Journals / Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

A Study of Background Radioactivity Level for Edirne, Turkey

Pages
135–139
Publication Date
2018-08-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The impressions obtained about the region were evaluated in terms of live health.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of this study is to measure the outdoor gamma dose rates of central district of Edirne and to calculate the annual effective dose equivalent to the public.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this aim, Measurements were taken with a plastic scintillation detector SP6 (via using portable counter ESP2, Eberline) from 14 different points in central district of Edirne.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The impressions obtained about the region were evaluated in terms of live health.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Scintillation detector · Edirne · outdoor gamma dose rate

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to measure the outdoor gamma dose rates of central district of Edirne and to calculate the annual effective dose equivalent to the public. For this aim, Measurements were taken with a plastic scintillation detector SP6 (via using portable counter ESP2, Eberline) from 14 different points in central district of Edirne. According to the calculations, the lowest gamma concentration was measured to 19,6 nGy/h while the highest value was measured to 60 nGy/h. The gamma dose average of 14 points was calculated to 38,5 nGy/h. And, the average annual effective dose equivalent to the public was calculated to 47,3 μSv/y. The impressions obtained about the region were evaluated in terms of live health.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜMÜN, Z. Ü., BAYRAK, K., AKSOY, H., AYSELİ, U. (2018). A Study of Background Radioactivity Level for Edirne, Turkey. Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Sciences, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 135–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/677498

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. William H. Hallenbeck. (1994). Radiation Protection pp. 7-8 [2] Jan-Olov Liljenzin. (2012). Radiochemistry and Nuclear Chemistry pp.283-284 [3] Samuel Glasstone and Philip J. Dolan. (1977). The Effects of Nuclear Weapons pp. 409-410. [4].Kam, E., & Bozkurt, A. (2007). Environmental radioactivity measurements in Kastamonu region of northern Turkey.Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 65(4), 440-444. [5] Governorship: http://www.edirne.gov.tr/# [6] Kocaman S. (2011). Edirne İlinin Turizm Coğrafyası. Atatürk University. Doctorate Thesis pp 81. [7] Kocaman S. (2011). Edirne İlinin Turizm Coğrafyası. Atatürk Üniversity. Doctorate Thesis pp-3. [8] Noriyuki Momoshima. Present Research on the Environmental Radioactivity and Its Perspective in Japan. Journal of Nuclear and Radiochemical Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, (2000): pp. 43−45. [9] Taskin H. Radionuclide concentrations in soil and lifetime cancer risk due to gamma radioactivity in Kirklareli, Turkey. 100 (2009): 49–53. [10] Karahan G. (2000). Assessment of gamma dose rates around Istanbul (Turkey). 47 (2000): 213-221. [11] [11] Yarar Y. “Environmental radioactivity concentrations of Tekirdag”. 1276 (2005): 387 – 389. [12] Turgay M.E. (2015). Assessment of the Environmental Radioactivity in Hatay Region. University of Gaziantep Graduate School of Natural & Applied Sciences. Ph.D. Thesis. [13] UNSCEAR report. (2000). Sources and Effects of Ionising Radiation pp. 90.