Journals / Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama / 2014 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

-

Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Ortamlarında Kullanılan Farklı Etkileşim Araçlarının Öğrencilerin Başarılarına ve Sosyal Bulunuşluk Algılarına Etkisi

Pages
56–76
Publication Date
2014-10-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall objective of this study with which the single-factor intergroup experimental pattern was used is to introduce the effects of different interaction tools utilized in online learning environments on academic achievements and social presence perceptions of students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The overall objective of this study with which the single-factor intergroup experimental pattern was used is to introduce the effects of different interaction tools utilized in online learning environments on academic achievements and social presence perceptions of students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was conducted with the contributions of 57 students from the Ahi Evran University, Faculty of Education, Elementary Science Education Department in the 2008-2009 Spring term.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the findings obtained using one-way-ANOVA, the social presence perceptions and achievements of the students did not vary meaningfully with respect to the learning environment they used
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008-2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:sosyal bulunuşluk · çevrimiçi öğrenme · sürece dayalı değerlendirme

Abstract

The overall objective of this study with which the single-factor intergroup experimental pattern was used is to introduce the effects of different interaction tools utilized in online learning environments on academic achievements and social presence perceptions of students. The research was conducted with the contributions of 57 students from the Ahi Evran University, Faculty of Education, Elementary Science Education Department in the 2008-2009 Spring term. To be used in the experimental process of the research, two online learning environments whose unique difference was the different interaction tools used were designed. To provide the interaction in one of the environments, ‘Within-group Blog’, ‘Inter-group Blog’, and ‘Chat’ tools were used and in the other, ‘Messaging’, ‘Forum’ and ‘Chat’ tools were utilized. For determination of the achievements of the students, data in the assessment module integrated to the learning material and the works of the students in the learning environments were used. In addition, at the end of the experimental process a posttest, which is the same with the pretest, was conducted to determine the achievements of the students. For determination of the social presence perceptions of the students, a scale of social presence perception, whose validity and reliability were proved, was used. According to the findings obtained using one-way-ANOVA, the social presence perceptions and achievements of the students did not vary meaningfully with respect to the learning environment they used

Özet

Tek faktörlü gruplar arası deneysel desenin kullanıldığı bu araştırmanın genel amacı, çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarında kullanılan farklı etkileşim araçlarının öğrencilerin başarılarına ve sosyal bulunuşluk algılarına etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Araştırma lisans düzeyindeki 57 öğrencinin katılımlarıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın deneysel işlem sürecinde kullanılmak üzere, aralarındaki tek farkın kullanılan farklı etkileşim araçları olduğu iki çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamı tasarlanmıştır. Ortamlardan birinde etkileşimi sağlamak için ‘Grup İçi Blog’, ‘Gruplar Arası Blog’ ve ‘Sohbet’ araçları kullanılmışken, diğerinde ise ‘Mesajlaşma’, ‘Forum’ ve ‘Sohbet’ araçları kullanılmıştır. Öğrencilerin başarılarının belirlenmesinde öğrenme materyaline entegre edilen değerlendirme modülündeki verilerden ve öğrencilerin öğrenme ortamlarındaki çalışmalarından yararlanılmıştır. Ayrıca deneysel işlemin sonunda uygulanan son test de öğrencilerin başarılarının belirlenmesinde kullanılmıştır. Öğrencilerin sosyal bulunuşluk algılarının belirlenmesinde ise geçerliliği ve güvenilirliği kanıtlanmış olan bir sosyal bulunuşluk ölçeği kullanılmıştır. İlişkisiz örneklemler için tek faktörlü varyans analizi (one way ANOVA) kullanılarak elde edilen bulgulara göre; öğrencilerin başarıları ve sosyal bulunuşluk algıları kullandıkları öğrenme ortamına göre anlamlı bir fark göstermemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Olpak, Y., ÇAKMAK, E. K. (2014). -. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 56–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/67970

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abrami, P. Bernard, M., Lou, Y. Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P., Fiset, M., and Euang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439.
  2. Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., and Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83–97.
  3. Allen, E., and Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States 2010.
  4. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Aragon, S. R. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100(3). Bibeau, S. (2001). Social presence, isolation, and connectedness in online teaching and learning: From the literature to real life. Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, 15(3), 35-39.
  5. Cavanaugh, C., Gillan, K., Kromey, J. Hess, M., and Blomeyer, R. (2004). The effects of distance education on K-12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Conceição, S. C., & Schmidt, S. W. (2010). How non-content related forums influence social presence in the online learning environment. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 19(2), 73–85.
  6. Çağıltay, K., Graham, C. R., Lim, B., and Craner, J. (2001). The seven principles of good practice: A practical approach to evaluating online courses. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20. Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Jl. of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), 147-166.
  7. Gunawardena, C. N. (2002). Social presence and the sociocultural context of online education. In Symposium on Open/Distance Education: New Horizons in Educational Communications and Technology. Eskisehir, Turkey. Gülbahar, Y. (2009). E-öğrenme. Pegem Akademi. ISBN 978-605-4282-09-8.
  8. Kang, M., Choi, H., and Park, S. (2007). Construction and validation of a social presence scale for measuring online learners’ involvement. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale(Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 1829-1833).
  9. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Khan, B.H. (1997). Web-based instruction: What is it and why is it? In B.H. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 5-18).
  10. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Pu