy · Synchronous Condenser

Abstract

Global climate change and the resulting water scarcity necessitate innovative and efficient approaches in the operation of hydroelectric power plants. Although active electricity generation may come to a halt as water levels drop to critical thresholds during drought periods, the potential of these facilities to contribute to grid stability through the synchronous condenser (SC) mode persists. In this study, the effects of operating the four electricity generation units at the Alpaslan-1 Hydroelectric Power Plant in SC mode on water usage and energy efficiency were analyzed experimentally. During the test process, the units were operated in SC mode for a total of 172 minutes; the facility drew 72 MVAr of reactive power from the grid without performing active electricity generation, thereby providing a total of 52.54 MVArh of reactive energy support to the system. By evaluating the 11-year hydrological data of the plant covering the years 2014-2024, drought periods were determined according to the long-term average, and the strategic advantages of operating the plant in SC mode during these times were demonstrated. According to the findings, a water saving of 575443.2 m³ was achieved in the reservoir thanks to this short-term operation of 172 minutes. It has been calculated that the approximately 115.4 MWh of energy that this saved water would generate if converted to active production would be sufficient to meet the annual electricity needs of 38 households. Furthermore, it was determined that 91.37 MVArh of reactive energy could be provided to the grid for every 1 hm³ of water retained in the reservoir due to the SC mode in drought years. These results demonstrate that hydroelectric power plants, even during periods of water scarcity, can act as strategic "reactive power centers" rather than remaining idle, thereby contributing highly efficiently to grid optimization and long-term sustainable water management.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bahar, M., Argunhan, Z., El, E. (2026). Efficiency Analysis of The Synchronous Condenser Operating Mode in Hydroelectric Power Plants in Terms of Water Use. Bitlis Eren University Journal of Science and Technology, Volume: 16 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.17678/beuscitech.1830218

