Journals / Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Pain Behaviors in Patients under Mechanical Ventilatory Support During Intravascular Interventions

Mekanik Ventilatör Desteğindeki Hastaların İntravasküler Girişimler Sırasındaki Ağrı Davranışları

Pages
138–144
Publication Date
2020-06-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that 98.6% of the patients were connected to the mechanical ventilation, 87.1% was applied sedation, RSS of the patients was 2.93±1.12, and 57.1% were awake.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the behavioral and physiological responses of the patients with intubated or tracheostomy and mild sedated patients who were hospitalized in the 2nd and 3rd level intensive care unit (ICU) to the pain experiences experienced during intravascular intervention (arterial, central and peripheral).Methods: In this descriptive and cross-sectional study were included 70 patients who were hospitalized in anesthesia ICU of Training and Research Hospital in the western of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon signed rank were used to analyze the data.Results: The mean age of the patients included in the study was 64.53±13.54 years, and 55.7% of the patients were in the 65 and over age group and 54.3% were male patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that 98.6% of the patients were connected to the mechanical ventilation, 87.1% was applied sedation, RSS of the patients was 2.93±1.12, and 57.1% were awake.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yoğun bakım ünitesi · mekanik ventilatör · intravasküler girişimler

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the behavioral and physiological responses of the patients with intubated or tracheostomy and mild sedated patients who were hospitalized in the 2nd and 3rd level intensive care unit (ICU) to the pain experiences experienced during intravascular intervention (arterial, central and peripheral).Methods: In this descriptive and cross-sectional study were included 70 patients who were hospitalized in anesthesia ICU of Training and Research Hospital in the western of Turkey. The data were collected by using the personal information form, the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS), the Ramsey Sedation Scale (RSS) and the Physiological Pain Indicators Form. Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon signed rank were used to analyze the data.Results: The mean age of the patients included in the study was 64.53±13.54 years, and 55.7% of the patients were in the 65 and over age group and 54.3% were male patients. It was found that 98.6% of the patients were connected to the mechanical ventilation, 87.1% was applied sedation, RSS of the patients was 2.93±1.12, and 57.1% were awake. It was observed that the BPS scores, MAP, pulse and respiration values were raised during intravasculer interventions.Conclusion: As a result of the research; it was found that the patients experienced different levels of pain during intravascular interventions and this pain increased the physiological parameters (MAP, pulse, and respiratory). Patients in ICU should be evaluated for pain while performing intravascular interventions and effective pain management should be performed.

Özet

Amaç: Araştırma 2. ve 3. basamak yoğun bakım ünitesinde yatan, mekanik ventilatore bağlı entübe ya da trakeostomili ve hafif düzeyde sedatize hastaların intravasküler girişimler (arteriyel, santral ve periferik) sırasında yaşadığı ağrı deneyimlerine yönelik davranışsal ve fizyolojik tepkilerini belirlemek amacı ile yapıldı.Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel tipteki bu araştırmaya Türkiye’nin batı bölgesindeki bir Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Anestezi Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde yatan 70 hasta alındı. Veriler kişisel bilgi formu, Davranışsal Ağrı Ölçeği (DAÖ), Ramsey Sedasyon Ölçeği (RSÖ) ve fizyolojik ağrı göstergeleri formu kullanılarak toplandı. Verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistikler ve Wilcoxon işaretli sıra testi kullanıldı.Bulgular: Araştırma kapsamında alınan hastaların yaş ortalaması 64,53±13,54 yıl, %55,7’si 65 ve üzeri yaş grubunda ve %54,3’ünün erkek hastalardan oluştuğu saptandı. Hastaların %98,6’sının mekanik ventilatöre bağlı olduğu, %87,1’ine sedasyon uygulandığı, RSÖ ortalamasının 2,93±1,12 ve %57,1’inin uyanık olduğu belirlendi. Hastaların intravasküler girişimler sırasında işlem öncesine göre DAÖ puanlarının, ortalama arter basıncı (OAB), nabız ve solunum değerlerinin arttığı gözlendi.Sonuç: Araştırma sonucunda; hastaların intravasküler girişimler sırasında farklı düzeylerde ağrı yaşadığı ve bu ağrının fizyololojik parametre (OAB, solunum ve nabız) değerlerini arttırdığı saptandı. Yoğun bakım ünitesinde yatan hastaların intravasküler girişimler sırasında ağrıları değerlendirilmeli ve etkili ağrı yönetimi yapılmalıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ADA, M., YILMAZ, E. (2020). Pain Behaviors in Patients under Mechanical Ventilatory Support During Intravascular Interventions. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 138–144. https://ajindex.com/articles/685971

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Chanques G, Pohlman A, Kress JP, et al. Psychometric comparison of three behavioural scales for the assessment of pain in critically ill patients unable to self-report. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):R160. doi:10.1186/cc14000 Erden S. Yoğun bakımda ağrı yönetiminde hemşirenin anahtar rolleri. Van Tıp Dergisi. 2015;22(4):332-336. Çelik S. Yoğun bakım hastalarında ağrı yönetimi. Yoğun Bakım Hemşireliği Dergisi. 2016;20(1):1-8.
  2. Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the ıntensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):263-306. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72 Wøien H, Vaerøy H, Aamodt G, Bjørk IT. Improving the systematic approach to pain and sedation management in the ICU by using assessment tools. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(11-12):1552-1561. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04309.x Demir Y. Yoğun bakım ünitesinde ağrı deneyimi ve ağrının değerlendirilmesi: literatür incelemesi. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2012;2(1):24-30. Ayasrah S. Care-related pain in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016;44(4):458-465. doi:10.1177/0310057X1604400412 Puntillo KA, Max A, Timsit JF, et al. Determinants of procedural pain ıntensity in the ıntensive care unit. The Europain® Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(1):39-47. doi:10.1164/rccm.201306-1174OC Rose L, Haslam L, Dale C, et al. Survey of assessment and management of pain for critically III adults. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2011;27(39):121-128. doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2011.02.001 Keane KM. Validity and reliability of the critical care pain observation tool: a replication study. Pain Manag Nurs. 2013;14(4):e216-e225. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2012.01.002 Olsen BF, Rustøen T, Sandvik L, Miaskowski C, Jacobsen M, Valeberg BT. Implementation of a pain management algorithm in intensive care units and evaluation of nurses' level of adherence with the algorithm. Heart Lung. 2015;44(6):528-533. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.08.001 Al Sutari MM, Abdalrahim MS, Hamdan-Mansour AM, Ayasrah SM. Pain among mechanically ventilated patients in critical care units. J Res Med Sci. 2014;19(8):726-732.
  3. Arroyo-Novoa CM, Figueroa-Ramos MI, Puntillo KA, et al. Pain related to tracheal suctioning in awake acutely and critically ill adults: a descriptive study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2008;24(1):20-27. doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2007.05.002 Eti Aslan F, Karadağ Arlı Ş, Yavuz M, et al. Yoğun bakımdaki sedatize hastaları