SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hitit Medical Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Results and Their Potential Factors Among Local Population and Refugees

Yerli Popülasyon ve Mülteciler Arası Perkütan Nefrolitotomi Sonuçlarının ve Etkileyen Olası Faktörlerin Değerlendirilmesi

Mesut Berkan DURAN
Yalçın KIZILKAN
Taha Numan YIKILMAZ
Murat DEMİRAY
Abdulmecit YAVUZ
Soner AKCİN
Serdar TOKSÖZ
Pages
98–103
Publication Date
2022-10-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The stone burden was significantly higher in refugee population (466.8 mm2 & 1107.4 mm2, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Over five million refugees have been migrated to Turkey due to the current developments there.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We retrospectively evaluated who underwent PNL in two different healthcare centers between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The stone burden was significantly higher in refugee population (466.8 mm2 & 1107.4 mm2, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Mülteci · perkütan nefrolitotomi · taş yükü

Abstract

Objective: Over five million refugees have been migrated to Turkey due to the current developments there. Language problems, high number of unregistered refugees, economic reasons, and unemployment in the refugee population makes it difficult for them to receive quality health care and may cause patients to apply to the hospital with more complicated diseases. This study aimed to evaluate surgical results and complications between the local population and refugee patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated who underwent PNL in two different healthcare centers between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019. The patients were divided into two groups as "Local Population" and "Refugees" and were compared with each other. Results: The stone burden was significantly higher in refugee population (466.8 mm2 & 1107.4 mm2, p

Özet

Amaç: Ülkelerindeki mevcut gelişmeler nedeniyle beş milyondan fazla mülteci Türkiye’ye göç etmiştir. Mülteci nüfusundaki dil sorunları, kayıt dışı mülteci sayısının fazlalığı, ekonomik nedenler ve işsizlik kaliteli sağlık hizmeti almalarını zorlaştırmakta ve hastaların daha komplike hastalıklarla hastaneye başvurmasına neden olabilmektedir. Bu çalışmada, perkütan nefrolitotomi (PNL) uygulanan yerel popülasyon ile mülteci hastalar arasındaki cerrahi sonuçlar ve komplikasyonların değerlendirmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: İki farklı sağlık merkezinde 1 Ocak 2018 ile 31 Aralık 2019 tarihleri arasında PNL uygulanan hastalar retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Hastalar "Yerel Nüfus" ve "Mülteciler" olarak iki gruba ayrılarak birbirleriyle karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Mülteci nüfusunda taş yükü yerel popülasyona göre önemli ölçüde daha yüksekti (466.8 mm2 & 1107.4 mm2, p

🔖

Cite This Article

DURAN, M. B., KIZILKAN, Y., YIKILMAZ, T. N., DEMİRAY, M., YAVUZ, A., AKCİN, S., TOKSÖZ, S. (2022). Evaluation of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Results and Their Potential Factors Among Local Population and Refugees. Hitit Medical Journal, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 98–103. https://ajindex.com/articles/671564

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol. 2017;35(9):1301-20
  2. Menon M. Urinary lithiasis: Etiology diagnosis and medical management campbell's urology. Campbell's Urology. 2005;4:3229-89
  3. Türk C, Neisius A, Petřík A. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2020. Publisher: EAU Guidelines Office Place published: Arnhem, The Netherlands. 2020
  4. Wright A, Rukin N, Smith D, De la Rosette J, Somani BK. ‘Mini, ultra, micro’–nomenclature and cost of these new minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) techniques. Therapeutic advances in urology. 2016;8(2):142-6
  5. Giusti G, Piccinelli A, Taverna G, Benetti A, Pasini L, Corinti M, et al. Miniperc? No, thank you! Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):810-4; discussion 5
  6. Skolarikos A, de la Rosette J. Prevention and treatment of complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18(2):229-34
  7. Oguz U, Resorlu B, Bayindir M, Sahin T, Bozkurt OF, Unsal A. Emergent intervention criterias for controlling sever bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. ISRN Urol. 2013;2013:760272
  8. Toksoz S, Dirim A, Kizilkan Y, Ozkardes H. The effect of American Society of Anesthesiology scores on percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes. Urol Int. 2012;89(3):301-6
  9. Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Gupta A, Bensalah K, Cadeddu JA, Lotan Y, et al. Natural history of residual fragments following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol. 2009;181(3):1163-8
  10. Park J, Hong B, Park T, Park HK. Effectiveness of noncontrast computed tomography in evaluation of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2007;21(7):684-7
  11. Margel D, Lifshitz DA, Kugel V, Dorfmann D, Lask D, Livne PM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients who previously underwent open nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2005;19(10):1161-4
  12. Sofikerim M, Şahin A, Akdoğan B, Ekici S, Atsü N, Özgen S. Perkütan Nefrolitotomi: 500 renal ünite sonuçlarımız. Üroloji Bülteni. 2004;13:25-9
  13. MÜSLÜMANOĞLU AY, TEFEKLİ A, TAŞ A, ÇAKIR T, SARILAR Ö. Öğrenme eğrisinde ilk 100 perkütan nefrolitotomi olgusunun analizi. Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology. 2004;30(3):339-47
  14. Martin X, Tajra LC, Gelet A, Dawahra M, Konan PG, Dubernard JM. Complete staghorn stones: percutaneous approach using one or multiple percutaneous accesses. J Endourol. 1999;13(5):367-8
  15. Aron M, Yadav R, Goel R, Kolla SB