Journals / Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

VIEW OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE THEORY IN SPORT MANAGEMENT CONSTITUTION

SPORUN YÖNETSEL YAPISINDA ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET KURAMINA BAKIŞ

Pages
48–62
Publication Date
2010-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this reason in order to obtain success in national and international competition every aspect of the sport, the sport manager who has the power of directing and managing sport beware of the organizational and individual success depend on the justice approach to organization workers and as well as every innovation progress

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was performed to show the sport manager to importance of the organizational justice which affects on the attitude and behavior of the sport organization workers, in order to obtain organizational and individual success.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is necessary to realize the factors which negative effects on people performance and accounting the human requirements and expectations because the human factor is really important in the area of social, political, economy and management in order to provide productivity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this reason in order to obtain success in national and international competition every aspect of the sport, the sport manager who has the power of directing and managing sport beware of the organizational and individual success depend on the justice approach to organization workers and as well as every innovation progress
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:örgütsel adalet · örgütsel adalet boyutları · dağıtımsal adalet

Abstract

This study was performed to show the sport manager to importance of the organizational justice which affects on the attitude and behavior of the sport organization workers, in order to obtain organizational and individual success. It is necessary to realize the factors which negative effects on people performance and accounting the human requirements and expectations because the human factor is really important in the area of social, political, economy and management in order to provide productivity. This study was prepared with theoretical frame and under the light of related literature. It was evaluated in sportive extent of perceptional styles of the distributional, procedural and Interactional justice types is accepted as organizational justice variables in perceptional As a result the sport of today became a sector as economical mean and industry. Management of sport cannot be thought separated from general management. For this reason in order to obtain success in national and international competition every aspect of the sport, the sport manager who has the power of directing and managing sport beware of the organizational and individual success depend on the justice approach to organization workers and as well as every innovation progress

Özet

Bu araştırma, spor örgüt çalışanlarının tutum ve davranışlarına etki eden örgütsel adalet algılamalarının, örgütsel ve bireysel başarılarının sağlanmasında, spor yöneticilerinin hassasiyet göstermeleri gereken bir durum olduğunu vurgulamak amacı ile yapılmıştır. Toplumsal, siyasal, ekonomi ve yönetim alanlarında, verim ve üretkenliğin sağlanmasında insan unsurunun ön plana çıkması, kişilerin performanslarını olumsuz etkileyen faktörlerin göz önüne alınıp, ihtiyaç ve beklentilerine cevap vermeyi önemli kılmaktadır. Bu anlamda kuramsal bir çerçeve oluşturularak hazırlanan çalışma, ilgili literatür kaynaklar ışığı altında, örgütsel adalet değişkenleri olarak kabul edilen dağıtımsal, işlemsel ve etkileşimsel adalet türlerinin sporsal boyuttaki algılanış biçimleri ele alınarak değerlendirilmeye çalışılmıştır. Sonuç olarak günümüz sporu, ekonomik anlamda büyük bir sektör ve endüstri haline gelmiştir. Spor yönetiminin genel yönetim anlayışından ayrı tutulmasının mümkün olmadığı düşünüldüğünde, sporun sevk ve idaresini elinde bulunduran spor yöneticilerinin, sporun her boyutunda ulusal ve uluslararası rekabete ayak uydurabilmesi, her türlü inovasyonel gelişmelerin yanı sıra, örgüt çalışanlarına adaletli yaklaşım sergilemeleri kurumsal ve bireysel başarı için önemli görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARADEMİR, T., ÇOBAN, B. (2010). VIEW OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE THEORY IN SPORT MANAGEMENT CONSTITUTION. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 48–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/742052

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M., “Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, Interactional justice, Perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust” Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 295–305, 2003.
  2. Anderson, D. M., Shınew, K. J., “Gender Equity In The Context Of Organizational Justice: A Closer Look At A Reoccuring Issue In The Field”, Journal Of Leisure Research, Vol. 35, No. 2, s. 229, 2003.
  3. Aykut, S., “Örgütsel Adalet, Birey -Örgüt Uyumu İle Çalışanların İşle İlgili Tutumları (Pendik İlçesi Örneği)”. (yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul. Yeditepe üniversitesi, sosyal bilimler enstitüsü. 2007.
  4. Barling, J., & Phillips, M., “Interactional, formal, and distributive justice in the workplace: An exploratory study” Journal of Psychology, 127 (6), 649-656, 1993.
  5. Ben-Ari, R., Tsur, Y., and Har-Even, D., “Procedural justice, stress appraisal, and athletes' attitudes” International Journal of Stress Management. Vol 13(1), 23–44, 2006.
  6. Beugre, C. D., “Managing Fairness in Organizations”, Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group, s.84, 1998.
  7. Beugre, C. D., Baron R. A.,” Perceptions of Systemic Justice: The Effects of Distburitive, Procedural and Interactional Justice”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.31, No: II, s. 326, 2001.
  8. Bies, R. J., Interactional (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 89-118).
  9. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001.
  10. Bies, R. J., Moag, J. S.,“Interactional justice, communication criteria for fairness”,In, M. H. Bazerman, R. Sheppard, & B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research in negotiations in organizations. 1: 43–55, 1986.
  11. Cohen-Charash, Y., Spector, P.E., “The role of Justice in organizations: a metaanalysis”. Org Behav Human Decis Process; 86(2):278–321, 2001.
  12. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Judge, T. A., “Justice and Personality: Using Integrative Theories to Derive Moderators of Justice”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, s.2, 2005.
  13. Cowherd, D. M., Levıne, D. I., “Product Quality and Pay Equity between Lower-Level Employees and Top Management: An Investigation Of Distributive Justice Theory”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 2, s. 303-304, 1992.
  14. Cropanzano, R. & Ambrose, M.L., “ Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic Perspective and a research agenda. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in Organizational Justice (pp. 119