SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Surface Roughening and Polishing in All-Ceramic Restorations

Tam Seramik Restorasyonlarda Yüzey Pürüzlendirme ve Polisaj

Hasan Hüseyin KOCAAĞAOĞLU
Hasan Önder GÜMÜŞ
Haydar ALBAYRAK
Pages
1409–1418
Publication Date
2013-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review is to give information about the surface roughness of dental ceramic restorations which affects their physical, chemical and biological properties

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The composition and microstructure of ceramic restorations are important components in order to provide an effective bonding.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Both hydrofluoric acid etching and airborne aluminium oxide particle abrasion have been used for micromechanical bonding on the surface of dental ceramic restorations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review is to give information about the surface roughness of dental ceramic restorations which affects their physical, chemical and biological properties
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Alumina · cam seramik · seramik restorasyon

Abstract

The composition and microstructure of ceramic restorations are important components in order to provide an effective bonding. Both hydrofluoric acid etching and airborne aluminium oxide particle abrasion have been used for micromechanical bonding on the surface of dental ceramic restorations. On the other hand, surface smoothness is also important in minimizing bacterial plaque retention on the dental restoration surfaces. For this reason, applications such as polishing and glazing are provided ceramic surfaces. Grinding and polishing are also needed to provide the ceramic dental restorative materials with proper fitting and occlusion. The aim of this review is to give information about the surface roughness of dental ceramic restorations which affects their physical, chemical and biological properties

Özet

Seramik restorasyonların içeriği ve yüzey yapısı etkili bir bağlanma sağlanabilmesi için önemlidir. Hem hidroflorik asit uygulaması hem de aluminyum oksit kumlama, seramik yüzeyinde mikromekanik bağlanma oluşturmak amacıyla kullanılmaktadır. Diğer taraftan, dental restorasyonların yüzeylerinde bakteriyel plak retansiyonunun minimal olmasını sağlamak amacıyla da yüzey pürüzsüzlüğü önemlidir. Bu amaçla seramik yüzeyler için polisaj ve glaze gibi işlemler uygulanmaktadır. Ayrıca aşındırma ve polisaj işlemlerine seramik restorasyonların kenar uyumu ve okluzal uyumları için de ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı dental seramiklerin fiziksel, kimyasal ve biyolojik özelliklerini etkileyen yüzey pürüzlülüğü konusunda bilgi vermektir

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCAAĞAOĞLU, H. H., GÜMÜŞ, H. Ö., ALBAYRAK, H. (2013). Surface Roughening and Polishing in All-Ceramic Restorations. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 1409–1418. https://ajindex.com/articles/728824

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ayad MF, Fahmy NZ, Rosenstiel SF. Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99:123-30.
  2. Cehreli MC, Kökat AM, Akça K. CAD/CAM Zirconia vs. slip-cast glass-infiltrated Alumina/ Zirconia all-ceramic crowns: 2-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17:49-55.
  3. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98:389-404.
  4. Osorio E, Toledano M, da Silveira BL, Osorio R. Effect of different surface treatments on In-Ceram Alumina roughness. An AFM study. J Dent. 2010;38:118-22.
  5. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials. 12th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier Saunders; 2013. p.224 Paravina RD, Powers JM. Esthetic Color Training in Dentistry. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2004. p.43 da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent. 2012;40:513- 21. Sarac D, Sarac YS, Yuzbasioglu E, Bal S. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96:122-8.
  6. Liu D, Pow EH, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP. Evaluation of four surface coating treatments for resin to zirconia bonding. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;32:300-9.
  7. Dilber E, Yavuz T, Kara HB, Ozturk AN. Comparison of the effects of surface treatments on roughness of two ceramic systems. Photomed Laser Surg. 2012;30:308-14.
  8. Ersu B, Yuzugullu B, Ruya Yazici A, Canay S. Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass- infiltrated alumina-ceramics prepared using various surface treatments. J Dent. 2009;37:848- 56. Thompson JY, Stoner BR, Piascik JR, Smith R. Adhesion/cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: Where are we now? Dent Mater. 2011;27:71-82.
  9. Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:479-88.
  10. Kara HB, Ozturk AN, Aykent F, Koc O, Ozturk B. The effect of different surface treatments on roughness and bond strength in low fusing ceramics. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26:599-604.
  11. Wolf DM, Powers JM, O’Keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents. Dent Mater. 1992;8:158-61.
  12. Jochen DG, Caputo AA. Composite resin repair of porcelain denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1977;38:673-9. Fe