Journals / Cumhuriyet Science Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3

Genoprotective Effects of Aqueous Extracts of Rosa Canina L. Fruits on Ethyl Methanesulfonate-Induced DNA Damage in Drosophila Melanogaster

Ethyl Methanesulfonate-Induced DNA Damage in Drosophila Melanogaster

Pages
241–247
Publication Date
2016-09-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained from RCwtr application groups, each group’s total clon frequencies decreased compared with 1 mM EMS application group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the possible genotoxic effects of ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) which are one of alkylating agent and genoprotective effects of Rosa canina L. fruit water extract (RCwtr) was studied with Drosophila wing somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Five different application groups (distilled water, 1 mM EMS, 1% RCwtr, 3% RCwtr and 5% RCwtr) were formed with preliminary studies. 3-day-old transheterozygous larvae of mwh/flr3 genotype of Drosophila melanogaster were fed chronically on the Drosophila instant medium (DIM) including the application groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained from RCwtr application groups, each group’s total clon frequencies decreased compared with 1 mM EMS application group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Paraben · Rosa canina · SMART

Abstract

Abstract. In this study, the possible genotoxic effects of ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) which are one of alkylating agent and genoprotective effects of Rosa canina L. fruit water extract (RCwtr) was studied with Drosophila wing somatic mutation and recombination test (SMART). Five different application groups (distilled water, 1 mM EMS, 1% RCwtr, 3% RCwtr and 5% RCwtr) were formed with preliminary studies. 3-day-old transheterozygous larvae of mwh/flr3 genotype of Drosophila melanogaster were fed chronically on the Drosophila instant medium (DIM) including the application groups. The wing slides of normal wing (mwh/flr3) phenotype individuals were prepared and examined under light microscope (400X).As a result of experiments, the total clone frequencies of distilled water control group, 1 mM EMS, 1% RCwtr, 3% RCwtr and 5% RCwtr application groups were determined as 0.15, 3.55, 2.58, 2.78 and 2.20, respectively. The difference between distilled water control group and 1 mM EMS application group is statistically significant (P<0.05). According to the results obtained from RCwtr application groups, each group’s total clon frequencies decreased compared with 1 mM EMS application group. It was found that the differences between the 1mM EMS and RCwtr. application groups were statistically important too (P<0.05). The findings demonstrate that the constituents of Rosa canina L. have great potential as a natural genoprotective product.Keywords: Rosa canina, SMART, Drosophila melanogaster, Ethyl methanesulfonate, genoprotective Özet. Bu çalışmada, alkilleyici ajanlardan birisi olan etil metansülfonatın olası genotoksik etkileri ve Rosa canina L. meyvelerinin su ekstraktının (RCsu) genomik koruyucu etkisi Drosophila kanat somatik mutasyon ve rekombinasyon testi (SMART) ile araştırılmıştır. Yapılan ön çalışmalar ile beş farklı uygulama grubu (saf su, 1 mM EMS, 1% RCsu, 3% RCsu ve 5% RCsu) hazırlanmıştır. Drosophila melanogaster’in mwh/flr3 genotipli 3. evre trans-heterozigot larvaları, uygulama gruplarını içeren hazır Drosophila besiyerinde kronik olarak beslenmiştir. Normal kanat fenotipli (mwh/flr3) bireylerin kanat preparatları hazırlanmış ve ışık mikroskobunda incelenmiştir (400X).

Özet

Deneylerin sonucunda saf su kontrol grubu, 1 mM EMS, %1 RCsu, %3 RCsu ve %5 RCsu uygulama gruplarının toplam klon frekansları sırasıyla 0.15, 3.55, 2.58, 2.78 ve 2.20 olarak belirlenmiştir. Saf su kontrol grubu ve 1 mM EMS uygulama grupları arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak önemlidir (P

🔖

Cite This Article

KASIMOĞLU, C., UYSAL, H. (2016). Genoprotective Effects of Aqueous Extracts of Rosa Canina L. Fruits on Ethyl Methanesulfonate-Induced DNA Damage in Drosophila Melanogaster. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3, 241–247. https://ajindex.com/articles/714423

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Gocke E., Burgin H., Muller L., Pfister T., 2009. Literature review on the genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, and carcinogenicity of ethyl methanesulfonate. Toxicol. Lett. 190, 254. Doak S.H., Jenkins G.J.S., Johnson G.E., Quick E., Parry E.M., Parry J.M., 2007. Mechanistic influences for mutation induction curves following exposure to DNA-reactive carcinogens. Cancer Res. 67, 3904. Anyinam C., 1995. Ecology and ethnomedicine: exploring links between current environmental crisis and indigenous medical practices. Soc. Sci. Med. 40, 321. Cemeroglu B., 1992. Basic analysis methods of fruit and vegetable processing industry. Biltav Press: Ankara, 381. Ozcan M., 2000. Antioxidant activity of seafennel (Crithmum maritimum L.) essential oil and rose (Rosa canina) extract on natural olive oil. Acta Aliment. Hung. 29, (4), 377. Serteser A., Kargıoglu M., Gok V., Bagcı Y., Ozcan M.M., Arslan D., 2008. Determination of antioxidant effects of some plant species wild growing in Turkey. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 59, (7-8), 643. Hvattum E., 2002. Determination of phenolic compounds in rose hip (Rosa canina) using liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry and diode-array detection. Rapid Commun. Mass Sp. 16, 655. Gao X., Björk L., Trajkovski V., Uggla M., 2000. Evaluation of antioxidant activities of rosehip ethanol extracts in different test systems. J. Sci. Food Agr., 80, 2021–2027.
  2. Daels-Rakotoarison D.A., Gressier B., Trotin F., Brunet C., Luyckx M., Dine T., Bailleul F., Cazin M., Cazin J.C., 2002. Effects of Rosa canina fruit extract on neutrophil respiratory burst. Phytother Res, 16, 157–161.
  3. Kılıcgun H., Altıner D. 2009. In vitro antioxidant effect of Rosa canina in different antioxidant test systems. Phcog. Res. 1, 417. Uysal H., Kizilet H., Ayar A. and Taheri A., 2015.
  4. The use of endemic Iranian plant, Echium amoenum against the ethyl methanesulfonate and the recovery of mutagenic effects, Toxicol. Ind. Health., 31, 44–51.
  5. Agrawal R.C., Pandey, S., 2009. Evaluation of anticarcinogenic and antimutagenic potential of Bauhinia variegata extract in Swiss albino mice. Asian Pac. J. Cancer P., 10, 913-916.
  6. Ünver S., Uysal H., 2014. Neonikotinoid İnsektisitlere Bağlı Olarak Drosophila melanogaster’in AChE Aktivitesinde Meydana Gelen Değişikliklerin Bitkisel Ekstraktlar ile Giderilmesi Üzerine Araştırmalar. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt 35, No 4. Kan Y., Orhan İ., Koca U., 2009. Fatty acid profi