Journals / Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama / 2017 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

INTERNET USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES: UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES AND OPINIONS ABOUT COPYRIGHTS

Pages
105–121
Publication Date
2017-01-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was determined that the most common reason for students to violate copyrights is their not encountering any sanctions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Internet has become available anytime and anywhere with the advent of mobile communications devices and 3G technology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study conducted with the participation of 223 university students employed both qualitative and quantitative data collection instruments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was determined that the most common reason for students to violate copyrights is their not encountering any sanctions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Internet has become available anytime and anywhere with the advent of mobile communications devices and 3G technology. Today’s university students are using internet actively for educational purposes. In Internet, widely used by students, it is very easy to copy and paste every kind of content and this gives rise to the question of “Is enough attention paid to copyright?” and this causes some concerns in educational circles. Therefore, in the present study, the state of Internet use by university students for educational purposes, their current opinions about the issue of copyright, how they perceive of copyrights and their suggestions to prevent copyright violations were investigated. The present study conducted with the participation of 223 university students employed both qualitative and quantitative data collection instruments. The findings of the study revealed that university students are using Internet extensively for educational purposes; yet, they can easily overlook copyright issues. It was determined that the most common reason for students to violate copyrights is their not encountering any sanctions.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇAYIR, G., AKÇAYIR, M. (2017). INTERNET USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES: UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES AND OPINIONS ABOUT COPYRIGHTS. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 105–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/67927

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akbulut, Y., Uysal, Ö., Odabasi, H. F., & Kuzu, A. (2008). Influence of gender, program of study and PC experience on unethical computer using behaviors of Turkish undergraduate students. Computers & Education, 51(2), 485-492.
  2. Arnold, M., Schmucker, M., & Wolthusen, S. D. (2002). Techniques and applications of digital watermarking and content protection: Artech House. Austin, M. J., & Brown, L. D. (1999). Internet plagiarism: Developing strategies to curb student academic dishonesty. The Internet and higher education, 2(1), 21-33.
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall. Ben-Jacob, M. G. (2005). Integrating computer ethics across the curriculum: A case study. Educational Technology & Society, 8(4), 198-204.
  4. Beycioglu, K. (2009). A cyberphilosophical issue in education: Unethical computer using behavior–The case of prospective teachers. Computers & Education, 53(2), 201-208.
  5. Blum, S. D. (2011). My word!: Plagiarism and college culture: Cornell University Press.
  6. Copyright (2014). The digital millennium copyright act of 1998. Retrieved June 8, 2014, from http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf
  7. Çelik, S., & Akcayir, M. (2012). Perceptions of Academic Staff toward Copyright of Educational Materials. World Journal on Educational Technology, 4(2), 68-80.
  8. DeFosse, E. B. (2012). Ask not what E-books do for People, but what people do with E-books: An exploration of the uses and gratifications theory in regards to E-book technology. (Unpublished master's thesis), USA. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
  9. Frohmann, B. (2008). Subjectivity and information ethics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 267-277.
  10. Gibson, K. (2000). Excuses, excuses: Moral slippage in the workplace. Business Horizons, 43(6), 65-72.
  11. Heffernan, N., & Wang, S. (2008). Copyright and multimedia classroom material: a study from Japan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 167-180.
  12. Herrington, T. A. K. (2010). Intellectual Property on Campus: Students' Rights and Responsibilities: Southern Illinois University Press.
  13. Huang, J. P. (2010). The Ethical Lives of College Students in the Digital Age. (3436591 Ph.D.), The Claremont Graduate University, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/817401448?accountid=16369 ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database. Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting t