SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Thermodynamics / 2026 / Volume: 29 Issue: 3

Energy, Exergy, and Environmental Assessment of R-152a as a Low-GWP Alternative for R-134a in Domestic Heat Pump Water Heaters for Tropical Countries

Hifni Mukhtar Ariyadi(Universitas Gadjah Mada)0000-0002-0517-9340
Zaki Abdussalam(Universitas Gadjah Mada)0009-0004-0014-5848
Indro Pranoto(Universitas Gadjah Mada)0000-0002-8906-0290
Nyayu Aisyah(Universitas Gadjah Mada)0009-0009-4770-6020
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that R-152a achieved an actual coefficient of performance (COP) of 6.25, which was 4.3% higher than that of R-134a at 5.99.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Domestic heat pump water heaters offer an energy-efficient solution for hot water production in tropical countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study evaluates the energy and exergy performance as well as the environmental impact of R-152a as a replacement for R-134a in a domestic heat pump water heater.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that R-152a achieved an actual coefficient of performance (COP) of 6.25, which was 4.3% higher than that of R-134a at 5.99.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Energy performance · Environmental impact · Heat pump

Abstract

Domestic heat pump water heaters offer an energy-efficient solution for hot water production in tropical countries. This study evaluates the energy and exergy performance as well as the environmental impact of R-152a as a replacement for R-134a in a domestic heat pump water heater. The evaluation uses a thermodynamic modelling approach under fixed operating conditions, with an evaporator temperature of 10°C, a condenser temperature of 50°C, and a water heating capacity of 1.6 m³. The results indicate that R-152a achieved an actual coefficient of performance (COP) of 6.25, which was 4.3% higher than that of R-134a at 5.99. R-152a also required a lower refrigerant mass flow rate. The mass flow rate decreased from 7.595 g/s for R-134a to 4.555 g/s for R-152a, which represents a reduction of approximately 40%. The exergy analysis further showed that R-152a consistently exhibited higher exergy efficiency than R-134a across the investigated ranges of evaporator temperature and compressor efficiency. This result indicates that R-152a has a lower thermodynamic irreversibility. From an environmental perspective, R-152a also showed a much lower direct Total Equivalent Warming Impact (TEWI). Its direct TEWI was 195.3 kg CO2-eq, which was 91.3% lower than that of R-134a at 2252.25 kg CO2-eq. This reduction is mainly related to the lower Global Warming Potential (GWP) of R-152a, which is 124, compared with 1430 for R-134a. The results demonstrate that R-152a is a promising low-GWP alternative to R-134a for domestic heat pump water heaters, offering improved thermodynamic performance, higher exergy efficiency, and substantially reduced environmental impact. However, its flammability must be carefully addressed through proper safety measures before practical implementation.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ariyadi, H. M., Abdussalam, Z., Pranoto, I., Aisyah, N. (2026). Energy, Exergy, and Environmental Assessment of R-152a as a Low-GWP Alternative for R-134a in Domestic Heat Pump Water Heaters for Tropical Countries. International Journal of Thermodynamics, Volume: 29 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.1773781

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (40)

