SavedAdd your journal

Journals / SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

PERCEPTION OF LEADERSHIP POWER OF COACHES AND ATHLETES ACCORDING TO THEIR GENDER

ANTRENÖRLERİN VE SPORCULARIN CİNSİYETLERİNE GÖRE LİDERLİK GÜCÜ ALGILARI

Erkut KONTER
Pages
85–90
Publication Date
2007-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that male coaches have higher legitimate power and referent power than female coaches

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to analyze the perception of leadership power of coaches and athletes according to their gender.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected from athletes (n=587) and coaches (n=91) in a number of different team and individual sports (football, basketball, volleyball, handball, athletics, tennis, table tennis, fencing, Judo, archery and wrestling) including amateur and professional participants.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that male coaches have higher legitimate power and referent power than female coaches
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Liderlik Gücü · Algılama · Antrenörlük

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the perception of leadership power of coaches and athletes according to their gender. Adapted Turkish version of Power in Sport Questionnaire-Other (PSQ-O for athletes), Power in Sport Questionnaire-Self (PSQS for coaches) and a questionnaire related to demographic variables were used in this study. Data were collected from athletes (n=587) and coaches (n=91) in a number of different team and individual sports (football, basketball, volleyball, handball, athletics, tennis, table tennis, fencing, Judo, archery and wrestling) including amateur and professional participants. T-test Analysis of PSQ-O data revealed the only significant differences between male and female athletes with regard to expert power (t(585)=3.21, p<0.01). Results of the analysis showed that female athletes have higher perception of expert power than male athletes. Analysis of PSQ-S using Mann Whithney U Test revealed the significant difference between female and male coaches related to legitimate power (U=100.00, p<0.04) and referent power (U=93.00, p<0.03) except coercive and expert powers (p>0.05). Results indicated that male coaches have higher legitimate power and referent power than female coaches

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı; antrenörlerin ve sporcuların cinsiyetlerine göre liderlik gücü algılarını araştırmaktır. Bu çalışmada; Sporda Liderlik Gücü Ölçeği-Diğer (SLGÖ-D: Sporcu Formu), Sporda Liderlik Gücü Ölçeği-Kendi (SLGÖ-K: Antrenör Formu) ve hazırlanan anket sorularından yararlanılmıştır. Veriler; takım sporları (futbol, voleybol, basketbol, hentbol) ve bireysel sporlarla (atletizm, eskrim, tenis, masa tenisi, okçuluk, judo, güreş) ilgilenen amatör ve profesyonel toplam 587 sporcu ile 91 antrenörden toplanmıştır. SLGÖ-D’nin t-testi analizleri; sporcuların cinsiyetlerine göre zorlayıcılık, yasal ve özdeşleşim gücü algılarında anlamlı bir farklılığı göstermezken (p>0.05), uzmanlık gücünde anlamlı bir farklılık ortaya koymuştur (t(585) = -3.49, p<0.01). Araştırma sonuçları, bayan sporcuların erkek sporculardan daha yüksek uzmanlık gücü algısını göstermiştir. SLGÖ-K’nin Mann Whithney U Testi analizlerinde ise; antrenörlerin cinsiyetlerine göre zorlayıcılık ve uzmanlık gücü algılarında, anlamlı bir farklılığı göstermezken (p>0.05) yasal güç ve özdeşleşim gücü algılarında anlamlı farklılıkları ortaya koymuştur (yasal güçte: U=100.00, p<0.04 ve özdeşleşim gücünde: U=93.00, p<0.03). Araştırma sonuçları, erkek antrenörlerin bayan antrenörlerden daha yüksek yasal güç ve özdeşleşim gücü algısını göstermiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

KONTER, E. (2007). PERCEPTION OF LEADERSHIP POWER OF COACHES AND ATHLETES ACCORDING TO THEIR GENDER. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 85–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/700934

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Chelladurai., p., “Leadership in sports: A review. International Journal of Sport Psychology”, 21, 328-354, 1990.
  2. Wann, D. L., Metcalf, L. A., Brewer, K. R., Whiteside, H. D., “Development of the Power in Sport Questionnaires”, Journal of Sport Behavior, 23, 423-443, 2000.
  3. French, J., Raven, B. H., The bases of social power. In. D. Cartwright, (Ed.). Studies in social power (pp.150-167).Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, Michigan, 1959.
  4. Chelladurai, P., “Discrepancy between preference and perception of leadership behavior and satisfaction of athletes in varying sports”, Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 27-41, 1984.
  5. Kelman, H. C., “Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three process of attitude change”’, Journal of Conflict Revolution, 2, 51-60, 1958.
  6. Slack, T.S., Understanding Sport Organizations, The Application of Organization Theory. Human Kinetics, IIIinois, 1997.
  7. Yukl, G., Falbe, C. M., “Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 416-423, 1991. 8. Budak., Etaugh, C. A. Bridges, J. S., The Psychology of Women, A lifespan Perspective. Allyn and Bacon: Boston, 2001.
  8. Eccles, J. S. Harold, R. D., “Gender differences in sport involvement: Applying Eccles’Expectancy-Value Model”, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 3, 7-35, 1991.
  9. Ecles, J. S., “Gender Roles and Women’s Achievement Related Decisions”, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135-172, 1987.
  10. Eccles, J. S., Sex Differences in Sex Patterns. In. T. Sonderegger (Ed.). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Psychology of Gender (pp. 97-132),
  11. University of Nebraska Pres, Lincoln, 1985.
  12. Bem, S., “The measurement of psychological androgyny”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162, 1974.
  13. Burton, D., Goal Setting In Sport, Singer, R., Murphy, M., Tennant, K. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology, Mcmillian Publishing Company, 486-488, New York, 1993.
  14. Yukl, G., Leadership in organizations, Fifth Edition,
  15. Prantice Hall, New Jersey, 2002.
  16. Powell, G. N., “One More Time: Do Female and Male Managers Differ?”, Academy of Management Executive, 4, 68-75, 1990.
  17. Weinberg, R., Gould, D., Foundations of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Human Kinetics, IIIinois, 1995.
  18. Coakley, J., Sport in Society: Issues and Controversies. 5th Edition, Times Mirror/Mosby College, St. Loise, 1997.
  19. Gill, D. L., Psychological Dynamics of Exercise and Sport. Second Edition,
  20. Human Kinetics, IIIinois, 2000.
  21. Gill, D. L. Deeter, T. E., “Deve