Journals / Balkan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 16

Determination of Performance Criteria with AHP Method in Industrial 4.0 Transformation

Endüstriyel Dönüşüm Sürecinde AHP Yöntemi ile Performans Kriterlerinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
105–117
Publication Date
2019-07-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, a roadmap and self-assessment study was conducted to help to determine the industry 4.0 strategies for both production and service sector.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the light of technological advances, mechanical structures are transformed into digital systems and this transformation has been defined as the industry 4.0 revolution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the opportunities provided by the Industry 4.0 digital revolution, businesses can become more powerful than their competitors by increasing their production and service capabilities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, a roadmap and self-assessment study was conducted to help to determine the industry 4.0 strategies for both production and service sector.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Endüstri 4.0 · Dijital Dönüşüm · Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP)

Abstract

In the light of technological advances, mechanical structures are transformed into digital systems and this transformation has been defined as the industry 4.0 revolution. With the opportunities provided by the Industry 4.0 digital revolution, businesses can become more powerful than their competitors by increasing their production and service capabilities. However, many companies, especially in the manufacturing sector, have yet to understand how to integrate into this dizzying digital transformation. In this context, it is seen that a road map is needed for enterprises to evaluate themselves and to participate with the industry 4.0 transformation. In this study, it is aimed to analyze the Industry 4.0 process and to create a road map that will ensure the correct transformation in enterprises. In the process of industrial transformation, it is necessary to determine new site-specific parameters and make evaluations based on these parameters. For this purpose, as wide a possible literature has been examined and then, with the help of experts, basic criteria have been determined using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). In addition, a roadmap and self-assessment study was conducted to help to determine the industry 4.0 strategies for both production and service sector.

Özet

Teknolojik gelişmelerin ışığında mekanik yapılar, büyük oranda dijital sistemlere dönüşmüş ve bu dönüşüm günümüzde endüstri 4.0 devrimi olarak tanımlanmıştır. Endüstri 4.0 dijital devriminin sağladığı imkanlar ile işletmeler, üretim ve hizmet yeteneklerini arttırarak rakiplerine oranla daha rekabetçi hale gelmişlerdir. Fakat özellikle üretim sektöründe olan birçok firma, henüz bu baş döndürücü dijital dönüşüme nasıl entegre olunacağı konusunda sıkıntı yaşadıkları anlaşılmaktadır. Bu kapsamda işletmelerin kendilerini değerlendirebilmesi ve endüstri 4.0 dönüşümüne katılabilmeleri için bir yol haritasına ihtiyaç olduğu görülmektedir. Bu çalışma ile Endüstri 4.0 süreci analiz edilerek işletmelerde doğru dönüşümün gerçekleştirilmesini sağlayacak bir yol haritasının oluşturulması amaçlanmıştır. Endüstriyel dönüşüm sürecinde alana özgü yeni parametrelerin belirlenmesi ve bu parametrelere bağlı değerlendirmelerin yapılması gerekmektedir. Bu amaçla mümkün olduğunca geniş bir literatür incelenmiş ve sonrasında uzmanlar yardımı ile temel kriterler Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi (AHP) kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca işletmeler için endüstri 4.0 stratejilerini belirlemelerinde yardımcı olabilecek bir yol haritası ve öz değerlendirme çalışması yapılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTEMEL, E., ÖZEL, S., GÜRSEV, S. (2019). Determination of Performance Criteria with AHP Method in Industrial 4.0 Transformation. Balkan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 16, 105–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/739689

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adeyeri, S., Kanisuru, M., Khumbulani, M., & Olukorede, T. (2015). Integration of agent technology into manufacturing enterprise: A review and platform for industry 4.0. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 1625-1635.
  2. Amatoa, F., & Moscato, F. (2017), Exploiting cloud and workflow patterns for the analysis of composite cloud services. Future Generation Computer Systems, 67, 255-265.
  3. Angeles, R. (2005). RFID technologies: Supply-chain applications and implementation issues. Information systems management, 22, 51-65. Ângelo, A., Barata, J., da Cunha, P. R., & Almeida, V. (2017). Digital transformation in the pharmaceutical compounds supply chain: Design of a service ecosystem with e-labeling. In European, Mediterranean, and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems, 307-323.
  4. ARIZ (2017). Human–machine cooperation in Industry 4.0. (Erişim: 30.08.2018), https://www.festo.com/group/en/ cms/12690.htm Badawi, H., Dong, H., & El Saddika, A. (2017). Mobile cloud-based physical activity advisory system using biofeedback sensors. Future Generation Computer Systems, 66, 59-70.
  5. Bagheri, B., Yang S., Kao, H. A., & Lee, J. (2015). Cyber-physical systems architecture for selfaware machines in industry 4.0 environment. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 1622-1627.
  6. Baheti, R., & Gill, H. (2011). Cyber-physical systems. The impact of control technology, 12, 161-166.
  7. Baygin, M., Yetis, H., Karakose, M., & Akin, E. (2016). An effect analysis of industry 4.0 to higher education. 15th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), July 10-12, 2017,
  8. Ohrid, Macedonia. Bellini, P., Bruno, I., Cenni, D., & Nesi, P. (2017). Managing cloud via smart cloud engine and knowledge base. IEEE 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing, 27 June-2 July 2015,
  9. New York, USA. Biral, A., Centenaro, M., Zanella, A., Vangelista, L., & Zorzi, M. (2015). The challenges of M2M massive access in wireless cellular networks. Digital Communications and Networks, 1(1), 1-19.
  10. Bourke, R., & Mentis, M. (2014). An assessment framework for inclusive education: integrating assessment approaches. Assesment in Education, 21(4), 384-397.
  11. Chen, T., & Chiu, M. (2017). Development of a cloud-based factory simulation system for enabling ubiquitous factory simulation. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 45, 133–143.
  12. Elmangousha, A., Coricib, A., Steinkeb, R., Co