  1. F. İzgi and M. Kavacık, “Analyzing global competitiveness of Turkish air conditioning industry,” Turkish Journal of Engineering, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 209–234, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.31127/tuje.1372141.
  2. M. I. Alhamid, N. Aisyah, Nasruddin, and A. Lubis, “Thermodynamic and environmental analysis of a high-temperature heat pump using HCFO-1224YD(Z) and HCFO-1233ZD(E),” International Journal of Technology, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1585–1592, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.14716/ijtech.v10i8.3459.
  3. R. Mansouri, B.-J. R. Mungyeko Bisulandu, and A. Ilinca, “Assessing Energy Performance and Environmental Impact of Low GWP Vapor Compression Chilled Water Systems,” Energies (Basel)., vol. 16, no. 12, p. 4751, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16124751.
  4. M. Z. Sharif, W. H. Azmi, M. F. Ghazali, M. Samykano, and H. M. Ali, “Performance improvement strategies of R1234yf in vapor compression refrigeration system as a R134a replacement: A review,” Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 148, Jul. 2023, Art. no. 105032, doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2023.105032.
  5. Y. A. Çengel and A. J. Ghajar, Heat and mass transfer: fundamentals & applications, 5th edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education, 2015.
  6. J. Rosenow, D. Gibb, T. Nowak, and R. Lowes, “Heating up the global heat pump market,” Nat. Energy, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 901–904, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41560-022-01104-8.
  7. P. P. Altermatt et al., “Replacing gas boilers with heat pumps is the fastest way to cut German gas consumption,” Commun. Earth Environ., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 56, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s43247-023-00715-7. L. Fedele et al., “Energetic Analysis of Low Global Warming Potential Refrigerants as Substitutes for R410A and R134a in Ground-Source Heat Pumps,” Energies (Basel)., vol. 16, no. 9, p. 3757, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16093757.
  8. Z. Wang, M. B. Luther, M. Amirkhani, C. Liu, and P. Horan, “State of the Art on Heat Pumps for Residential Buildings,” Buildings, vol. 11, no. 8, p. 350, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.3390/buildings11080350.
  9. F. Polonara, L. Kuijpers, and R. Peixoto, ‘Potential impacts of the Montreal Protocol Kigali Amendment to the choice of refrigerant alternatives’, IJHT, vol. 35, pp. 1–8, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.18280/ijht.35Sp0101.
  10. T. Bernat and K. Bieńczak, “Methodology of Multiple-Criteria Decision Making for Selecting a Refrigerant to Be Used in Commercial Refrigeration Equipment,” Energies (Basel)., vol. 17, no. 20, p. 5150, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/en17205150.
  11. W. L. Luyben, “Refrigerant selection for different cryogenic temperatures,” Comput. Chem. Eng., vol. 126, pp. 241–248, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.03.030.
  12. M. H. Haqqani, M. Azizuddin, S. S. Qarnain, and S. Bathrinath, “Analyzing Properties of Air as a natural refrigerant using MCDM methodology,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1059, no. 1, Feb. 2021, Art. no. 012040, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1059/1/012040.
  13. N. Aisyah and H. M. Ariyadi, “Performance Evaluation of R1224yd as Alternative to R123 and R245fa for Vapor Compression Heat Pump System,” International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 13–21, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.5541/ijot.1310329.
  14. A. R. El-Sayed, M. El Morsi, and N. A. Mahmoud, “A Review of the Potential Replacements of HCFC/HFCs Using Environment-Friendly Refrigerants,” International Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration, vol. 26, no. 03, Sep. 2018, Art. no. 1830002, doi: 10.1142/S2010132518300021.
  15. D. Sánchez, A. Andreu-Nácher, D. Calleja-Anta, R. Llopis, and R. Cabello, “Energy impact evaluation of different low-GWP alternatives to replace R134a in a beverage cooler. Experimental analysis and optimization for the pure refrigerants R152a, R1234yf, R290, R1270, R600a and R744,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 256, Mar. 2022, Art. no. 115388, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115388.
  16. B. O. Bolaji, “Experimental study of R152a and R32 to replace R134a in a domestic refrigerator,” Energy, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 3793–3798, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.031.
  17. R. Cabello, D. Sánchez, R. Llopis, I. Arauzo, and E. Torrella, “Experimental comparison between R152a and R134a working in a refrigeration facility equipped with a hermetic compressor,” International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 60, pp. 92–105, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.06.021.
  18. F. Jang, Y. Wang, B. Yu, D. Wang, J. Shi, and J. Chen, “Effects of various operating conditions on the performance of a CO2 air conditioning system for trains,” International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 107, pp. 105–113, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.IJREFRIG.2019.07.009.
  19. A. E. Akan, F. Ünal, and D. B. Özkan, “Investigation of efficiency of R717 refrigerant single stage cooling system and R717/R744 refrigerant cascade cooling system,” Turkish Journal of Engineering, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 58–64, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.31127/tuje.672888.
