Journals / Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of the Adaptation to Pregnancy in Women Who Received Infertility Treatment and Those Who Didn't

Pages
260–267
Publication Date
2022-01-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, pregnant women who received infertility treatment were found to have lower adaptation to the thoughts about the wellbeing of self and baby sub-dimension, and higher adaptation to the identification with the role of motherhood, preparation for labour and control in labour subdimensions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract Purpose: It was aimed to compare the adaptation to pregnancy in women who received infertility treatment and those who didn't.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 174 pregnant women were included in the study, 51 in the group that received infertility treatment and 123 in the group that did not.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, pregnant women who received infertility treatment were found to have lower adaptation to the thoughts about the wellbeing of self and baby sub-dimension, and higher adaptation to the identification with the role of motherhood, preparation for labour and control in labour subdimensions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Infertility · assisted reproductive techniques · woman

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: It was aimed to compare the adaptation to pregnancy in women who received infertility treatment and those who didn't. Methods: A total of 174 pregnant women were included in the study, 51 in the group that received infertility treatment and 123 in the group that did not. The data were collected with the Personal Information Form including the descriptive characteristics and the Prenatal Self-Evaluation Questionnaire (PSEQ). Results: The mean age of the pregnant women who received infertility treatment was 33.73±5.79 years, while it was 28.89±4.12 years for those who didn't. Although the mean total score of PSEQ was lower in pregnant women receiving infertility treatment, the difference was not found to be statistically significant. In the group that became pregnant with the infertility treatment, the subdimension score of "thoughts about the well-being of self and baby" was found to be higher, while the scores of subdimensions "acceptance of pregnancy", "readiness for labour" and "control in labour" were lower. Conclusion: In the study, the adaptation to the pregnancy of both groups was found to be similar. On the other hand, pregnant women who received infertility treatment were found to have lower adaptation to the thoughts about the wellbeing of self and baby sub-dimension, and higher adaptation to the identification with the role of motherhood, preparation for labour and control in labour subdimensions.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKSU, H., ŞATIR, D. G. (2022). Comparison of the Adaptation to Pregnancy in Women Who Received Infertility Treatment and Those Who Didn't. Journal of Basic and Clinical Health Sciences, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 260–267. https://ajindex.com/articles/677056

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Monga M, Alexandrescu B, Katz SE, Stein M, Ganiats T. Impact of infertility on quality of life, marital adjustment, and sexual function. Urology 2004;63:126-130
  2. Akarsu RH, Beji NK. Spiritual and religious issues of stigmatization women with infertility: a qualitative study. J Relig Health 2021;60:256-267
  3. Chandra A, Copen CE, Stephen EH. Infertility and impaired fecundity in the United States, 1982-2010: data from the National Survey of Family Growth. Natl Health Stat Report 2013;141–18
  4. Zhou Z, Zheng D, Wu H, Li R, Xu S, Kang Y et al. (2018). Epidemiology of infertility in China: a population-based study. BJOG 125:432–441
  5. Maharlouei N, Morshed Behbahani B, Doryanizadeh L, Kazemi M. Prevalence and pattern of ınfertility in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis study. Women’s Health Bulletin 2021;8: 63-71
  6. Sarac M, Koc I. Prevalence and risk factors of infertility in Turkey: evidence from demographic and health surveys, 1993-2013. J Biosoc Sci 2018;50:472-490
  7. Ozan YD, Duman M. The relationship between fertility adjustment and self-efficacy of women in the period of infertility treatment. The Journal of Gynecology - Obstetrics and Neonatology 2018;15:43-46
  8. Dornelles LMN, MacCallum F, Lopes RCS, Piccinini CA, Passos EP. The experience of pregnancy resulting from Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) treatment: a qualitative Brazilian study. Women Birth 2016;29:123-127
  9. Massarotti C, Gentile G, Ferreccio C, Scaruffi P, Remorgida V, Anserini P. Impact of infertility and infertility treatments on quality of life and levels of anxiety and depression in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Gynecol Endocrinol 2019;35:485-489
  10. Vitale SG, La Rosa VL, Rapisarda AMC, Lagana AS. Psychology of infertility and assisted reproductive treatment: the Italian situation. Journal Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2017;38:1-3
  11. Boivin J, Appleton TC, Batens P, Baron J, Bitzer J, Corrigan E et al. Guidelines for counseling in fertility: outline version. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1301-1304
  12. Wegrezyn P, Szymusik I. Pregnancy in women after infertility treatment. Archives of Perinatal Medicine. 2014;20:73-77
  13. Çavuşoğlu İ, Beji NK. Assessment of quality of life and depression status of women who got pregnant after infertility treatment. Türkiye Klinikleri J Obstet Womens Health Dis Nurs-Special Topics 2016;2:77-84
  14. Thomopoulos C, Tsioufis C, Michalopoulou H, Makris T, Papademetriou V, Stefanadis C. assisted reproductive technology and preg