SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3

Success Criteria in Dental Implants and Maintenance of Implant Health

Dental İmplantlarda Başarı Kriterleri ve İmplant Sağlığının Sürdürülmesi

Gülfem ERGÜN
Ferhan EĞİLMEZ
Pages
47–54
Publication Date
2007-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thisstudy aims to determine the success criteria, causes of failure of dental implants,and to give information about the applications for protecting the stability of theimplant

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:For a successful implant therapy, treatmentplanning and evaluations made before theimplant surgery are as important as theclinical follow-up after the surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Treatment strategiesdescribed for the maintenance of the healthof peri-implant tissues are explained.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thisstudy aims to determine the success criteria, causes of failure of dental implants,and to give information about the applications for protecting the stability of theimplant
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:dental implant · baflarıkriterleri · sağlığın sürdürülmesi

Abstract

For a successful implant therapy, treatmentplanning and evaluations made before theimplant surgery are as important as theclinical follow-up after the surgery. In general, these success criteria include periodontal, prosthetic, radiological evaluations and patient opinion about the treatment. In our study, failures in dentalimplants were classified as early and late;and conditions that cause failures in dentalimplants were reviewed. The criteriadescribed for evaluating implant health,precautionary measures when implanthealth is damaged and treatment optionsare determined. Treatment strategiesdescribed for the maintenance of the healthof peri-implant tissues are explained. Thisstudy aims to determine the success criteria, causes of failure of dental implants,and to give information about the applications for protecting the stability of theimplant

Özet

-

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜN, G., EĞİLMEZ, F. (2007). Success Criteria in Dental Implants and Maintenance of Implant Health. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 3, 47–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/728974

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Osseointegration: a requiem for the periodontal ligament? Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1991; 11: 88–91.
  2. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance. Int J Prosthodont 1993; 6: 95–105. Bergman B. Evaluation of the results of treatment with osseointegrated implants by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 114-5.
  3. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 11-25.
  4. Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegra- ted endosseoz implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 567- 72. Naert IE, Duyck JA, Hosny MM, Van Steenberghe D.Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients. Part I: An up to 15-years clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12: 237-44.
  5. Romeo E, Lops D, Amorfini L, Chiapasco M, Ghisolfi M, Vogel G. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of small- diameter (3.3-mm) implants followed for 1–7 years: a lon- gitudinal study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2006; 17: 139–48.
  6. Roos J, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Grondahl K, Albrektsson T. A qualitative and quantitative method for evaluating implant success: a 5-year retrospective analysis of the Branemark implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997; 12: 504-14.
  7. Ferrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S. Dental implants place- ment in conjunction with osteotome sinus flor elevation: a 12-year life-table analysis from a prospective study on 588 ITIs implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2006; 17: 194–205.
  8. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non- submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow- screw implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1990; 1: 33–40.
  9. Karoussis IK, Bragger U, Salvi GE, Burgin W, Lang NP. Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITIs Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004; 15: 8–17.
  10. Mombelli A, Lang, NP. Clinical parameters for the evalu- ation of dental implants. Periodontol 2000 1994; 4: 81–6.
  11. Bragger U, Gerber C, Joss A, Haenni S, Meier A, Hashorva E, Lang NP. Patterns of tissue remodeling after placement of ITI dental implants using an osteotome technique: a longitudinal radiographic case cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Apr