Journals / International Journal of Thermodynamics / 2021 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Energy Analysis of Concentrated Photovoltaic/Thermal Panels with Nanofluids

Pages
227–236
Publication Date
2021-08-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The total thermal energy gain of the system was also calculated as 2312 W at 0.6 m3/h for the propylene glycol mixture and 2041 W at 0.5 m3/h for the nanomixture.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, a prototype system was established for location heating application and electricity generation through utilizing two concentrated photovoltaic thermal panels (CPV/T) possessing flat surface receivers connected in series with each other.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the analysis of the installed system, different refrigerants (10% mono propylene glycol + 90% water and 0.5% Al2O3-water nanofluid) were tested at three different flow rates (0.4 m3/h, 0.5 m3/h, 0.6 m3/h).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The total thermal energy gain of the system was also calculated as 2312 W at 0.6 m3/h for the propylene glycol mixture and 2041 W at 0.5 m3/h for the nanomixture.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2041 Verileri
⚙️Variables:concentrated PV/T · solar energy · heating

Abstract

In this study, a prototype system was established for location heating application and electricity generation through utilizing two concentrated photovoltaic thermal panels (CPV/T) possessing flat surface receivers connected in series with each other. The purpose of the system is to supply the heating needs of a room in winter season and to meet the electricity requirement of the equipment used in this system. In the analysis of the installed system, different refrigerants (10% mono propylene glycol + 90% water and 0.5% Al2O3-water nanofluid) were tested at three different flow rates (0.4 m3/h, 0.5 m3/h, 0.6 m3/h). Throughout the experiments, the fan-coil air outlet temperature used to heat the room was adjusted to 35 °C with an inverter and a process control device. The results attained from the experiments carried out using different fluids throughout different months and days (April-May) have demonstrated that the thermal and electrical efficiencies of the system are found to be in good agreement with each other when evaluated in terms of the fluids utilized. The highest electrical energy recovery was found as 268 W at 0.6 m3/h flow rate for propylene glycol-water mixture and 194 W at 0.5 m3/h flow rate for nanomixture. The total thermal energy efficiency for the system using different fluids was found to be around 22%. The total thermal energy gain of the system was also calculated as 2312 W at 0.6 m3/h for the propylene glycol mixture and 2041 W at 0.5 m3/h for the nanomixture.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUMRUL, H., YILMAZ, S., KAYA, M., CEYLAN, İ. (2021). Energy Analysis of Concentrated Photovoltaic/Thermal Panels with Nanofluids. International Journal of Thermodynamics, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 227–236. https://ajindex.com/articles/673414

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. S. Preet, “Water and phase change material based photovoltaic thermal management systems: a review”, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 82, 791-807, (2018). doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.021
  2. A. H. Kazem, “Evaluation and analysis of water-based photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) system”, Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 13, 100401, (2019). doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2019.100401
  3. M. Hasanuzzaman, A.B.M.A. Malek, M.M. Islam, A.K. Pandey, N.A. Rahim, “Global advancement of cooling technologies for PV systems: a review”, Sol. Energy, 137, 25-45, (2016). doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.07.010
  4. L. Hui, T.T. Chow, J. Ji, “Building-integrated heat pipe photovoltaic/thermal system for use in Hong Kong”, Sol. Energy, 155, 1084-1091, (2017). doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.07.055
  5. M. Ghalandari, A. Maleki, A. Haghighi, M.S. Shadloo, M.A. Nazari, I. Tlili, “Applications of nanofluids containing carbon nanotubes in solar energy systems: A review”, J. Mol. Liq., 313, 113476, (2020). doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113476
  6. A. Ergün, H. Eyinç, “Performance assessment of novel photovoltaic thermal system using nanoparticle in phase change material”, Int. J. Numer. Method H., 29(4), 1490-1505, (2019). doi.org/10.1108/HFF-05-2018-0257
  7. A. K. Surana, K. J. Samuel, S. Harshit, U. Kumar, R.T.K. Raj, “Numerical Investigation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger Using Al2O3 Nanofluid”, Int. J. of Thermo., (20) 1, 59-68, (2017). doi.org/10.5541/eoguijt.297407
  8. H. Olia, M. Torabi, M. Bahiraei, M.H. Ahmadi, M. Goodarzi, M.R. Safaei, “Application of Nanofluids in Thermal Performance Enhancement of Parabolic Trough Solar Collector: State-of-the-Art”, Appl. Sci. 9, 463, (2019). doi.org/10.3390/app9030463 [9] W.B. Youssef, T. Maatallah, C. Menezo, S.B. Nasrallah, “Modeling and optimization of a solar system based on concentrating photovoltaic/thermal collector”, Sol. Energy, 170, 301-313, (2018). doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.057
  9. S. Zuhur, İ. Ceylan, A. Ergün, “Energy, exergy and environmental impact analysis of concentrated PV/cooling system in Turkey”, Sol. Energy, 180, 567-574, (2019). doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.060
  10. S. Zuhur, İ. Ceylan, Energy, “Exergy and Enviroeconomic (3E) analysis of concentrated PV and thermal system in the winter application”, Energy Rep., 5, 262-270, (2019). doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.02.003
  11. P. Alves, P.F.J. Fernandes, N.P.J. Torres, C.J.P. Branco, C. Fernandes, J. Gomes, “From Sweden to Portugal: The effect of very distinct clima