SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Thermodynamics / 2026 / Volume: 29 Issue: 3

Effect Of Water Basin Depth on The Thermal Performance of The Double-Basin Solar Still Under Iraqi Climatic Conditions

İbrahem Ali(Middle Technical University)0009-0008-8077-6816
A. J. Hamad
Abdul Hadi Khalifa
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The maximum temperature was recorded on the lower basin glass cover of the 10-10 mm DBSS, reaching about 90 °C.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This work investigates the effect of water depth on the productivity and thermal efficiency of a double-basin solar still (DBSS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The lower basin measured 0.4 x 1 m, while the upper basin, installed above the lower basin’s glass cover, consisted of six sub-basins.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The maximum temperature was recorded on the lower basin glass cover of the 10-10 mm DBSS, reaching about 90 °C.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Saline water · single basin solar still · double basin solar still

Abstract

This work investigates the effect of water depth on the productivity and thermal efficiency of a double-basin solar still (DBSS). The lower basin measured 0.4 x 1 m, while the upper basin, installed above the lower basin’s glass cover, consisted of six sub-basins. Water depths in both the lower and upper basins were studied, ranging from 10 to 30 mm. The double-basin solar still DBSS configurations are denoted by two values, where the first value represents the lower-basin water depth and the second value represents the upper-basin water depth. For comparison, a single-basin still with base dimensions identical to the two-basin still was constructed. The experimental results obtained under the climatic conditions of Baghdad, Iraq (33.3° N, 44.3° E) in October 2025 are as follows: The best DBSS configuration was the 10-10 mm DBSS, which produced 8.75 L/m²·day and 83.24% daily thermal efficiency. The minimum productivity and daily thermal efficiency were for the 30-30 mm DBSS, that is, 5.138 L/m²·day and 71.59%. The maximum improvement in water productivity of the 10-10 mm DBSS was 37.5%, and the minimum of the 30-30 mm DBSS was 19%, compared to single-basin solar still SBSS at 10 mm water depth. The improvement in the daily thermal efficiency of the 10-10 mm and 30-30 mm DBSS was 24% and 12%, respectively, compared with the SBSS at 10 mm water depth. The maximum moisture content for the lower basin of the 10-10 mm DBSS was 700 g/kg dry air at 12 hr, while it was 520 g/kg dry air for the upper basin. The maximum temperature was recorded on the lower basin glass cover of the 10-10 mm DBSS, reaching about 90 °C.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ali, İ., Hamad, A. J., Khalifa, A. H. (2026). Effect Of Water Basin Depth on The Thermal Performance of The Double-Basin Solar Still Under Iraqi Climatic Conditions. International Journal of Thermodynamics, Volume: 29 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.1959300

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. J. Bartram, Ed., Routledge Handbook of Water and Health, 1st edn. Routledge, 2015. doi: 10.4324/9781315693606.
  2. O. Bait, “A critical review on triangular pyramid, weir–type, spherical, and hemispherical solar water distiller conceptions,” Solar Energy, vol. 269, Feb. 2024, Art. no. 112322, doi:10.1016/j.solener.2024.112322.
  3. O. Bait, “Boosting solar–thermal desalination stills employing solar reflective materials – A review,” Thermal Advances, vol. 7, 2026, Art. no. 100129, doi: 10.1016/j.thradv.2026.100129.
  4. A. Y. Hashim, “A new design of a single slop double-basin solar still (SSDBS),” Journal of Basrah Researches, vol. 37, no. 2, 2011.
  5. T. Elango and K. Kalidasa Murugavel, “The effect of the water depth on the productivity for single and double basin double slope glass solar stills,” Desalination, vol. 359, pp. 82–91, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.12.036
  6. T. Rajaseenivasan and K. Srithar, “Performance investigation on solar still with circular and square fins in basin with CO2 mitigation and economic analysis,” Desalination, vol. 380, pp. 66–74, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.11.025.
  7. O. Bait and M. Si-Ameur, “Tubular solar-energy collector integration: Performance enhancement of classical distillation unit,” Energy, vol. 141, pp. 818–838, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.110.
  8. V. R. Khare, A. P. Singh, H. Kumar, and R. Khatri, “Modelling and Performance Enhancement of Single Slope Solar Still Using CFD,” Energy Procedia, vol. 109, pp. 447–455, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.064.
  9. O. Bait and M. Si-Ameur, “Enhanced heat and mass transfer in solar stills using nanofluids: A review,” Solar Energy, vol. 170, pp. 694–722, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.020.
  10. K. V. Modi, D. L. Shukla, and D. B. Ankoliya, ‘A Comparative Performance Study of Double Basin Single Slope Solar Still With and Without Using Nanoparticles’, Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, vol. 141, no. 3, Jun. 2019, Art. no. 031008, doi: 10.1115/1.4041838.
  11. O. Bait, “Exergy, environ–economic and economic analyses of a tubular solar water heater assisted solar still,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 212, pp. 630–646, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.015.
  12. K. V. Modi and J. G. Modi, “Performance of single-slope double-basin solar stills with small pile of wick materials,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 149, pp. 723–730, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.12.071.
  13. B. Pourkafi, B. M. Ziapour, and A. R. Miroliaei, “Numerical study of the transparent cover effects with miscellaneous shapes on the parabolic trough solar collector performance,” International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 13–23, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.5541/ijot.601417.
  14. O. Bait, “Direct and indirect solar–powered desalination processes loaded with nanoparticles: A review,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 37, Feb. 2020, Art. no. 100597 doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2019.100597.
  15. A. Karabuga, M. Z. Yakut, and Z. Utlu, “Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis of the evacuated tube heat pipe; a experimental study,” International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 261–269, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.5541/IJOT.877936.
  16. M. D. Raj Kamal, B. Parandhaman, B. Madhu, D. Magesh Babu, and R. Sathyamurthy, “Experimental analysis on single and double basin single slope solar still with energy storage material and external heater,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 46, pp. 10288–10292, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.444.
  17. S. Moreno, C. Álvarez, J. F. Hinojosa, and V. M. Maytorena, “Numerical analysis of a solar still with phase change material under the basin,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 55, Nov. 2022, Art. no. 105427, doi: 10.1016/j.est.2022.105427.
  18. M. Sanserwal and P. Singh, “Techno-Economic and Enviroeconomic Analysis Review of Distinct Passive and Active Solar Distillation Still,” International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 75–95, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.5541/ijot.1012365.
  19. E. C. Nwosu et al., “Numerical and experimental study of a single-slope double-effect solar still integrated with paraffin wax,” Energy Nexus, vol. 8, Sep. 2022, Art. no. 100155 doi: 10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100155.
  20. M. Patil, I. Patil, S. Shekhawat, and N. Nikam, “Development and Economical Analysis of Innovative Parabolic Trough Collector Integrated Solar Still,” International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 22–34, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.5541/ijot.1313878.
  21. M. Bady, M. El Hadi Attia, A. Elnaby Kabeel, and M. A. Elazab, “Enhancing conical solar still performance using high conductive hollow cylindrical copper fins embedded by PCM,” Solar Energy, vol. 282, Nov. 2024, Art. no. 112990 doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2024.112990.
  22. O. Bait, “A review of clean and sustainable water production via curved desalinators: A super recent data,” Desalination Water Treat., vol. 320, Oct. 2024, Art. no. 100735, doi: 10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100735.
  23. S. Chinnasamy, O. Bait, B. Kalidasan, and A. Fatehmulla, “Investigation on performance enhancement of a novel solar still using metallic fins: an experimental and 5E analysis,” Clean Tech. Environ. Policy, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 6167–6192, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10098-025-03178-w.
  24. O. Ghriss, N. Mekki, S. Dhaoui, M. M. Abdel-Aziz, A. Bouabidi, and M. E. H. Attia, “Experimental assessment of square fin number variation on energy and exergy performance in double-slope solar stills under Tunisia weather conditions,” International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 162, Mar. 2025, Art. no. 108660 doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.108660.
  25. T. Rahman et al., “Enhancing solar still performance using external condensers and floating fins: A comparative study,” Cleaner Chemical Engineering, vol. 11, Dec. 2025, Art. no. 100167, doi: 10.1016/j.clce.2025.100167.
  26. L. Nehar, T. Rahman, M. S. Shahed, M. Y. Prodhan, M. S. Rahman, and S. S. Tuly, “Synergistic integration of PCM-filled coil fins and smart water depth control in solar stills: A comprehensive energy, exergy, and environmental analysis,” Cleaner Chemical Engineering, vol. 11, Dec. 2025, Art. no. 100189, doi: 10.1016/j.clce.2025.100189.
  27. S. A. Kadhim et al., “Exploratory review of innovations in basin geometry of a hemispherical solar stills to increase productivity,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 203, Nov. 2025, Art. no. 107943, doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2025.107943.
  28. S. A. Marzouk, H. Alzaben, A. Aljabr, F. A. Almehmadi, M. A. Sharaf, and D. Ayane, “Enhancing solar still efficiency using different basin water additives,” Energy Reports, vol. 15, Jun. 2026, Art. no. 109127, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109127.
  29. F. L. Rashid et al., “Impact of water depth on solar still performance: A comprehensive review of advanced materials, design innovations, and thermal management strategies,” International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 175, Jun. 2026, Art. no. 111236, doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2026.111236.
  30. F. L. Rashid et al., “Enhancement solar still efficiency through reflectors: a review of latest advancements and design inventions,” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., vol. 151, no. 8, pp. 6427–6457, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.1007/s10973-026-15502-7.
  31. A. K. Hussein et al., “Reimagining Solar Desalination: A Critical Review of Innovations in Spherical Solar Still Design and Performance,” Heat Transfer, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1377–1398, May 2026, doi: 10.1002/htj.70069.
  32. F. L. Rashid et al., “A comprehensive review and mathematical modelling of corrugated-absorber solar stills: Configurations, performance, and cost-effectiveness,” Unconventional Resources, vol. 15, Jan. 2027, Art. no. 100458, doi: 10.1016/j.uncres.2026.100458.
  33. S. H. Majeed, F. L. Rashid, H. N. Azziz, and A. Ameen, “Experimental and numerical investigation of single-slope solar still performance enhanced by porous absorbing materials: thermal, economic, and environmental assessments,” Sci. Rep., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–31, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-41901-9.
  34. H. G. Hameed, H. A. N. Diabil, and M. A. Al-Moussawi, “A numerical investigation of the enhancement of single-slope single-basin solar still productivity,” Energy Reports, vol. 9, pp. 484–500, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.199.
  35. A. Ghazy, “Theoretical study of a double-slope solar still with solar air heater condenser,” International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 977–986, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.14710/ijred.2023.53928.
  36. A. Kumar and O. Prakash, Solar Desalination Technology. in Green Energy and Technology. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-6887-5.