SavedAdd your journal

Journals / SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3

Physical Education Teachers’ Experiences of Pedagogical Decision-Making

Eğitimi Öğretmenlerinin Pedagojik Karar Verme Deneyimleri

Damla Güler(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-9907-1065
Yağmur Güler(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-8883-6504
Pages
860–869
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the findings show that pedagogical decision-making in physical education involves responding to students, considering social and value-related priorities, and adapting teaching to the conditions in which lessons take place.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to explore physical education teachers’ perspectives on the factors that shape their pedagogical decision-making in everyday teaching contexts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study used a basic qualitative research design and included nine physical education teachers working in middle and high schools in different provinces of Türkiye.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, the findings show that pedagogical decision-making in physical education involves responding to students, considering social and value-related priorities, and adapting teaching to the conditions in which lessons take place.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Beden eğitimi · pedagojik karar verme · öğretmen bakış açıları

Abstract

This study aimed to explore physical education teachers’ perspectives on the factors that shape their pedagogical decision-making in everyday teaching contexts. The study used a basic qualitative research design and included nine physical education teachers working in middle and high schools in different provinces of Türkiye. Data were collected through semi-structured individual interviews and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Three main themes were identified: students’ affective responses, values and social relationships, and contextual conditions. Teachers described students’ enjoyment, motivation, and willingness to participate as important cues when evaluating how lessons were progressing and whether activities needed to be adapted. Their decisions also reflected the importance they placed on communication, cooperation, fair play, and social relationships among students. Physical space, available equipment, class size, student profiles, and environmental conditions influenced teachers’ choices of activities and teaching methods. Teachers adapted their lessons in response to these conditions while trying to maintain their intended learning goals. Overall, the findings show that pedagogical decision-making in physical education involves responding to students, considering social and value-related priorities, and adapting teaching to the conditions in which lessons take place.

Özet

Bu çalışma, beden eğitimi öğretmenlerinin günlük öğretim süreçlerindeki pedagojik karar verme süreçlerini şekillendiren faktörlere ilişkin bakış açılarını incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Çalışmada temel nitel araştırma deseni kullanılmış ve Türkiye'nin farklı illerindeki ortaokul ve liselerde görev yapan dokuz beden eğitimi öğretmeni araştırmaya dahil edilmiştir. Veriler, yarı yapılandırılmış bireysel görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmış ve refleksif tematik analiz yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada üç ana tema belirlenmiştir: öğrencilerin duyuşsal tepkileri, değerler ve sosyal ilişkiler ile bağlamsal koşullar. Öğretmenler; dersin gidişatını değerlendirirken ve etkinliklerin uyarlanması gerekip gerekmediğine karar verirken, öğrencilerin keyif alma, motivasyon ve katılıma istekli olma durumlarını önemli ipuçları olarak tanımlamışlardır. Öğretmenlerin kararları ayrıca; iletişim, iş birliği, centilmenlik (fair play) ve öğrenciler arası sosyal ilişkilere verdikleri önemi de yansıtmıştır. Fiziksel mekan, mevcut ekipman, sınıf mevcudu, öğrenci profilleri ve çevresel koşullar; öğretmenlerin etkinlik ve öğretim yöntemi tercihlerini etkilemiştir. Öğretmenler, hedeflenen öğrenme amaçlarını korumaya çalışırken bu koşullara yanıt olarak derslerinde uyarlamalar yapmışlardır. Genel olarak bulgular, beden eğitiminde pedagojik karar verme sürecinin; öğrencilere yanıt vermeyi, sosyal ve değerlere dayalı öncelikleri göz önünde bulundurmayı ve öğretimi dersin gerçekleştiği koşullara göre uyarlamayı içerdiğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Güler, D., Güler, Y. (2026). Physical Education Teachers’ Experiences of Pedagogical Decision-Making. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3, 860–869. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.1897404

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Anwar, M. H., Jatmika, H. M., & Setiawan, C. (2025). “Don’t Forget the Whistle”: Novice Physical Education Teachers’ Reflections on Their Beliefs, Teaching Practices, and Identities. Education Sciences, 15(1), 88.
  2. Beni, S., Fletcher, T., & Ní Chróinín, D. (2017). Meaningful experiences in physical education and youth sport: A review of the literature. Quest, 69(3), 291-312.
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  5. Borko, H., Roberts, S. A., & Shavelson, R. J. (2008). Teachers’ decision making: From Alan J. Bishop to today. In P. Clarkson & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Critical issues in mathematics education: Major contributions of Alan Bishop (pp. 37–67). Springer
  6. Demirhan, G., Bulca, Y., Altay, F., Şahin, R., Güvenç, A., Aslan, A., Güven, B., Kangalgil, M., Hünük, D., & Koca, C. (2008). Comparıson of the vıews of partners regardıng the physıcal educatıon currıculum and ıt’s delıvery. Hacettepe J. of Sport Sciences 19(3), 157-180.
  7. Eisenhart, M. A., Shrum, J. L., Harding, J. R., & Cuthbert, A. M. (1988). Teacher beliefs: Definitions, findings, and directions. Educational policy, 2(1), 51-70.
  8. Harvey, S., Pill, S., Hastie, P., & Wallhead, T. (2020). Physical education teachers’ perceptions of the successes, constraints, and possibilities associated with implementing the sport education model. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 25(5), 555-566.
  9. Hellison, D. (2011). Teaching physical and social responsibility through physical activity. Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics.
  10. Lindkvist, L. (2023). Logics in play: what ‘rules of the game’ regulate Swedish PE teachers’ decision-making processes? Sport, Education and Society, 28(7), 842–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2022.2071254
  11. Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
  12. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  13. Morgan, P. J., & Hansen, V. (2008). Classroom teachers' perceptions of the impact of barriers to teaching physical education on the quality of physical education programs. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 79(4), 506-516.
  14. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of educational research, 62(3), 307-332. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
  15. Sakallı, D., & Kerkez, F. İ. (2023). Examination of Pre-Service Physical Education Teachers' Beliefs on Physical Education Profession. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 25(3), 414-422.
  16. Sarigül, V., Karakaya, Y. E., Ince, U., & Yalçin, C. (2021). The Relationship between the Teaching Goal Orientations and Teaching Approach of Physical Education and Sports Teachers. Journal of Educational Issues, 7(1), 201-215.
  17. Škėrienė, S., & Augustinienė, A. (2018). The theoretical framework of factors influencing the pedagogical decision-making. Pedagogika, 131(3), 5-25.
  18. Syrmpas, I., Digelidis, N., Watt, A., & Vicars, M. (2017). Physical education teachers' experiences and beliefs of production and reproduction teaching approaches. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 184-194.
  19. Tabak, E. Y., Dalkılıç, M., Devrilmez, E., & Dervent, F. (2023). A review study of physical education pedagogy in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 25(1), 137-146.
  20. Wei, Y. (2025). A study on the influence of physical education teachers’ teaching beliefs and attributions of teaching success and failure on their effective teaching behaviors. PLoS One, 20(4), e0321137.