Journals / ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Surface Properties of Dental İmplants and İnteractions With The Biological Enviroment: Part II: İmplant Surfaces and Properties

Dental İmplant Yüzey Özellikleri ve Biyolojik Ortamla Etkileşimler: Bölüm II: İmplant Yüzeyleri ve Özellikleri

Pages
821–827
Publication Date
2011-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this paper the main surface properties of titanium dental implants are reviewed and presented with the literature findings

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Titanium and its alloys are the most commonly preferred materials for endosseous implants in dentistry due to the high degree of biocompatibility and good mechanical properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The surface properties of titanium dental implants can modulate tissue reactions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this paper the main surface properties of titanium dental implants are reviewed and presented with the literature findings
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dental İmplant · Titanyum · Yüzey Topografisi

Abstract

Titanium and its alloys are the most commonly preferred materials for endosseous implants in dentistry due to the high degree of biocompatibility and good mechanical properties. The surface properties of titanium dental implants can modulate tissue reactions. Important surface properties are divided into two categories: topographical and chemical properties. Topography is associated with the degree of roughness of the surface and the orientation of surface irregularities. Chemical properties include chemical composition of the surface. In this paper the main surface properties of titanium dental implants are reviewed and presented with the literature findings

Özet

Titanyum ve alaşımları, yüksek biyouyumluluk ve üstün mekanik özelliklerine bağlı olarak dişhekimliğinde kemik içi implantlar için en çok tercih edilen materyallerdir. Titanyum dental implantların yüzey özellikleri doku reaksiyonlarını düzenleyebilmektedir. İmplant yüzey özellikleri topografik ve kimyasal özellikler olmak üzere iki kategoriye ayrılmaktadır. Topografi yüzeyin pürüzlülük derecesi ve yüzey düzensizliklerinin oryantasyonu ile ilişkilidir. Kimyasal özellikler yüzeyin kimyasal kompozisyonunu içermektedir. Bu makalede titanyum dental implantların temel yüzey özellikleri gözden geçirilmiş ve literatür bulguları eşliğinde sunulmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

KILINÇ, Y., ERGÜVEN, S. S., ERKMEN, E. (2011). Surface Properties of Dental İmplants and İnteractions With The Biological Enviroment: Part II: İmplant Surfaces and Properties. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 821–827. https://ajindex.com/articles/728901

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ellingsen JE. Surface configurations of dental imp- lants. Periodontol. 2000. 17: 36-46, 1998.
  2. Rupp F., Scheideler L., Rehbein D., Axmann D., Geis- Gerstorfer J. Roughness induced dynamic changes of wettability of acid etched titanium imp- lant modifications. Biomaterials. 25: 1429-1438, 2004. Steinemann SG. Titanium- the material of choice? Peridontol. 2000. 17:7-21, 1998. Oshida Y. Bioscience and Bioengineering of Tita- nium Materials Elsevier; 2006.
  3. Puelo DA., Thomas MV. Implant Surfaces. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 50: 323-338, 2006.
  4. Vörös J, Wieland M, Ruiz- Taylor L, Textor M, Bru- nette DM. Characterization of Titanium Surfaces. Titanium in Medicine. New York: Springer; 2001.
  5. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfa- ces: Part 1-Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int. J. Prosthodont. 17:536- 543, 2004.
  6. Chang PC., Lang NP.,Giannobile WV. Evaluation of functional Dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants: A revi- ew. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 21:1-12, 2010.
  7. Gittens RA., McLachlan T., Olivares-Navarrete R., Cai Y., Berner S., Tannenbaum R., Scwartz Z., Sandhage KH., Boyan BD. The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and na- noscale features on cell proliferation and differenti- ation. Biomaterials. 32: 3395-3403, 2011.
  8. Lavenus S., Louarn G., Layrolle P. Nanotechnology and dental implants. Int. J. Biomater. 915327, 2010. Le Guéhennec L., Soueidan A., Layrolle P., Amou- riq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent. Mater. 23: 844- 854, 2007.
  9. Lorenzoni M., Pertl C., Zhang K., Wimmer G., Walther A. Immediate loading of single-tooth imp- lants in the anterior maxilla. Preliminary results after one year. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 14: 180-187, 2003.
  10. Klinger MM., Rahemtulla F., Prince CW., Lucas LC., Lemons JE. Proteoglycans at the bone-implant interface. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 9: 449-463, 1998.
  11. Mendoça G., Mendoça DB., Arago FJ., Cooper LF. Advancing dental implant surface technology- from micron to surface nanotopography. Biomateri- als. 29: 3822-3835, 2008.
  12. Wennerberg A., Hallgren C., Johansson C., Da- nelli S.A histomorphometric evaluation of screw- shaped implants each prepared with two syrface roughnesses. Clin. Oral Implants Res.:11-19, 1999.
  13. Buser D., Schenk R., Steinemann S., Fiorellini J., Fox C., Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium