SavedAdd your journal

Journals / SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY OF PROFESSIONAL SELF EFFICACY SCALE FOR VOLLEYBALL COACH

VOLEYBOL ANTRENÖRÜ MESLEKİ ÖZ YETERLİK ÖLÇEĞİ GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Çalık Veli KOÇAK
Özbay GÜVEN
Pages
162–177
Publication Date
2018-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result; It is determined that the scale that develops to measure the professional self-efficacy of the volleyball coaches as a result of the validity and reliability study is a usable measurement tool

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to develop a measurement tool with psychometric properties that will measure the professional self-efficacy of the volleyball coaches.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There were 174 men (78,7%) and 47 women (21,3%) who were active coaches in different stages of the research (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 levels) 221 volleyball coaches participated voluntarily.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result; It is determined that the scale that develops to measure the professional self-efficacy of the volleyball coaches as a result of the validity and reliability study is a usable measurement tool
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Antrenör · Öz Yeterlik · Voleybol

Abstract

The aim of this research is to develop a measurement tool with psychometric properties that will measure the professional self-efficacy of the volleyball coaches. There were 174 men (78,7%) and 47 women (21,3%) who were active coaches in different stages of the research (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 levels) 221 volleyball coaches participated voluntarily. In the analysis of the data, item total test correlation, KMO and Barlett Sphericity test, confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis were used. After the analyzes made, it was determined that the scale had a structure of 29 items and 5 sub-dimensions (Motivation Efficacy, Technical Teaching Efficacy, Personality Building Efficacy, Leadership and Team Management Efficacy, Condition and Tactic Efficacy). The load values of the items range from .452 to .850. Confirmatory factor analysis (DFA) results were χ2 / sd = 1.88, RMSEA = 0.064, RMR = 0.037, NFI = 0.96, NNFI = 0.98, CFI = 0.98, GFI = 0.91 and AGFI = 0.88. In order to test the reliability level of the scale, Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient were calculated .891. As a result; It is determined that the scale that develops to measure the professional self-efficacy of the volleyball coaches as a result of the validity and reliability study is a usable measurement tool

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı voleybol antrenörlerinin mesleki öz yeterliklerini ölçebilecek psikometrik özelliklere sahip bir ölçme aracı geliştirmektir. Araştırmaya Türkiye’de farklı kademelerde (1. 2. 3. 4. ve 5. kademe) faal olarak antrenörlük yapan 174’ü erkek (% 78,7), 47’si kadın (% 21,3) olmak üzere 221 voleybol antrenörü gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde madde toplam test korelasyonu, KMO ve Barlett Sphericity testi, açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonrasında ölçeğin 29 madde ve 5 alt boyutlu (Motivasyon Yeterliği, Teknik Öğretim Yeterliği, Kişilik Kazandırma Yeterliği, Liderlik-Takım Yönetimi Yeterliği, Kondisyon-Taktik Yeterliği) bir yapıya sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Maddelerin yük değerleri .452 ile .850 arasında değişmektedir. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) sonuçları χ2/ sd=1.88, RMSEA=0.064, RMR=0.037, NFI=0.96, NNFI=0.98, CFI=0.98, GFI=0.91 ve AGFI=0.88 olarak bulunmuştur. Ölçeğin güvenirlik seviyesini test etmek için ise Cronbach’s Alpha güvenirlik katsayısı .891 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Sonuç olarak; yapılan geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması sonucunda voleybol antrenörlerinin mesleki öz yeterliklerini ölçmek amacıyla geliştiren Voleybol Antrenörü Mesleki Öz Yeterlik Ölçeğinin (VAMYÖ) kullanılabilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu belirlenmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

KOÇAK, Ç. V., GÜVEN, Ö. (2018). THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY OF PROFESSIONAL SELF EFFICACY SCALE FOR VOLLEYBALL COACH. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 162–177. https://ajindex.com/articles/700671

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Amman T, İkizler HC, Karagözoğlu C (2000): Sporda sosyal bilimler. Ankara:
  2. Alfa. Ashton PT (1985): Motivation and teacher's sense of efficacy. In C. Ames ve R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 2. The classroom milieu (141-174).
  3. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  4. Bandura A (1977): Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  5. Bandura A (1982): Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
  6. Bandura A (1986): Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Bandura A (1997): Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman. Bandura A (2001): Social cognitive theory: an angetic perspective. Annual Reviev of Psychology. 54(1), 1-26.
  7. Bandura A (2005): Evolution of social cognitive theory. In K. G. Smith ve M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management (9-35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Baker A (2008): The influence of coaching efficacy on team cohesion and performance. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, University of Windsor. Ontario. Brown EW (Ed.). (1992): Youth soccer: A complete handbook. Dubuque, LA: Brown ve Benchmark. Byrne BM, Campbell LT (1999): Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(5), 555–574.
  9. Başer E (1998): Uygulamalı spor psikolojisi. Ankara.
  10. Bağırgan. Büyüköztürk Ş (2011), Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:
  11. Pegem. Caprara GV, Barbaranellı C, Steca P, Malone PS (2006): Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: a study at the school level. Journal Of School Psychology, 44, 473-490.
  12. Chelladurai P (1980): Leadership in sport organizations. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 5, 226-231.
  13. Coladarci T (1992): Teachers' sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 323-337.
  14. Cole DA (1987): Methodological contributions to clinical research, utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(4), 584-594.
  15. Coşkun E, Özer B, Tiryaki EN (2010): Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının özel alan yeterlik algılarının değerlendirilmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 123-136.
  16. Çokluk O, Şekercioğlu G, Büyüköztürk Ş (2010): Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve Lis