SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Distraction Osteogenesis In Dentistry

Diş Hekimliğinde Distraksiyon Osteogenezi

Mustafa DAĞ
Ümit KARAÇAYLL
Canan DAĞ
Pages
979–986
Publication Date
2011-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Distraction osteogenesis techniques and phases, indications, advantages and recent studies were reviewed in this article

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Treatment of bone deficiencies have always been difficult applications in maxillofacial surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Several surgical procedures were described to ensure the required position and thickness of jaw bones prior to dental and skeletal treatments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Distraction osteogenesis techniques and phases, indications, advantages and recent studies were reviewed in this article
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Distraksiyon osteogenezi · İlizarov teknikleri · Kemik kazanımı

Abstract

Treatment of bone deficiencies have always been difficult applications in maxillofacial surgery. Several surgical procedures were described to ensure the required position and thickness of jaw bones prior to dental and skeletal treatments. Distraction osteogenesis is known as a relatively new treatment option in dentistry. This method can be used for orthognathic and implant surgery and also prior to prosthodontic treatment. Distraction osteogenesis techniques and phases, indications, advantages and recent studies were reviewed in this article

Özet

Diş hekimliğinde kemik yetersizliklerinin tedavisi her zaman zorluklar içeren bir alan olmuştur. Hastaların dental ve iskeletsel tedavileri öncesinde çene kemiklerinin istenilen konum ve kalınlığa getirilmeleri için birçok cerrahi prosedür tanımlanmış ve uygulanmıştır. Distraksiyon osteogenezi ise diş hekimliğinde yeni sayılabilecek bir tedavi seçeneği olarak bilinmektedir. Bu yöntem ortognatik cerrahide, protetik tedavi ve implant cerrahisi öncesinde kullanılabilmektedir. Bu derlemede distraksiyon osteogenezi teknikleri ve safhaları ile diş hekimliğindeki endikasyonları, kullanım alanları ve avantajları incelenmiş olup distraksiyon osteogenezi ile ilgili son çalışmalardan bahsedilmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

DAĞ, M., KARAÇAYLL, Ü., DAĞ, C. (2011). Distraction Osteogenesis In Dentistry. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 979–986. https://ajindex.com/articles/728880

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Sailhan F. Bone lengthening (Distraction Osteo- genesis): A literature review. Osteoporos. Int. 22:2011-2015, 2011. Polat HB. Lokal olarak uygulanan yağlı kalsiyum hikroksitin distraksiyon osteogenezi üzerine etki- lerinin deneysel olarak incelenmesi. Cumhuriyet Üni. Sağ. Bil. Ens. Ağız Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi AD – 2007,
  2. Doktora Tezi. Yen S.L., Shang W., Shuler C., Yamashita D.D. Orthodontic spring guidance of bilateral mandi- bular distraction in rabbits. Am. J. Orthod. Dento- facial. Orthop. 120: 435-442, 2001.
  3. Sencimen M., Aydintug Y.S., Ortakoglu K., Kars- lioglu Y., Gunhan O., Gunaydin Y. Histomorpho- metrical analysis of new bone obtained by dist- raction osteogenesis and osteogenesis by perios- teal distraction in rabbits. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 36:235-242, 2007.
  4. Hönig J.F., Grohmann U.A., Merten H.A. Facial bone distraction osteogenesis for correction of malocclusion: A more than 70-year-old concept in craniofacial surgery. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 109: 41-49, 2002. Ilizarov G.A. The principles of the Ilizarov met- hod. Bulletin of the Hospital For Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute 47: 1-17, 1989. Yazdurdıyev B. Distraksiyon Osteogenezinde yu- muşak doku değişiklikleri. İstanbul Üni. Sağ. Bil. Ens. Ağız, Diş, Çene Cerrahisi AD – 2006,
  5. Dok- tora Tezi. Samchukov M.L., Cope J.B., Cherkashin A.M. Crainofacial Distraction Osteogenesis. Harco- urt Health Sciences Company, Missouri, USA, Mosby, 2001; s:10-35.
  6. Annino D.J., Goguen L.A., Karmody C.S. Distrac- tion osteogenesis for reconstruction of mandibu- lar symphyseal defects. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 120:911-916, 1994.
  7. Mario J.I., David D.H., Gentry T., Khalid C., The Versatility of Distraction Osteogenesis in Cranio- facial Surgery. Arch. Facial Plast. Surg. 4:8-19, 2002.
  8. McCarthy J.G., Stelnicki E.J., Mehrara B.J., Lon- gaker M.T. Distraction osteogenesis of the cra- niofacial skeletion. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 107: 1812-1826, 2001.
  9. Swennen G., Schliephake H., Dempf R. Schierle H., Malavez C. Crainofacial distraction osteoge- nesis: a review of the literature: Part 1: Clinical studies. Int. J. Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 30:89- 103, 2001.
  10. Tavakoli K., Stewart K.J., Poole M.D. Distraksiyon osteogenesis in craniofacial surgery; A review. Ann. Plast. Surg. 40: 88-99, 1998.
  11. Moore C., Campbell P.M., Dechow P.C., Ellis M.L., Buschang P.H. Effects of latency on quality and quantity of bone produced by dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofa- cial Orthop. 140:470-478, 2011