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. S. Wang, L. Xing, H. Chen, Impact of marine industrial structure on environmental efficiency, Manag. Environ. Qual. An Int. J. 31 (2020) 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-06-2019-0119.
  2. Q. Zhu, X. Li, F. Li, D. Zhou, The potential for energy saving and carbon emission reduction in China’s regional industrial sectors, Sci. Total Environ. 716 (2020) 135009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135009.
  3. A. Barragán-Escandón, S. Arostegui Gutiérrez, E. Zalamea-Leon, X. Serrano-Guerrero, Green Hydrogen from Hydroelectric Energy: Assessing the Potential at the Abanico Power Plant in Morona Santiago Province, RE&PQJ (2024) 59–64. https://doi.org/10.52152/3914.
  4. E. El, G. Çakmak, Z. Argunhan, C. Yildiz, Experimental investigation of solar stills integrated with Solar water heating collectors, Isi Bilim. Ve Tek. Dergisi/ J. Therm. Sci. Technol. 37 (2017).
  5. Z. Argunhan, H.L. Yücel, C. Yldız, Determination of Gas Potential and Urban Solid Waste Management in Elazığ, Bitlis Eren Univ. J. Sci. Technol. 13 (2023) 198–214. https://doi.org/10.17678/beuscitech.1384802.
  6. A.[Internet], Global Electricity Review;2024 [cited 2024 December 31], (2024). https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/global-electricity-review-2024/global-electricity-trends/.
  7. X. Lu, M.B. McElroy, W. Peng, S. Liu, C.P. Nielsen, H. Wang, Challenges faced by China compared with the US in developing wind power, Nat. Energy 1 (2016) 16061. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.61.
  8. A. Bobat, Thermal Pollution Caused by Hydropower Plants, in: 2015: pp. 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16024-5_2.
  9. 2024 World Hydropower Outlook, International Hydropower Association, 2025. https://www.hydropower.org/publications/2024-world-hydropower-outlook.
  10. A.[Internet], Monthly Energy and Natural Resources Bulletin [cited 2026 April 29], Repub. TÜRKİYE Minist. ENERGY Nat. Resour. (n.d.). https://enerji.gov.tr/bilgi-merkezi-yayinlar-aylik-enerji-kaynaklar-bulteni.
  11. S.I. Rychkov, Reactive power control services based on a generator operating as a synchronous condenser, Power Technol Eng 46 (2013) 405–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-013-0369-6.
  12. J. Dixon, L. Moran, J. Rodriguez, R. Domke, Reactive Power Compensation Technologies: State-of-the-Art Review, Proc. IEEE 93 (2005) 2144–2164. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2005.859937.
  13. Yuxin Han, Laijun Chen, Hongliang Ma, Zhaojian Wang, Optimization of reactive power compensation for distribution power system with small hydro power, in: 2014 Int. Conf. Power Syst. Technol., IEEE, 2014: pp. 2915–2920. https://doi.org/10.1109/POWERCON.2014.6993939.
  14. M.L. Hendry, J.C. McGough, Synchronous Condensing Using the Generator of Peak Load Plant, in: Vol. 4 Heat Transf. Electr. Power; Ind. Cogener., American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1115/95-GT-273.
  15. S.S. Kalsi, D. Madura, M. Ingram, Superconductor Synchronous Condenser for Reactive Power Support in an Electric Grid, IEEE Trans. Appiled Supercond. 15 (2005) 2146–2149. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2005.849481.
  16. E. Vagnoni, Two-phase flow phenomena in hydraulic turbines and pump-turbines operating in synchronous condenser mode, EPFL, 2018. https://infoscience.epfl.ch/entities/publication/af405f9b-47f4-4bf8-8f2c-8e4ff322c47d.
  17. K. Kumar, A.K. Singh, R.P. Singh, Synchronous Condensing Mode Operation of Hydropower Plants, in: 2020 6th Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Commun. Syst., IEEE, Coimbatore, India, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCS48705.2020.9074286.
  18. D. Valentín, A. Presas, C. Valero, M. Egusquiza, E. Egusquiza, Synchronous condenser operation in Francis turbines: Effects in the runner stress and machine vibration, Renew. Energy 146 (2020) 890–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.041.
  19. G.A. Vaidya, N. Gopalakrishnan, Y.P. Nerkar, Reactive power pricing structure for hydroelectric power station in condenser mode operation, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 33 (2011) 1420–1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2011.06.022.
  20. F.O. Igbinovia, G. Fandi, Z. Muller, J. Svec, J. Tlusty, Cost implication and reactive power generating potential of the synchronous condenser, in: 2016 2nd Int. Conf. Intell. Green Build. Smart Grid, IEEE, 2016: pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGBSG.2016.7539450.
  21. P. Li, D.Z. Zhu, J.A. Crossman, Hydropower turbine-generated total dissolved gas supersaturation during synchronous condense operations, Ecol. Inform. 92 (2025) 103469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103469.
  22. M. Bahar, Z. Argunhan, Hidrolik Santrallerin Senkron Kompanze Modunda Çalıştırılmasının Faydaları, in: S. Soygüder (Ed.), Makine Mühendisliği Alanında Uluslararası Araştırmalar-IV, Eğitim Yayınevi, 2025: pp. 41–65.
  23. M. Bahar, Hidroelektrik Santrallerin Senkron Kompanze Modunda Çalıştırılmasının Enerji Verimliliğine Etkisi, Bitlis Eren University, 2026.
  24. P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control, Third Edition, CRC Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/b12113.
  25. Hydropower Plant Electrical and Mechanical Equipment Guidelines, 2016.
  26. L.M. Tallaksen, H.A.J. Van Lanen, Processes and Estimation Methods for Streamflow and Groundwater, in: Hydrol. Drought (Second Ed.), Elsevier, 2024: pp. 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819082-1.00009-6.
  27. Reactive power compensation analyses and planning procedure, 1989. https://www.e-cigre.org/publications/detail/030-reactive-power-compensation-analyses-and-planning-procedure.html.
  28. Electricity Generation Co., Alpaslan-1 Hydroelectric Power Plant 2021 Annual Activity Report, internal report submitted to the General Directorate of Electricity Generation Co., 2021.
  29. Enerji Piyasası Düzenleme Kurumu, Elektrik Piyasası Sektör Raporu, Ankara, 2023. https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/4-14475/2023-.
  30. L. Lıudvınavıčıus, The Methods of Reactive Power Compensation in the 25 kV, 50 Hz Contact Neteowk, Transp. Probl. 13 (2018) 59–68. https://doi.org/10.21307/tp.2018.13.1.6.