Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

Poor quality of life and functioning in euthymic mood disorders

Pages
340–348
Publication Date
2022-10-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, it was determined that the main factor affecting the QOL was residual depressive symptoms rather than type of mood disorder.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study’s aim is to examine the relationship between clinical/demographic characteristics the quality of life (QOL) and functionality in patients with mood disorders.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Total of 280 participants, including participants with bipolar disorder I (BD I), bipolar disorder II (BD II) major depressive disorder (MDD) in remission, and healty control subjects (HC), were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, it was determined that the main factor affecting the QOL was residual depressive symptoms rather than type of mood disorder.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bipolar disorder I · bipolar disorder II · major depressive disorder

Abstract

Aim: This study’s aim is to examine the relationship between clinical/demographic characteristics the quality of life (QOL) and functionality in patients with mood disorders. Material and Method: Total of 280 participants, including participants with bipolar disorder I (BD I), bipolar disorder II (BD II) major depressive disorder (MDD) in remission, and healty control subjects (HC), were included. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument Short Form Scale (WHOQOL-BREF), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), and General Functioning Assessment Scale (GAF) were used. The data were evaluated with the SPSS 25.0 statistical program. Results: Compared with HC, patients with MDD had the lowest scores in the QOL total and subdomain scores (p=.001). There was a significant negative correlation between the QOL scores and the BDI scores, but there was a positive correlation between the educational level and the total QOL and social, enviromental domain scores. There was a significant negative correlation between the total QOL and physical domain and the number of depressive episodes. There was a significant negative correlation between the social domain and the number of hospitalizations, but there was a significant positive correlation between the physical, enviromental domain scores and the age of first episode. Conclusion: QOL between MDD is lower than that of BD. Educational level, number of depressive episodes and hospitalizations, suicide attemps, age of first episode, and BDI scores correlated with QOL. Additionally, it was determined that the main factor affecting the QOL was residual depressive symptoms rather than type of mood disorder.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCAKAYA, H., HARMANCI, H., YÖRÜBULUT, S. (2022). Poor quality of life and functioning in euthymic mood disorders. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 340–348. https://ajindex.com/articles/733719

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria Reference Book. Köroğlu E. (Translation Editor). Firsth Ed., Ankara: Hekimler Yayın Birliği, 63-113.
  2. Saddock BJ, Saddock VA. Clinical Psychiatry. Aydın H, Bozkurt A (Translation Editor) Second ed., Ankara: Gunes Kitabevi Ltd. Sti., 2007, 1559-1718.
  3. Öztürk MO, Uluşahin N.A. Mental Health and Disorders. Fifteenth Ed., Ankara: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 2016, s. 261-262 National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Major Depression. 2019 National Institute of Mental Health Bipolar disorder (NIMH BD). Bipolar Disorder. January 2020
  4. Wong JJ, Jones N, Timko C, Humphreys K. Exclusion criteria and generalizability in bipolar disorder treatment trials. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2018; 9: 130-4. Group W. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Sos Sci Med 1995; 41: 1403-9.
  5. Michalak EE, Yatham LN, Kolesar S, Lam RW. Bipolar disorder and quality of life: a patient-centered perspective. Qual Life Res 2006; 15: 25-37. Bonnín CdM, Reinares M, Martínez-Arán A, et al. Improving functioning, quality of life, and well-being in patients with bipolar disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacology 2019; 22: 467-77. Saarijärvi S, Salminen JK, Toikka T, Raitasalo R. Health-related quality of life among patients with major depression. Nord J Psychiatry 2002; 56: 261-4.
  6. IsHak WW, Mirocha J, James D, et al. Quality of life in major depressive disorder before/after multiple steps of treatment and one‐year follow‐up. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2015; 131: 51-60.
  7. Judd LL, Schettler PJ, Solomon DA, et al. Psychosocial disability and work role function compared across the long-term course of bipolar I, bipolar II and unipolar major depressive disorders. J Affect Disord 2008; 108: 49-58.
  8. Van der Voort TY, Seldenrijk A, van Meijel B, et al. Functional versus syndromal recovery in patients with major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2015; 76: e809-14. Hisli N. A study on the validity of Beck Depression Inventory. Turk J Psychol 1988; 6: 118-23.
  9. Ulusoy M, Şahin NH, Erkmen H. Turkish version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory: Psychometric properties. J Cogn Psychother 1998; 12: 163-72.
  10. Karadağ F, Oral ET, Aran Yalçın F, Erten E. Reliability and validity of Turkish translation of Young Mania Rating Scale. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2002; 13: 107-14. Fidaner H. Measuring quality of life WHOQOL-100 and WHOQOL-bref. J Psychiatr Psychol Psychopharmacol 1999; 7: 23-