Bergama İzmir Kentsel Kültür Varlıkları Envanteri 2004

Objective & Hypothesis:After the "site" concept had first been defined on 06.11.1973, in the 1710 numbered Ancient Monuments Law, the archeofogicaf sites and their borders in Bergama were registered by Immovable Ancient Remains and Monuments High Council GEEAYK on 9.7.19763 Just after the decision about the dedaration of Archeological Site; some decisions for the studies that shall define the borders of site and the conditions for construction that shall be valid until the preparation of urban plan for conservation have been made by immovable Ancient Remains and Monuments High Council2 as Bergama city had been built upon the remains of Ancient Pergamon city and also carried the characteristics of "Urban Site " as an old settlement area of our time, in spite of these decisions, "Urban" and "Archeoiogicai Site" borders were registered in 19833 and re-assessed in 1984i .

📊

Key Findings & Data:The building conditions of the transition period that shall be valid until "urban plan for conservation " of the city have been defined on 07.11.2001, 18 years after the declaration of Urban Site, with the declaration of the city as Urban Archeo/ogicaf Site by Izmir District Number 2 Cultural and Natural Heritage Conservation CounciP.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:Site, and 3rd degree Archeologica!

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:2001 Verileri

⚙️Variables:Bergama evleri · çok katmanlı kent geleneksel Türk evi · yarı kârgir

Abstract

After the "site" concept had first been defined on 06.11.1973, in the 1710 numbered Ancient Monuments Law, the archeofogicaf sites and their borders in Bergama were registered by Immovable Ancient Remains and Monuments High Council GEEAYK on 9.7.19763 Just after the decision about the dedaration of Archeological Site; some decisions for the studies that shall define the borders of site and the conditions for construction that shall be valid until the preparation of urban plan for conservation have been made by immovable Ancient Remains and Monuments High Council2 as Bergama city had been built upon the remains of Ancient Pergamon city and also carried the characteristics of "Urban Site " as an old settlement area of our time, in spite of these decisions, "Urban" and "Archeoiogicai Site" borders were registered in 19833 and re-assessed in 1984i . The building conditions of the transition period that shall be valid until "urban plan for conservation " of the city have been defined on 07.11.2001, 18 years after the declaration of Urban Site, with the declaration of the city as Urban Archeo/ogicaf Site by Izmir District Number 2 Cultural and Natural Heritage Conservation CounciP. According to this decision, the sites in Bergama city have been described as Urban Archeohgical Site. 1st degree Archeohgical Site, 2nd degree Archeologica! Site, and 3rd degree Archeologica! Site.

Özet

Ülkemizde "SfT" kavramının ilk kez 06 Ekimi973'te 1710 sayılı Eski Eserier Kanununda tanımlanmasından sonra, 9 Temmuz İ976 tarihinde, Bergama'nın Arkeolojik SIT alanları ve sınırlan Gayrimenkul Eski Eserler ve Anrtlar Yüksek Kuru/unca İGEEAYK lescil edümiştirJ Arkeolojik SİT ifanı kararını takiben Bergama kentinin antik Pergamon kenti kalıntıları üzerine kurulmuş olması, aynı zamanda günümüze air eski bir yerleşim alanı olarak Kentsef S/7 2 . özellikleri taşıması nedeniyle. SfT alanı sınırlarının saptanması ve koruma amaçlı imar planı yapılıncaya kadar geçerli olacak yapılaşma koşullarını belirleyecek çalışmaların yapılması için GEEAYK tarafından kararlar alınmıştır*. Bu kararlara rağmen "Kentsel SfT" ve "Arkeolojik SlT"4 sınırlarının tescili 1983 yılında gerçekleştirilmiş ve 1984 te tekrar değerlendirilmişti

Keywords

Bergama evleri çok katmanlı kent geleneksel Türk evi yarı kârgir yığma faş ahşap karkas dış sofa iç sofa dar saçak.Houses of Bergama multi-layered own traditional Turkish house semi masonry mass stone timber frame outer hali inner half narrow eave

🔖

Cite This Article

Binan, D. U., Kaptı, M., Kıraç, B., Töre, T. (2005). Bergama İzmir Kentsel Kültür Varlıkları Envanteri 2004. TÜBA-KED Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Kültür Envanteri Dergisi, Sayı: 4, 79–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/705596

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...