Journals / Turizm Akademik Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Effects of exceeding social carrying capacity on residents’ support for tourism: The mediating role of community participation and quality of life

Pages
341–355
Publication Date
2022-06-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the research, the perceived SCC overrun of the local people reduces SDT.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to examine how social carrying capacity (SCC) overrun in developing destinations affects support for tourism development (SDT).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were obtained from the local people (N: 423) using stratified sampling, one of the probability-based sampling techniques.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the research, the perceived SCC overrun of the local people reduces SDT.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Social Carrying Capacity · Quality Life · Community Participation

Abstract

This paper aims to examine how social carrying capacity (SCC) overrun in developing destinations affects support for tourism development (SDT). Besides, quality of life (QL) and the mediating role of community participation (CP) in this effect were examined. The basis of this structural relationship is based on the Social Exchange Theory (SET), the Tourist Area Life Cycle Model and the Irridex Model claimed by Doxey. The relationship between the relevant variables was tested by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The research universe is composed of all the local people living in Ürgüp, Goreme, Avanos, Uçhisar and Derinkuyu regions which are the most visited regions of Cappadocia. The data were obtained from the local people (N: 423) using stratified sampling, one of the probability-based sampling techniques. According to the results of the research, the perceived SCC overrun of the local people reduces SDT. Besides, QL and CP mediate the impact of SCC in the development of tourism. This paper contributes to the relevant literature revealing the negative effects of SCC overrun on SDT within the scope of SET.

Özet

This paper aims to examine how social carrying capacity (SCC) overrun in developing destinations affects support for tourism development (SDT). Besides, quality of life (QL) and the mediating role of community participation (CP) in this effect were examined. The basis of this structural relationship is based on the Social Exchange Theory (SET), the Tourist Area Life Cycle Model and the Irridex Model claimed by Doxey. The relationship between the relevant variables was tested by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The research universe is composed of all the local people living in Ürgüp, Goreme, Avanos, Uçhisar and Derinkuyu regions which are the most visited regions of Cappadocia. The data were obtained from the local people (N: 423) using stratified sampling, one of the probability-based sampling techniques. According to the results of the research, the perceived SCC overrun of the local people reduces SDT. Besides, QL and CP mediate the impact of SCC in the development of tourism. This paper contributes to the relevant literature revealing the negative effects of SCC overrun on SDT within the scope of SET.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇ, İ., SEÇİLMİŞ, C. (2022). Effects of exceeding social carrying capacity on residents’ support for tourism: The mediating role of community participation and quality of life. Turizm Akademik Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 341–355. https://ajindex.com/articles/704828

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Agarwal, S. (1997). The resort cycle and seaside tourism: an assessment of its applicability and validity. Tourism management, 18(2), 65-73.
  2. Andereck, K. L., & Nyaupane, G. P. (2011). Exploring the nature of tourism and quality of life perceptions among residents. Journal of Travel research, 50(3), 248-260.
  3. Andereck, K. L., & Vogt, C. A. (2000). The relationship between residents’ attitudes toward tourism and tourism development options. Journal of Travel research, 39(1), 27-36.
  4. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411. Ap, J. (1992). Residents' perceptions on tourism impacts. Annals of tourism Research, 19(4), 665-690.
  5. Aref, F. (2011). The effects of tourism on quality of life: A case study of Shiraz, Iran. Life Science Journal, 8(2), 26-30.
  6. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 35(4), 216-224.
  7. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
  8. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. Boley, B. B., & Strzelecka, M. (2016). Towards a universal measure of" Support for Tourism". Annals of Tourism Research, 61, 238-241.
  9. Bolzoni, M. (2013). What tourists ignore Ambivalences, conflicts and compromises in a changing neighbourhood. In RC21 Conference. Brislin, R. W. (1976). Comparative research methodology: Cross-cultural studies. International journal of psychology, 11(3), 215-229.
  10. Butler, R. W. (1980). The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution: implications for management of resources. Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 24(1), 5-12.
  11. Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge. Chang, H. M., Hung, C. H., & Huang, Y. C. (2019). The Mediating Effect of Quality of Life on Tourism Impact and Support Attitude in Alishan Tribes. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(12), 857. Chen, C. L., & Teng, N. (2016). Management priorities and carrying capacity at a high-use beach from tourists’ perspectives: A way towards sustainable beach tourism. Marine Policy, 74, 213-219.
  12. Cheng, T. M., Wu, H. C., Wang, J. T. M., & Wu, M. R. (20