  20. H. M. Ariyadi and A. Coronas, “Absorption Capacity of Ammonia into Ionic Liquids for Absorption Refrigeration Applications,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 745, no. 3, Sep. 2016, Art. no. 032105, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/745/3/032105.
  21. H. M. Ariyadi, S. Yamaguchi, and K. Saito, “Assessment of thermal and transport properties of ionic liquids as suitable absorbent for absorption cooling applications,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 539, no. 1, p. 012005, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/539/1/012005.
  22. H. M. Ariyadi, N. Giannetti, S. Yamaguchi, and K. Saito, “Comparative analysis of ionic liquids as sorptive media for absorption cooling systems,” Refrigeration Science and Technology, 2019. doi: 10.18462/iir.icr.2019.1033.
  23. B. Megaprastio, A. M. Zaka, R. S. Zahra, N. Aisyah, and H. M. Ariyadi, “Design of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) System Using R600 and R600a as Working Fluid,” in E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 448, Nov. 2023, Art. no. 04004. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202344804004.
  24. S. Sabzpoushan, M. R. Morad, and H. Ebrahimi Rahnama, “A combined cooling and power transcritical CO2 cycle for waste heat recovery from gas turbines,” Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, vol. 34, Sep. 2022, Art. no. 101423, doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2022.101423.
  25. A. Maiorino, R. Llopis, M. G. Del Duca, and C. Aprea, “Environmental impact assessment of R-152a as a drop-in replacement of R-134a in a domestic refrigerator,” International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 117, pp. 132–139, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2020.04.014.
  26. S.-Y. Yoo and D.-W. Lee, “Experimental study on performance of automotive air conditioning system using R-152a refrigerant,” International Journal of Automotive Technology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 313–320, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s12239-009-0036-y.
  27. A. Maiorino, C. Aprea, M. G. Del Duca, R. Llopis, D. Sánchez, and R. Cabello, “R-152a as an alternative refrigerant to R-134a in domestic refrigerators: An experimental analysis,” International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 96, pp. 106–116, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2018.09.020.
  28. S. W. Hadi, Y. T. Wijaya, I. R. Elysabeth, N. Aisyah, R. D. D. Putra, and H. M. Ariyadi, “Energy Performance Analysis of R32 and R134a Refrigerant for Spring Pool Water Heater,” Advanced Engineering Letters, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 88–95, 2023, doi: 10.46793/adeletters.2023.2.3.2.
  29. K. Bakirci and B. Yuksel, “Simulation study of solar-source heat pump system with sensible energy storage,” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., vol. 146, no. 4, pp. 1853–1864, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10973-020-10091-5.
  30. I. Dincer and M. Kanoglu, Refrigeration systems and applications, 2nd ed. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K: Wiley, 2010.
  31. A. G. Devecioğlu and V. Oruç, “The thermodynamic and environmental analysis of a variable speed R404A refrigeration system using R455A,” Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, vol. 56, Dec. 2024, Art. no. 103083, doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2024.103083.
  32. A. G. Devecioğlu and V. Oruç, “Experimental comparison of R404A and R452A in refrigeration systems,” Sci. Technol. Built Environ., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 61–69, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1080/23744731.2020.1796419.
  33. A. M. Ashour et al., “Energy, exergy, and environmental analysis of five low-GWP refrigerants considered as alternatives to R410A for air conditioning systems,” Int. J. Air-Cond. Ref., vol. 33, no. 1, p. 18, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44189-025-00087-x.
  34. PLN ESG Performance Report 2022: Sustainability Report Supplement, Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN), Jakarta, Indonesia, 2023.
  35. E. Lemmon, M. Huber, and M. McLinden, “NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties-REFPROP, Version 8.0,” May 2007, Natl Std. Ref. Data Series (NIST NSRDS), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
  36. D. Guo and Y. Sakata, ‘Assessing the Potential Reductions of CO2 Emission by Using Groundwater-Based Heat Pump Systems Across China’s Climate Zones’, in 9th International Conference on Energy and Environmental Science, L. Dong, Y. Ding, and Y. Liu, Eds, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, pp. 1437–1448. doi: 10.1007/978-3-032-01036-0_102.
  37. Y. Chen, G. Kong, X. Xu, S. Hu, and Q. Yang, “Machine-learning-based performance prediction of the energy pile heat pump system,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 77, Oct. 2023, Art. no. 107442, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107442.
  38. M. Ghodbane, J. A. Baker, and P. S. Kadle, “Potential applications of R-152a refrigerant in vehicle climate control part II,” SAE Technical Papers, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.4271/2004-01-0918.
  39. X. Wu and Z. Yang, "Experimental research on the lower flammability limits of several refrigerants with lower climate change effects," in ACRA 2014 - Proceedings of the 7th Asian Conference on Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, Jeju Island, May 2014.
  40. Z. Yang and X. Wu, “Retrofits and options for the alternatives to HCFC-22,” Energy, vol. 59, pp. 1–21, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.065.