SavedAdd your journal

Journals / MANTAR DERGİSİ / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Single name nomenclature of fungi and its some reflections since 2011 especially in Turkey

Fungusların tek isimle isimlendirilmesi ve 2011’den bu yana özellikle Türkiye’deki yansımaları

Ahmet ASAN
Gülay GİRAY
Rasime DEMİREL
Halide AYDOĞDU
Pages
50–59
Publication Date
2019-12-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is seen that the old name of some species whose name is changed is still used in many publications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Despite some opposing mycologists in the fungal systematics, dual nomenclature (meaning that a perfect i.e. sexually reproducing fungal species different name, the same species as an imperfect i.e. that fungus has asexual reproduction different name given) was quitted along with publishing “The Amsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature”.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Developments related to the subject since 2011 and the effects of the single fungal taxonomic system are discussed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is seen that the old name of some species whose name is changed is still used in many publications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Fungal taksonomi · Tek isimle isimlendirme · bir fungus bir isim

Abstract

Despite some opposing mycologists in the fungal systematics, dual nomenclature (meaning that a perfect i.e. sexually reproducing fungal species different name, the same species as an imperfect i.e. that fungus has asexual reproduction different name given) was quitted along with publishing “The Amsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature”. Developments related to the subject since 2011 and the effects of the single fungal taxonomic system are discussed. Full implementation of the single name nomenclature system may take a long time. It is difficult to abandon the fungal names in the publications before 2013, and these sources are still used in all over the world. Change can take place over time. It is seen that the old name of some species whose name is changed is still used in many publications.

Özet

Mantar sistematiğindeki bazı muhalif mikologlara rağmen, çift isimlendirme (yani; eşeyli üreme gösteren fungus türlerinin farklı, eşeysiz üreyen aynı fungusun farklı tür adı alması) uzun zaman önce “Amsterdam Deklarasyonu - Fungal İsimlendirme” makalesi ile yayınlanmıştır. 2011'den bu yana konuyla ilgili gelişmeler ve tek fungal taksonomik sistemin etkileri tartışılmaktadır. Tek isim isimlendirme sisteminin tam olarak uygulanması uzun zaman alabilir. 2013'ten önce yayınlardaki mantar isimlerini terk etmek zor olmakla birlikte bu kaynaklar hala tüm dünyada kullanılıyor. Değişim zamanla gerçekleştirilebilecektir. Adı değiştirilmiş bazı türlerin eski isimlerinin hala birçok yayında kullanıldığı görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASAN, A., GİRAY, G., DEMİREL, R., AYDOĞDU, H. (2019). Single name nomenclature of fungi and its some reflections since 2011 especially in Turkey. MANTAR DERGİSİ, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 50–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/687669

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ainsworth, G. C. (2009). Introduction to the History of Mycology. 359 pp. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge-UK. First publ: 1976; digital ed. version. Aylward, J. (2014). Diversity and dispersal of the ophiostomatoid fungus, Knoxdaviesia proteae, within Protea repens infructescences. YL Tezi-MSc Thesis. 95 pp. Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za. Link:. (Access: April 21, 2014). lackwel, l. M. and Spatafora J.W. (2004). Fungi and their allies. pp 7-21. Eds.: Mueller GM, Bills GF, Foster MS. Biodiversity of Fungi: Inventory and Monitoring Methods. 777 pp. Elsevier Academic Press.
  2. Amsterdam. Blackwell, M. (2011). The Fungi: 1, 2, 3. 5.1 million species? Amer J Bot 98: 426-438.
  3. Crous, P.W., Giraldo, A., Hawksworth, D.L., Robert, V., Kirk, P.M., Guarro, J., Robbertse, B., Schoch, C.L., Damm, U., Trakunyingcharoen, T. & Groenewald, J.Z. (2014). The Genera of Fungi: fixing the application of type species of generic names. Ima Fungus 5: 141-160.
  4. Demirel, R. (2016). Comparison of rDNA regions ITS LSU and SSU of some Aspergillus, Penicillium and Talaromyces spp. Turk J Bot 40: 576-583.
  5. Gams, W., Jaklitsch, W. (and signatured by 77 researchers). (2011). Fungal nomenclature 3. A critical response to the “Amsterdam Declaration”. Mycotaxon 116: 501-512.
  6. Gams, W. (2013). A new nomenclature for fungi. Mycol. Iranica 1: 7-13, 2013.
  7. Garza, J.R.C., Miranda, R.S.C., Garza, A.M.C., Texis, A.P.E., Díaz, E.G. & Juárez, U.S. (2018). Peritonitis due to Geotrichum candidum in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Case Rep In Clin Med 7: 232-240.
  8. Geiser, D.M., Aoki, T., Bacon, C.W., Baker, S.E., Bhattacharyya, M.K., Brandt, M.E., Brown, D.W., Burgess, L.W., Chulze, S., Coleman, J.J., Correll, J.C., Covert, S.F., Crous, P.W., Cuomo, C.A., De Hoog, G.S., Di Pietro, A., Elmer, W.H., Epstein, L., Frandsen, R.J., Freeman, S., Gagkaeva, T., Glenn, A.E., Gordon, T.R., Gregory, N.F., Hammond-Kosack, K.E., Hanson, L.E., Jímenez-Gasco Mdel, M., Kang, S., Kistler, H.C., Kuldau, G.A., Leslie, J.F., Logrieco, A., Lu, G., Lysøe, E., Ma, L.J., McCormick, S.P., Migheli, Q., Moretti, A., Munaut, F., O'Donnell, K., Pfenning, L., Ploetz, R.C., Proctor, R.H., Rehner, S.A., Robert, V.A., Rooney, A.P., Bin Salleh, B., Scandiani, M.M., Scauflaire, J., Short, D.P., Steenkamp, E., Suga, H., Summerell, B.A., Sutton, D.A., Thrane, U., Trail, F., Van Diepeningen, A., Vanetten, H.D., Viljoen, A., Waalwijk, C., Ward, T.J., Wingfield, M.J., Xu, J.R., Yang, X.B., Yli-Mattila, T., Zhang,