Journals / İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

H.L.A. Hart’s “Minimum Content of Natural Law”

Pages
119–130
Publication Date
2021-01-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

His five truisms which is necessary to qualify as law is explained by making reference to examples from black letter law and a critique including the text’s strengths and weaknesses is being provided.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The classic work of “The Concept of Law” written by H.L.A Hart is widely recognized as providing the zenith of legal positivism.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hart’s proposition is that the basic failure of the Austinian model is its neglect of the concept of a rule.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:His five truisms which is necessary to qualify as law is explained by making reference to examples from black letter law and a critique including the text’s strengths and weaknesses is being provided.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:H.L.A. Hart · Positivism · Natural Law

Özet

The classic work of “The Concept of Law” written by H.L.A Hart is widely recognized as providing the zenith of legal positivism. Hart’s proposition is that the basic failure of the Austinian model is its neglect of the concept of a rule. Hart claims that for understanding the foundations of a legal system, rather than an account based on habitual obedience to the commands of an unlimited sovereign, a necessary insight will be that laws are a species of rules and ultimately the foundations of a legal system will be based on the acceptance of a fundamental rule. According to Hart, without the idea of a rule it is not possible to elucidate even the most elementary forms of law and he goes on to identify that the key to the science of jurisprudence lies in the union of what he terms “primary” and “secondary” rules. He therefore definitely disagrees with the proposition that a legal system is just a reflection of political power. This article is about H.L.A. Hart’s study “minimum content of natural law”. The article firstly explains briefly Hart’s theory. His five truisms which is necessary to qualify as law is explained by making reference to examples from black letter law and a critique including the text’s strengths and weaknesses is being provided.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEREBOYLULAR, Ö. (2021). H.L.A. Hart’s “Minimum Content of Natural Law”. İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 119–130. https://ajindex.com/articles/676295

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. D’Entreves Alessandro Passerin, Natural Law, 2nd Edition,
  2. Hutchinson University Library, London 1970.
  3. Doğru, Osman/Nalbant, Atilla, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi, Volume I, Legal, İstanbul 2016. Epstein Richard, “The Not So Minimum Content of Natural Law” (2005)
  4. Oxford Journal of Legal studies, Vol. 25 219-255, https://academic.oup.com/ojls/article-abstract/25/2/219/1388832?redirectedFrom=PDF, accessed. 27.2.2020.
  5. Gözübüyük, Şeref/Gölcüklü, Feyyaz, Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve Uygulaması, turhankitabevi, 11th Edition, Ankara 2016.
  6. Hart H.L.A, The Concept of Law, 3rd Edition,
  7. OUP, London 2012.
  8. İnceoğlu, Sibel, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi ve Anayasa, 3rd Edition,
  9. Beta, İstanbul 2013. Jones Michael/Dugdale Antjony/Simpson Mark, Clerk and Lindsell on Torts, Sweet and Maxwell, London 2010. Mullis Alastair/Oliphant Ken, torts, 4th Edition,
  10. Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2011. Penner James/Melissaris Emmanuel, Textbook on Jurisprudence, 5th Edition,
  11. OUP, London 2012.
  12. Rawls John, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1971.
  13. Simmonds Nigel, Central Issues in Jurisprudence, Sweet & Maxwell, London 2013.
  14. Tezcan, Durmuş/Erdem, Mustafa Ruhan/Sancakdar, Oğuz/Önok, Murat, İnsan Hakları El Kitabı, 6th Edition,
  15. Seçkin, Ankara 2016.
  16. Wadham, John/Mountfield, Helen/Elizabeth, Prochaska/Brown, Christopher, Blackstone’s Guide to the Human Rights Act 1998, 6th Edition,
  17. OUP, London 2012.