SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

IRANIAN RELATIONS WITH AZERBAIJAN AND ARMENIA: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH IN THE CASE OF PRAGMATIST POLITICS

Mehmet Emin ERENDOR
Mehmet Fatih ÖZTARSU
Pages
157–176
Publication Date
2019-03-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main aim of this article is to determine the different aspects of Iranian foreign policy preferences towards Azerbaijan and Armenia in the context of pragmatism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the increase of the importance of the South Caucasus after the collapse of the Soviet Union, regional and global powers have tried to product new policies to have a relationship with the counties of the region.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The regional countries such as Russia, Turkey and Iran have more advantageous than other states but the determination of the policies of these states are different from each other.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main aim of this article is to determine the different aspects of Iranian foreign policy preferences towards Azerbaijan and Armenia in the context of pragmatism.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İran · Azerbaycan · Armenia

Abstract

With the increase of the importance of the South Caucasus after the collapse of the Soviet Union, regional and global powers have tried to product new policies to have a relationship with the counties of the region. The regional countries such as Russia, Turkey and Iran have more advantageous than other states but the determination of the policies of these states are different from each other. For instance, Iran’s approach is based on the pragmatist politics and the country to try to balance its policies in the region in terms of Armenia and Azerbaijan. The main aim of this article is to determine the different aspects of Iranian foreign policy preferences towards Azerbaijan and Armenia in the context of pragmatism.

Özet

With the increase of the importance of the South Caucasus after the collapse of the Soviet Union, regional and global powers have tried to product new policies to have a relationship with the counties of the region. The regional countries such as Russia, Turkey and Iran have more advantageous than other states but the determination of the policies of these states are different from each other. For instance, Iran’s approach is based on the pragmatist politics and the country to try to balance its policies in the region in terms of Armenia and Azerbaijan. The main aim of this article is to determine the different aspects of Iranian foreign policy preferences towards Azerbaijan and Armenia in the context of pragmatism.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERENDOR, M. E., ÖZTARSU, M. F. (2019). IRANIAN RELATIONS WITH AZERBAIJAN AND ARMENIA: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH IN THE CASE OF PRAGMATIST POLITICS. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 157–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/713970

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abilov, S. (2013),
  2. Legal Status of the Caspian, Hazar Strategy Institution. Abushev, K. (2005), The Nagorno Karabakh Conflict As Part of the 'New' Eurasian Geopolitics”, A.Ü. SBF Dergisi, Volume: 60, Number: 3, p. 22. Abrahamyan, E. (2018), Pashinyan Formulates Armenia’s New Iran Strategy, The Jamestown Foundation. Available at: https://jamestown.org/program/pashinyan-formulates armenias-new-iran-strategy/, (Accessed at: 15.10.2018).
  3. Alarabiya (2018), Exporting Iran’s Revolution: A pleasant euphemism for regional chaos, Available at: http://english.alarabiya.net/en/ views/news/middle-east/2018/03/22/-Exporting-Iran-s-Revolution-A-pleasant-euphemism-for-regional-chaos.html, (Accessed at: 01.10.2018).
  4. Amineh, M. P. (1999), Towards the Control of Oil Resources in the Caspian Region. Münster: LIT Verlag Münster. Avdaliani, E. (2017), Israel and the South Caucasus: Building a New Approach, BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 632, Available at: https://besacenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/632-Israel-and-the-South-Caucasus-Avdaliani-final-1.pdf, (Accessed at: 13.10.2018).
  5. Azernews (2018), “Azerbaijan and Other Countries Testing North-South Transport Corridor”. Available at: https://www.azernews.az/ business/131287.html, (Accessed at: 17.09.2018).
  6. Clifton, J. M. and Tiessen, C. (2018), Hiding Your Identity: The Case of Talysh, (Eds.: S. Quakenbush and G. F. Simons), Language and Identity in a Multilingual Migrating World, Victoria: Lean Publishing. Cornell, S. E. (1997), Undeclared War: The Nagorno- Karabakh Conflict Reconsidered, Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. XX, No. 4, p. 13. Council of Foreign Relations (2018),
  7. The Nagorno-Karabakh Problem, Available at: https://www.cfr.org/interactives/global-conflict-tracker#!/conflict/nagorno-karabakh-conflict (Accessed at: 05.10.2018).
  8. Country Studies (2018),
  9. Iran, Available at: http://countrystudies.us/ iran/100.htm, (Accessed at: 03/10/2018)
  10. Djalili, M. R. (2002), Iran and Caucasus: Maintaining Some Pragmatism, Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 1(3): 49-57.
  11. Fuller, E. (2013), Azerbaijan’s Foreign Policy and the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict, IAI Working Papers, Istituto Affari Internazionali, p. 7. Ganeei, H. (2017), Investigating the Role of Creation of Aras Free Zone in the Amount of Social Capitals of Resident Families, International Journal of Philosophy and Social-Psychological Sciences, 3(1), p. 114-122.
  12. Goble, P. (2014), Who is Behind the New Talysh-Language TV Broadcasts in Azerbaijan?,